Chapter published in:
Language Variation - European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015
Edited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar
[Studies in Language Variation 19] 2017
► pp. 23–46

A case for clustering speakers and linguistic variables

Big issues with smaller samples in language variation

| Victoria University of Wellington
| University of Aukland
We undertake a detailed analysis of a sample of over 10,000 utterances from 18 speakers in a corpus of Bequia English and apply constrained cluster analysis to discern patterns that identify the linguistic signatures for different villages and to see how individuals pattern in relation to the rest of their village. The analysis of multiple variables provides a richer picture of both group and individual than any one variable does and holds promise for better understanding the mysterious mechanisms by which variation between individuals scales up to variation between groups.
Keywords: Bequia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, creole, group and individual, multiple variables, cluster analysis, scaling up, historical linguistics
Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.02mey
References

References

Baayen, R. Harald
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Xia Hua, Thomas G. Fitzpatrick, and Simon J. Greenhill
2015 “Rate of Language Evolution Is Affected by Population Size.” PNAS. 112(7): 2097–2102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2014 Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henritta and David Sankoff
1974 “Variable Rules: Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence.” Language 50(2): 333–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2013 “Grammaticalisation in Social Context: The Emergence of a New English Pronoun.” Journal of Sociolinguistics. 17(5): 608–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daleszynska, Agata
2011 Variation in Past Tense Marking in Bequia Creole: Apparent Time Change and Dialect Levelling. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
2013 “The Local, Global, and the Authentic: Language Change and Authenticity in Bequia.” Zeitschrift fur Anglistik and Amerikanistik (Special issue on Authenticity in Creole Languages). 60(3): 275–94.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1996 “Vowels and Nail Polish: The Emergence of Linguistic Style in the Preadolescent Heterosexual Marketplace.” In Natasha Warner et al. (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 183–90. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Simon J. Greenhill and Quentin D. Atkinson
2013 “Phylogenetic Models of Language Change: Three New Questions.” In Peter J. Richerson and Morten H. Christiansen (eds.). Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion, 285–300. Strüngmann Forum Reports, vol. 12, J. Lupp, series editor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1980 “Variation in the Group and in the Individual.” In W. Labov (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2013 “The Cognitive Coherence of Sociolects: How Do Speakers Handle Multiple Sociolinguistic Variables?” Journal of Pragmatics 52: 63–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Bricks and Bricolage: The Question of Sociolinguistic Coherence.” Plenary address at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hazenberg, Evan
2015 “Gendering Vowels: Sociophonetics and Community Affiliation.” Paper presented at the New Zealand Linguistic Society. University of Otago.
Hinsken, Frans, and Gregory R. Guy
(eds.) 2016 “Coherence, Covariation and Bricolage. Various Approaches to the Systematicity of Language Variation.” Special issue of Lingua 172–173.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara, and David Sankoff
1987 “Delimiting the Sydney Speech Community.” Language in Society 16: 179–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra M.
(ed.) 2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 “Getting Off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass. 3(1): 359–383, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2006[1966] The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, Wiliam
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change: Vol. 1 Internal factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change: Vol. 2 External factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, Wiliam
2010 Principles of Linguistic Change: Vol 3 Cognitive factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Pierre and Louis Legendre
2012 Numerical Ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez and Sophie Holmes-Elliott
2013 “East End Boys and West End Girls: /s/-Fronting in Southeast England.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 41. 19(2): article 13. http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol19​/iss2​/13
Meyerhoff, Miriam
1999 “Sorry in the Pacific: Defining Communities, Defining Practices.” Language in Society 28(2): 225–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam and James A. Walker
2007 “The Persistence of Variation in Individual Grammars: Copula Absence in ‘Urban Sojourners’ and Their Stay-at-Home Peers, Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines).” Journal of Sociolinguistics. 11, 3. 346–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Bequia Talk: St Vincent and the Grenadines. Westminster: Battlebridge Publishing.Google Scholar
2013b “An Existential Problem: The Sociolinguistic Monitor and Variation in Existential Constructions on Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines).” Language and Society 42 (4): 407–428. doiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moineddin, Rahim, Flora I. Matheson and Richard H. Glazier
2007 “A Simulation Study of Sample Size for Multilevel Logistic Regression Models.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 7(34) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, Jari, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Roeland Kindt, Pierre Legendre, Peter R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, Gavin L. Simpson, Peter Solymos, M. Henry H. Stevens and Helene Wagner
(2016) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3–4. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=vegan
Oushiro, Livia
2016 “Social and Structural Constraints in Lectal Cohesion.” Lingua 172–173: 116–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia and Gregory R. Guy
2014 “The Effect of Salience on Co-variation in Brazilian Portuguese.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 43. 21(2): paper 18. http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol21​/iss2​/18
Roy, Joseph and Stephen Levey
2014 “Mixed Effects Models and Unbalanced Sociolinguistic Data: The Need for Caution.” Paper presented at New Ways of Analying Variation 43. Chicago.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1993 “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction. 26(1): 99–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, Cajo J. F.
1986 “Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis.” Ecology 67(5): 1167–1179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004 “Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian Migrations and Phoneme Inventories.” Linguistic Typology. 8(3): 305–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, James A. and Miriam Meyerhoff
2013 “Studies of the Community and the Individual.” In Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron and Ceil Lucas (eds). Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 175–194.Google Scholar
Wilson, Marc Stewart, Joseph Bulbulia and Chris G. Sibley
2013 “Differences and Similarities in Religious and Paranormal Beliefs: A Typology of Distinct Faith Signatures.” Religion, Brain and Behavior. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Buson, Laurence, Aurélie Nardy, Dominique Muller & Jean-Pierre Chevrot
2018. The Sociolinguistic Repetition Task: A New Paradigm for Exploring the Cognitive Coherence of Language Varieties. Topics in Cognitive Science 10:4 ► pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
Daleszynska-Slater, Agata, Miriam Meyerhoff & James A. Walker
2019. Order in the creole speech community. Language Ecology 3:1 ► pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Villena-Ponsoda, Juan-Andrés & Matilde Vida-Castro
2020.  In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24], ► pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.