Chapter published in:
Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian
Edited by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Hjalmar P. Petersen and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 1] 2017
► pp. 92–112

Determining the nature of intra-speaker subject case variation

Extensive syntactic surveys show that variation in subject case appears in both Insular Scandinavian languages. The results furthermore indicate that intra-speaker variation is widespread and that Person-Specific Retention (PSR) is one of the characteristics of the variation in both Icelandic and Faroese. Many questions on the nature of the variation remain unanswered and no formal account of the PSR has been provided. In this paper I shed light on the subject by presenting new data from Icelandic, Faroese and heritage North-American Icelandic. Experimental language acquisition data can be particularly decisive regarding the nature of the intra-speaker variation and the variation and PSR can be accounted for formally within Yang’s (2002, 2016) variational model of acquisition.
Keywords: language change, language acquisition, variation in subject case, Dative b-Substitution, variational learning framework, Tolerance Principle, Icelandic, heritage Icelandic, Faroese
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.04now
References

References

Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna
2006 North-American Icelandic. The Life of a Language. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Björgvinsdóttir, Ragnheiður
2003 Frumlagsfall í máli barna. [‘Subject case in child language.’] Unpublished BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harold, Sonja Eisenbeiß and Anne Vainikka
1994 “The Seeds of Structure.” In Studies in Generative Grammar, ed. by Teun Hoekstra and Bonnie Schwartz, 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Einarsdóttir, Jóhanna
2014 Gagnabanki Jóhönnu Einarsdóttur um málsýni (GJEUM). [‘Jóhanna Einarsdóttir’s data bank.’]Google Scholar
Erlingsdóttir, Gyða
2010 Hún finnst ekki tannkrem gott. Um fallmörkun frumlaga í barnamáli. [‘She doesn’t like toothpaste. On subject case marking in child language.’] Unpublished BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark
2007 Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ingason, Anton K.
2011 “A Death Rattle Hypothesis for Minority Rules.” Poster presented at DiGS 13, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, and Thórhallur Eythórsson
2005 “Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28 (2): 223–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
2013 “Two Types of Case Variation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (1): 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989 “Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Syntactic Change.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ed. by Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999 The Development of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nowenstein, Iris
2012 Mig langar sjálfri til þess. Rannsókn á innri breytileika í fallmörkun frumlaga. [‘I want that myself. Investigation of intra-speaker variation in subject case marking.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [Accessible at http://​skemman​.is​/item​/view​/1946​/12885.]
2014 “Intra-speaker Variation in Subject Case: Icelandic.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 20(1), Article 28.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1995 “Why the Child Holded the Baby Rabbit. A Case Study in Language Acquisition.” In An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language, ed. by Lila Gleitman and Mark Liberman, 107–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson, and Jon Sprouse
2014 “Judgment Data.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. by Robert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, 27–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sigurðardóttir, Herdís Þ.
2002 Fall í íslensku. Hvernig læra íslensk börn að nota föll? [‘Case in Icelandic. How do Icelandic children acquire case?’] Unpublished MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta
1982 “ ‘Þágufallssýki’.” [‘“Dative sickness”.’] Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
2013 “Þágufallshneigð í sjón og raun. Niðurstöður spurningakannana í samanburði við málnotkun.” [‘Dative substitution, apparent and real. The results from questionnaires compared to language use.’] In Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð I, ed. by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Ásgrímur Angantýsson and Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, 83–110. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2013 “Ideal Speakers and Other Speakers. The Case of Dative and Other Cases.” In Variation in Datives – A Micro-Comparative Perspective, ed. by Beatriz Fenández and Ricardo Etxepare, 161–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2002 Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005 “On Productivity.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 265–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar