Article published in:Advances in Sociophonetics
Edited by Chiara Celata and Silvia Calamai
[Studies in Language Variation 15] 2014
► pp. 17–28
The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner
This paper is an effort to define the phonetic target of the language learner: what are the data that the child focuses on in becoming a native speaker? A number of studies are reviewed to show that children reject the idiosyncratic features of their parents’ phonetic system if they do not match the pattern of the larger speech community: in the acquisition of the Philadelphia and New York City dialects; the formation of a new dialect in Milton Keynes; the spread of the low back merger in eastern New England; the reduction of the future marker in Tok Pisin. The end result is a high degree of uniformity in both the categorical and variable aspects of language, where individual variation is reduced below the level of linguistic significance.
Published online: 12 June 2014
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 “Stability and change across a dialect boundary: the low vowels of southeastern New England”. Publications of the American Dialect Society 95.
Kerswill, Paul & Anne Williams
1969 “Sociolinguistics and the individual”. Te Reo 12. 41–47.
Le Page, Robert B. & Andree Tabouret-Keller.
Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau
Sankoff, Gillian & Suzanne Laberge
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
Cited by other publications
Blaxter, Tam, Kate Beeching, Richard Coates, James Murphy & Emily Robinson
Dressler, Wolfgang U., F. Nihan Ketrez & Marianne Kilani-Schoch
Ortiz López, Luis A., Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo & Melvin González-Rivera
Tamminga, Meredith, Laurel MacKenzie & David Embick
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.