Article published in:
Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change
Edited by Janne Bondi Johannessen † and Joseph C. Salmons
[Studies in Language Variation 18] 2015
► pp. 135–160

Functional Convergence and Extension in Contact

Syntactic and Semantic Attributes of the Progressive Aspect in Pennsylvania Dutch

| University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
| Penn State University
This paper investigates the extension of the progressive aspect in contemporary Pennsylvania Dutch. The scope of convergence in contact varieties is a debated subject in theoretical linguistics; the most recent and promising research finds that convergence in contact is not a simple one-to-one mapping, nor an opportunity for any structural anomaly to present. Previous studies concluded that Pennsylvania Dutch had matched and gone beyond English semantic constraints for the progressive aspect. The extent of the progressive in Pennsylvania Dutch has not been systematically documented. To account for these findings, we propose, as most recently suggested by Putnam and Sánchez (2013), an analysis of feature reconfiguration, with the result of progressive aspect appearing with different aspectual classes of verbs (most notably, with certain types of statives).
Keywords: aspect, convergence, feature reconfiguration, hyperextension, Pennsylvania Dutch, semantics, syntax
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 20 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.06bro
References
Andersson, Sven-Gunnar
1989 “On the Generalization of Progressive Constructions: ‘Ich bin (das Buch) am Lesen’ – Status and Usage in Three Varieties in German.” In Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Aspectology, ed. by Lars-Gunnar Larsson, 95–106. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate
1995 Situations, Tense and Aspect: Dynamic Discourse Ontology and the Semantic Flexibility of Temporal System in German and English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Bergliot, Monique Flecken and Mary Carroll
2013 “Progressive Attraction: On the Use and Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Dutch, Norwegian, and German.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25(2): 95–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia
1991 Morphology After Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Brown, Joshua R.
2011 Religious Identity and Language Shift Among Amish-Mennonites in Kishacoquillas Valley, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate
1992 “Creating Grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario.” In Diachronic Studies on the Languages of the Anabaptists, ed. by Kate Burridge and Werner Enninger, 199–241. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory
1977 Reference to Kinds in English. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts-Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979/1991 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio and Michael Putnam
2013 “Parasitic Semantics (or Why Swedish Can’t Lexicalize Middle Voice Constructions).” Proceedings of the Penn Linguistics Colloquium 36 19(1): 51–58.Google Scholar
2014 “The Emergence of Middle Voice Structures With and Without Agents.” The Linguistic Review 31(2): 193–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Janet
1996 “When Cultural Maintenance Means Linguistic Convergence: Pennsylvania German Evidence for the Matrix Language Turnover Hypothesis.” Language in Society 25: 493–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gachelin, Jean-Marc
1997 “The Progressive and Habitual Aspects in Non-Standard Englishes.” In Englishes Around the World: Studies in Honour of Manfred Gorlach, vol. 1, ed. by Edgar W. Schneider, 33–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken and Jay Keyser
2005 “Aspect and the Syntax of Argument Structure.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapport, 11–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
2009 Tense, Aspect, and Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Robert
1993 “German Immigration and the Development of Regional Variants of American English: Using Contact Theory to Discover our Roots.” In The German Language in America, ed. by Joseph Salmons, 190–212. Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. Lois
1986 “The Function of Aspect in Pennsylvania German and the Impact of English.” Yearbook for German – American Studies 21: 137–154.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon
1969 “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations.” In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, ed. by Nicholas Rescher, 198–215. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 “Events as Property Exemplifications.” In Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, ed. by Myles Brand and Douglas Walton, 159–177. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Königs, Karin
1995 “Zur Übersetzung der Verlaufsform ins Deutsche.” Lebende Sprache 4: 153–158.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred
1992 “The Progressive.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Mark
1988 Bilingualism and Syntactic Change in Pennsylvania German. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2003 Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “On the Limits of the Davidsonian Approach: The Case of Copula Sentences.” Theoretical Linguistics 31(3): 275–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Philippe
1997 “Tense-Aspect-Mood in Principense.” In The structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles: Including Selected Papers from the Meetings of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, ed. by Arthur K. Spears and Donald Winford, 415–435. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, Silvina
2002 “Incomplete Acquisition and Attrition of Spanish Tense/Aspect Distinctions in Adult Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Incomplete Acquisition of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish Heritage Speakers.” International Journal of Bilingualism 13(3): 239–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
1997 “American Russian: Language Loss Meets Language Acquisition.” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic 19 Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting (1995), ed. by Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornsich, Natasha Kondrashova and Draga Zec, 370–406. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers.Google Scholar
2006 “Incomplete Acquisition: American Russian.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14: 191–262.Google Scholar
2008 “Without Aspect.” In Case and Grammatical Relations, ed. by Greville G. Corbett and Michael P. Noonan, 263–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Michael and Liliana Sánchez
2013 “What So Incomplete About Incomplete Acquisition? A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Grammars.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4): 478–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone
1997 “Progressive Periphrases, Markedness, and Second Language Data.” In Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen, ed. by Stig Eliasson and Ernst Hakon Jahr, 261–286. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Carroll
1947 “The Question of Aspect in Pennsylvania German.” The Germanic Review 22: 5–12.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah Julianne
1999 “The TMA System of Hawaiian Creole and Diffusion.” In Creole Genesis, Attitudes, and Discourse: Studies Celebrating Charlene J. Sato, ed. by John R. Rickford and Suzanne Romaine, 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1972 “Act.” In Semantics of Natural Language, ed. by David Davidson and Gilbert Herman, 76–120. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia
2009 The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2004 Structuring Events. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana
2003 Quechua-Spanish Bilingualism: Interference and Convergence in Functional Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Functional Convergence in the Tense, Evidentiality and Aspectual Systems of Quechua Spanish Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
1993 “On the Permeability of Grammars: Evidence from Spanish and English Contact.” In Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages, ed. by William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun and Giorgio Perissinotto, 19–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994/2000 Language Contact and Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2006 “Gradedness and Optionality in Mature and Developing Grammars.” In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspective, ed. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel and Matthais Schlesewsky, 106–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara and Dieter Wunderlich
1994 “Morphology Feeds Syntax: The Case of Particle Verbs.” Linguistics 32(6): 913–968. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroik, Thomas and Michael Putnam
2013 The Structural Design of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barry
1977 “Tense and Continuity.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1(2): 199–220.Google Scholar
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline
2004 “Convergence as an Optimization Strategy in Bilingual Speech: Evidence from Code-Switching.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 165–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Pottelberge, Jeroen
2004 Der am-Progressive: Struktur und parallele Entwicklung in den kontinentalwestgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2007 “Defining Grammatical Constructions as a Linguistic Sign: The Case of Periphrastic Progressives in the Germanic Languages.” Folia Linguistica 41: 99–134.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 “Verbs and Times.” The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967 Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Heritage Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58], Crossref logo
Blevins, Margaret
2018.  In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Pierce, Marc, Hans C. Boas & Karen A. Roesch
2015.  In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Westergaard, Marit & Merete Anderssen
2015.  In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.