Chapter published in:
Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian
Edited by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Hjalmar P. Petersen and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 1] 2017
► pp. 200–232

Inverse attraction in Icelandic relative clauses

| Yale University
| University of Pennsylvania
| University of Iceland
We introduce “inverse attraction” (IA) (Bianchi 1999: 93) in non-standard Icelandic, a nearly unstudied phenomenon that provides special insight into relative clause formation, specificially regarding the copy deletion that occurs in the “matching analysis” derivation of relatives. Descriptively, IA seems to involve deletion of the higher, rather than the lower copy of the relative head. In order to study this phenomenon in more detail, we conducted a judgment study with 130 Icelandic-speaking participants. The results of our study indicate that the acceptability of IA depends on the matrix and embedded cases involved, on the position of the gap inside the relative clause, and on the position of the whole relativized DP.
Keywords: inverse attraction, matching analysis, relative clauses, judgment data, case, Icelandic
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.08woo
References

References

Åfarli, Tor A.
1994 “A Promotion Analysis of Restrictive Relative Clauses.” Linguistic Review 11: 81–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2002 “The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification.” Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
1999 Consequences of Antisymmetry. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000a “Some Issues in the Syntax of Relative Determiners.” In The Syntax of Relative Clauses, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, André Meinunger, Paul Law, and Chris Wilder, 53–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000b “The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley.” Linguistic Inquiry 31 (1): 123–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973 “Conditions on Transformations.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1977 “On wh-Movement.” In Formal Syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel
2005 “Comparative Correlatives Comparatively.” Linguistic Inquiry 36 (4): 497–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, Doreen, and Martin Salzmann
2014 “Case Attraction and Matching in Resumption: Evidence for Top-Down Derivation.” Paper presented at the 29th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop, York University.
Hulsey, Sarah, and Uli Sauerland
2006 “Sorting Out Relative Clauses.” Natural Language Semantics 14: 111–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L, and Bernard Comrie
1977 “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1): 63–99.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2000 “Case and Licensing.” In Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, ed. by Eric Reuland, 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard
1974 “English as a Formal Language.” In Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed. by Richmond H. Thomason, 188–226. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H.
1975 “Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 6 (2): 203–300.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin
1995 “The Case of German Relatives.” The Linguistic Review 12: 197–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur
1993 “Coordination, ATB-Extractions, and the Identification of Pro.” Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 153–180.Google Scholar
1995 “Setningafræði. 7. kafli: Spurnarfærsla.” [‘Syntax. Chapter 7. wh-movement.’] Unpublished class notes, accessible at https://​notendur​.hi​.is​/eirikur​/setn95k7​.htm.
2005 “Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku.” [‘Syntactic changes in Icelandic.’] In Setningar – Handbók um setningafræði [‘Sentences. A handbook on syntax.’], editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, 602–635. Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli
1998 The Meaning of Chains. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1973 “Focus and Relativization.” Language 49: 19–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T.
1997 INFL in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, Case and Licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland, Reykjavík 1992.]Google Scholar
2012 “Minimalist C/case.” Linguistic Inquiry 43 (2): 191–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Srivastav, Veneeta
1991 “The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 637–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Ásta Svavarsdóttir, and Þórunn Blöndal
2015 “Fallmörkun.” [‘Case marking.’]. In Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð II [‘Variation in Icelandic syntax II.’], ed. by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Ásgrímur Angantýsson and Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, 33–76. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1974 French Relative Clauses. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff
1987 “Case in Tiers.” Language 63 (2): 217–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Czypionka, Anna, Laura Dörre & Josef Bayer
2018. Inverse Case attraction: experimental evidence for a syntactically guided process. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 june 2019. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.