Article published in:
Language Variation - European Perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7), Trondheim, June 2013
Edited by Eivind Torgersen, Stian Hårstad, Brit Mæhlum and Unn Røyneland
[Studies in Language Variation 17] 2015
► pp. 69–86

Word order variation and foregrounding of complement clauses

Exploring the meaning of sentence adverbials as signals of word order

Through mixed models analyses of complement clauses in a corpus of spoken Danish we examine the role of sentence adverbials in relation to a word order distinction in Scandinavian signalled by the relative position of sentence adverbials and finite verb (V>Adv vs. Adv>V). The type of sentence adverbial was the third-most important factor in explaining the word order variation: Sentence adverbials categorized as ‘dialogic’ are significantly associated with V>Adv word order. We argue that the results are readily interpretable in the light of the semantico-pragmatic hypothesis that V>Adv signals foregrounded information, and exploit the random intercepts assigned to the individual adverbials for further exploring the functions of sentence adverbials that behave unexpectedly based on the predictions of the model.
Keywords: foregrounding, random intercepts, sentence adverbials, word order
Published online: 09 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.17.06kar
References

References

Aelbrecht, Lobke, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye
2012 Main Clause Phenomena. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2007 “Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure.” Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tanya K., and Lars Heltoft
2010 “Mood in Danish.” In Mood in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff, 85–102. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tanya Karoli
2007 Hyperparadigmer – en undersøgelse af paradigmatiske samspil i danske modussystemer, Roskilde Universitetscenter.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003 Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels
1996 “Discourse particles in Danish.” In Content, Expression and Structure. Studies in Danish functional grammar, ed. by Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder, Lars Heltoft & Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen, 283–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul
1946 Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R.
1980 “Variation in Discourse: ‘And Stuff like That’.” Language in Society 9(1): 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, and Jennifer Hay
2012 “Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics.” Language Variation and Change 24(1): 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas B.
2002 The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2000 From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans
2009 “The data and design of the LANCHART study.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41: 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft
2011 Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1997 “Adverbs in functional grammar.” In Toward a functional lexicology, ed. by Gerd Wotjak, 121–136. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2007 “Embedded root phenomena.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. II, ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 174–209. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Antonella Sorace, and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
2010 “V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: an investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish.” Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 13: 67–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B., and Sandra A. Thompson
1973 “On the applicability of root transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Jensen, Torben Juel, and Tanya Karoli Christensen
2013 “Promoting the demoted: The distribution and semantics of “main clause word order” in spoken Danish complement clauses.” Lingua 137: 38–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit
2007 “Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish.” Working papers in scandinavian syntax 80: 103–161.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky
1971 “Fact.” In Semantics An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krylova, Elvira
2005 “Epistemisk polyfoni i danske modalpartikler.” Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer 4: 75–87.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999 Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That. General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise
1996 “'Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det' - Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger i danske dialekter.” In Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt. Til Inger Ejskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, ed. by Inger Ejskjær, Bent Jul Nielsen & Inge Lise Pedersen, 242–251. København: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Derek Denis
2010 “The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada.” Journal of English Linguistics 38(2): 335–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and R. Harald Baayen
2012 “Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Therkelsen, Rita
2004 “Polyfoni som sproglig begrebsramme og som redskab i tekstanalysen.” Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer I: 79–109.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002 ““Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account.” Studies in Language 26: 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991 “The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.” Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voller, Inge
2002 “Die Modalpartikeln auf Deutsch und Dänisch - eine kontrastive Analyse.” Hermes 28: 135–154.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, and Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir
2009 “On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses.” Lingua 119: 1914–1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar