Article published in:
Language Variation – European Perspectives: Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), Amsterdam, June 2005Edited by Frans L. Hinskens
[Studies in Language Variation 1] 2006
► pp. 233–248
Polarisation revisited
Published online: 30 November 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.1.15tae
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.1.15tae
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Aliūkaitė, Daiva
2019. Objektyvusis tarmiškumas: požymiai ir vertė.
Respectus Philologicus 35:40 ► pp. 63 ff. 
Hinskens, Frans L.
2014.
In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact [Studies in Language Variation, 16],
► pp. 109 ff.
Hinskens, Frans L.
2020.
In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24],
► pp. 55 ff.
Jaspers, Jürgen & Sarah Van Hoof
2015. Ceci n'est pas une Tussentaal: Evoking Standard and Vernacular Language Through Mixed Dutch in Flemish Telecinematic Discourse.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kühl, Karoline & Kurt Braunmüller
2014.
In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact [Studies in Language Variation, 16],
► pp. 13 ff.
Lybaert, Chloé
2017. A direct discourse-based approach to the study of language attitudes: The case of tussentaal in Flanders.
Language Sciences 59 ► pp. 93 ff.
Mikulėnienė, Danguolė
2019. Tarmiškumo bruožų nomenklatūra: nuo tarminių požymių prie tarmiškumo žymenų.
Respectus Philologicus 35:40 ► pp. 51 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.