Chapter published in:
Language Variation - European Perspectives VII: Selected papers from the Ninth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 9), Malaga, June 2017
Edited by Juan-Andrés Villena-Ponsoda, Francisco Díaz Montesinos, Antonio-Manuel Ávila-Muñoz and Matilde Vida-Castro
[Studies in Language Variation 22] 2019
► pp. 120–131

ASPA Tools or how to measure foreign-accentedness and intelligibility in an objective manner

| Universidad Rey Juan Carlos I, Spain
Dialectometry has traditionally been examined from the perspective of the dialects and accents of a single language or related languages. However, foreign accents still remain understudied within this paradigm (see section 2 and Wieling et al. 2014 for an exception).In this chapter we present ASPA Tools (Accented-Speech Phonetic Alignment), a web application which measures phonetic distances between foreign-accented speech and a standard pronunciation. Unlike similar instruments (Visual DialectoMetry or Gabmap), ASPA Tools measures the degree of intelligibility of non-native English speech in relation to English as a Lingua Franca (ELF).We use Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) and two variations of the Levenshtein Distance (LD) to examine the pronunciation of a group of speakers and compare it to a given ELF standard. Furthermore, ASPA Tools objectively measures the prototypical pronunciation of the group, which allows researchers to analyse the most salient deviations from the ELF standard.
Keywords: Lectometry, intelligibility, foreign accents, ELF, ASPA Tools, prototipicality
Published online: 12 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.22.07jur
References

References

Alonso, Laura, Irene Castellon, Jordi Escribano, Xavier Messeguer, and Lluis Padro
2004 “Multiple Sequence Alignment for Characterizing the Linear Structure of Revision.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: 403–6. Lisbon (Portugal). Retrieved from: https://​goo​.gl​/C1XNia [Accessed 16/08/2018]Google Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, Gotzon, Gotzon Santander, Iker Usobiaga, and Aitor Iglesias
2016 “Diatech: Tool for Making Dialectometry Easier.” Dialectologia: Revista Electrònica 17: 1–22.Google Scholar
Beijering, Karin, Charlotte Gooskens, and Wilbert Heeringa
2008 “Predicting Intelligibility and Perceived Linguistic Distances by Means of the Levenshtein Algorithm.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 15: 13–24.Google Scholar
Bloem, Jelke, Anna Mészáros, Martijn Benjamin Wieling, and John Nerbonne
2016 “Automatically Identifying Characteristic Features of Non-Native English Accents.” In The Future of Dialects, ed. by Marie-Hélène Côté,, Remco Knooihuizen, and John Nerbonne, 155–173. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1989 Prospects and Problems of Prototype Theory. Linguistics 27 (4): 587–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, and Wilbert Heeringa
2004 “Perceptive Evaluation of Levenshtein Dialect Distance Measurements Using Norwegian Dialect Data.” Language Variation and Change 16 (03): 189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte, Wilbert Heeringa, and Karin Beijering
2008 “Phonetic and Lexical Predictors of Intelligibility.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2 (1–2): 63–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haimerl, Edgar
2006 “Database Design and Technical Solutions for the Management, Calculation, and Visualization of Dialect Mass Data.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 21 (4): 437–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert
2004 Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 46.Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert, Peter Kleiweg, Charlotte Gooskens, and John Nerbonne
2006 “Evaluation of String Distance Algorithms for Dialectology.” LD´06 Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Distances: 51–62. Sydney (Australia): Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from: https://​goo​.gl​/ErMoTi [Accessed 26/07/2018] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer
2000 The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jurado-Bravo, Maria Angeles
2018 The Intelligibility of Spanish Regional Accents in L2 English after Tailored Lingua Franca Core Instruction: a Critical Empirical Analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Faculty of Philology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte
2003 “How to Do Things with Allophones. Linguistic Stereotypes as Cognitive Reference Points in Social Cognition”. In Cognitive Models and Thought. Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings, ed. by René Dirven and Roslyn M. Frank, 69–120. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Towards a Usage-Based Cognitive Phonology”. International Journal of English Studies 6 (2): 107–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Style-Shifting and Shifting Styles: A Socio-Cognitive Approach to Lectal Variation”. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven, 45–88. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Lectal Acquisition and Linguistic Stereotype Formation”. In Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen and Yves Peirsman, 225–263. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leinonen, Therese, Çağrı Çöltekin, and John Nerbonne
2016 “Using Gabmap.” Lingua, Linguistic Research in the CLARIN Infrastructure: 178: 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levis, John M.
2005 “Changing Contexts and Shifting Paradigms in Pronunciation Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 39 (3): 369–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John, Rinke Colen, Charlotte Gooskens, Peter Kleiweg, and Therese Leinonen
2011 “Gabmap - a Web Application for Dialectology.” Dialectologia: Revista Electrònica: 65–89.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John, and Wilbert Heeringa
2001 “Computational Comparison and Classification of Dialects.” Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 9: 69–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John, and Peter Kleiweg
2003 “Lexical Distance in LAMSAS.” Computers and the Humanities 37 (3): 339–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pilus, Zahariah
2013 “Exploring ESL Learners’ Attitudes Towards English Accents.” World Applied Sciences Journal 21: 143–152.Google Scholar
Prokić, Jelena, Martijn Benjamin Wieling, and John Nerbonne
2009 “Multiple Sequence Alignments in Linguistics.” Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Language Technology and Resources for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, 18–25.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 “Natural Categories”. Cognitive Psychology 4 (3): 328–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975a “Cognitive Reference Points”. Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 532–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975b “Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 104 (3): 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scales, Julie, Ann Wennerstrom, Dara Richard, and Su Hui Wu
2006 “Language Learners’ Perceptions of Accent.” Tesol Quarterly 40 (4): 715–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara
2011 Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: OUP Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Larry E., and Cecil L. Nelson
1985 “International Intelligibility of English: Directions and Resources.” World Englishes 4 (3): 333–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1995 Linguistic Categorisation: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Robin
2010 Teaching the Pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Steven
2015 Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from http://​accent​.gmu​.edu [Accessed 10/08/2018]Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn Benjamin
2012 A Quantitative Approach to Social and Geographical Dialect Variation. University Library Groningen: Groningen.Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn Benjamin, Jelke Bloem, Kaitlin Mignella, Mona Timmermeister, and John Nerbonne
2014 “Measuring Foreign Accent Strength in English. Validating Levenshtein Distance as a Measure.” The Mind Research Repository (Beta) 0 (1):1–12.Google Scholar