Chapter published in:

Language Variation - European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015
Edited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar
[Studies in Language Variation 19] 2017
► pp. 173–184

A corpus-based study of concessive conjunctions in three L1-varieties of English

Ole Schützler | University of Bamberg

This paper presents an analysis of the concessive conjunctions although, though and even though in three varieties of English from different world regions: British, Canadian and New Zealand English. The analysis, which is based on the International Corpus of English, reveals that although and though are typically used to mark concessives of the semantic type referred to as speech-act concessive, while even though prefers another type, defined as content concessive. Notably, these semantic properties of conjunctions are very similar not only in the three varieties under investigation, but also in speech and writing. The paper thus highlights underexplored semantic characteristics of different concessive conjunctions and demonstrates their inter- and intra-varietal stability.

Keywords: varieties of English, British English, Canadian English, New Zealand English, corpus linguistics, concession, syntax, subordination, subjectivity

Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.11sch

References

Aarts, Bas

1988 “Clauses of Concession in Written Present-Day British English.” Journal of English Linguistics 21 (1): 39–58.

Anthony, Laurence

2014 AntConc. A Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for Concordancing and Text Analysis. Version 3.4.4w. [computer program] http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html

Azar, Moshe

1997 “Concessive Relations as Argumentations.” Text 17 (3): 301–316.

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar

2003 Concession in Spoken English. On the Realisation of a Discourse-pragmatic Relation. Tübingen: Narr.

Britain, David, and Peter Trudgill

2000 “Migration, dialect contact, new-dialect formation and reallocation.” In Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, ed. by Klaus J. Mattheier, 73–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson

2000 “Concessive patterns in conversation.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Crevels, Mily

2000 “Concessives on different semantic levels: A typologocal perspective.” In Cause – Condition – Condition – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 313–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Greenbaum, Sidney

1996 “Introducing ICE.” In Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English, ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hermodsson, Lars

1994 “Der Begriff ‘konzessiv’. Terminologie und Analysen.” Studia Neophilologia 66: 59–75.

Hilpert, Martin

2013 Constructional change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum

2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

International Corpus of English (ICE)

http://ice-corpora.net/ice/index.htm

Kachru, Braj B.

1988 “The sacred cows of English.” English Today 4 (4): 3–8.

König, Ekkehard

1985 “On the history of concessive connectives in English. Diachronic and synchronic evidence.” Lingua 66 (1): 1–19.

Lang, Ewald

2000 “Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach.” In Cause – Condition – Condition – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 235–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Leech, Geoffrey N., Paul Rayson, and Andrew Wilson

2001 Word frequencies in written and spoken English based on the British National Corpus. Harlow: Longman.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik

1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Arnold.

R Development Core Team

2016 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.2.4. [computer program] http://www.R-project.org.

Rohdenburg, Günter

1996 “Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English.” Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 149–182.

Sarkar, Deepayan

2014 lattice: Lattice graphics. R-package version 0.20–29. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lattice/lattice.pdf

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt

2013 “Analysing aggregated linguistics data.” In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, ed. by Manfred Krug and Julia Schlüter, 433–455. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sweetser, Eve E.

1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, Elisabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher

2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tsunoda, Mie

2012 “Five-level classification of clause linkage in Japanese.” Studies in Language 36(2): 382–429.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gast, Volker

2019. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305], ► pp. 151 ff.

Schützler, Ole

2018. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 195 ff.

Schützler, Ole

2019. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346], ► pp. 247 ff.

Schützler, Ole

2020. Although ‐constructions in varieties of English . World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 443 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.