Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:4 (2020) ► pp. 788811
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2006Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2018Serial verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea
(eds.) 2015Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Gary M.
1996Hittite diplomatic texts. Atlanta (GA): Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
(eds.) 2008Constructions and language change. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2009Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, George
1985IE horatory *ey, *eyte, Ved. ēta … stavama, Hitt. ehu+wa it, Horn. εἰ δ’ἀγε. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 46. 47–79.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H.
1987Discourse function of motion verbs in Chadic. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 10. 53–71.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2003The structure of time. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1966Deictic categories in the semantics of ‘come’. Foundations of Language 2. 219–227.Google Scholar
1983How to know whether you are coming or going. In Gisa Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis, 219–221. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes
1930Staatsverträge des Ḫatti-Reiches in hethitischer Sprache. 2. Teil. Leipzig: Hinrich.Google Scholar
1960Hethitisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1990The syntax of Anatolian pronominal clitics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
1997The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 1(2). 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, Albrecht
1933Die Annalen des Mursilis. Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatisch-Aegyptischen Gesellschaft, 38 Band, Heft VI 23.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010The behaviour-before-coding principle in syntactic change. In Franck Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, 541–554. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de l’École Normale Superieure.Google Scholar
2016The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17(3). 291–319.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2000On the rise of new-event markers in Kxoe. In Rainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner & Antje Meifiner (eds.) Mehr als nur Worte …: Afrikanistische Beitrage zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 269–284. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 458–477. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. & H. Craig Melchert
2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, Alwin
2008Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Koller, Bernhard
2015Hittite pai- ‘go’ and uwa- ‘come’ as restructuring verbs. In Leonid Kulikov & Nikolaos Lavidas (eds.), Proto-Indo-European syntax and its development, 79–99. Amstedam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Christa, Bernd Heine & Karsten Legère
2015The Akie language of Tanzania: A sketch of discourse grammar. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tanya, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1990Old Hittite sentence structure. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993Verb serialization and word order. Evidence from Hittite. In: Henning Aertsen & Robert J. Jeffers (eds.), Historical linguistics 1989, 267–281. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1996Processi di grammaticalizzazione in ittita. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 81(1). 45–47.Google Scholar
1998I verbi ausiliari in ittita. In: Giuliano Bernini, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Ars Linguistica. Studi in onore di Paolo Ramat, 299–322. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2010Experiencer predicates in Hittite. In Ronald. I. Kim, Elisabeth Rieken, Norbert Oettinger & Michael J. Weiss (eds.), Ex Anatolia lux, 249–264. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
2017The syntax of Anatolian. In J. Klein. Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, 274–291. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
2018Subordination and sentence connectives in Old Hittite: A quantitative analysis. In: Elisabeth Rieken, Teresa Roth & Ulrich Geupel (eds.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen. Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung, 259–274. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich
1995Futur im Hethitischen? In Heinrich Hettrich, Wolfgang Hock, Peter-Arnold Mumm & Norbert Oettinger (eds.), Verba et Structurae: Festschrift für Klaus Strunk zum 65. Geburtstag, 195–202. Innsbruck: Institut fur Sprachwissenschaft der Universitat Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Rieken, Elisabeth
2010Die periphrastischen Konstruktionen mit pai- ‘gehen’ und uwa- ‘kommen’ im Hethitischen. In Christel Ruster, Jean Catsanicos & René Lebrun (eds.), la-a-ma-an-te-et na-ak-ki-i: Studia anatolica in memoriam Erich Neu scripta, 217–239. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Sideltsev, Andrei
2017Accented clitics in Hittite? Transactions of the Philological Society 115(2). 176–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1(1). 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Hout, Theo
2003Studies in the Hittite phraseological construction. I. Its syntactic and semantic properties. In Gary Beckman, Richard H. Beal & Gregory McMahon (eds.), Hittite studies in honor of Harry A. Hoffner Jr. on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 177–204. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
2010Studies in the Hittite phraseological construction, II: Its origin. Hethithica 16. 191–204.Google Scholar
Widmer, Paul
2009Hethitisch nu als Mittel der informationsstrukturellen und syntaktischen Verknüpfung. In Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.) Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 321–333. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Gernoth & Francesco Fuscagni
(eds.) 2020Hethitologie Portal Mainz. Available at: http://​www​.hethport​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/HPM​/index​.php (last access 22 July 2020).
Yates, Anthony D.
2014On the PIE ‘quasi-serial verb’ construction: Origin and development. In: Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert & Brent Vine (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 237–55. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Younger, K. Lawson
1990Ancient conquest accounts. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar