Article published in:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 17:1 (2020) ► pp. 5883
References

References

Agostini, Tainara D. and Scott A. Schwenter
2018 “Variable Negative Concord in Brazilian Portuguese: Acceptability and Frequency.” In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2015, ed. by Jonathan E. MacDonald, 71–94. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arjona, Marina
1990 “El adverbio muy y otros intensificadores en el habla popular de México.” Anuario de Letras 28: 75–96.Google Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat and M. Lluïsa Hernanz
2009 “En torno a la polaridad enfática en español y en catalán: un estudio diacrónico y comparativo.” In Diachronic Linguistics, ed. by Joan Rafel, 319–352. Girona: Documenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
2013 “Emphatic Polarity Particles in Spanish and Catalan.” Lingua 128: 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, David, Libby M. Gertken, and Mark Amengual
2012Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. Web 20 Jan. 2012 <https://​sites​.la​.utexas​.edu​/bilingual/.
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2004 “El español actual en las comunidades del ámbito lingüístico catalán.” In Historia de la lengua española, ed. by Rafael Cano Aguilar, 1065–1086. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2008 “The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The Present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region.” Language Variation and Change 20: 85–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Spanish in Contact with Catalan.” In The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 374–394. Malden, MA: Oxford-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Esther L. and Mayra Cortés-Torres
2013 “Puerto Rican Intensifiers: Bien/muy variables .” In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. by Ana Maria Carvalho and Sara Beaudrie, 11–19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2006 “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82: 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cuenca, Maria-Josep and Marín, Maria-Josep
2009 “Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in Catalan and Spanish Oral Narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 899–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. and Stefanie Wulff
2015 “Usage-based Approaches to SLA.” In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd ed.), ed. by Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams, 75–93. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enrique-Arias, Andrés
2010 “On Language Contact as an Inhibitor of Language Change.” In Continuity and Change in Grammar, ed. by Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts, and David Willis, 97–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2003 “A Comparison of Copula Choice in Advanced and Native Spanish.” Language Learning 53: 703–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Manuel
1995 “On the Future of the Future Tense in the Spanish of the Southwest.” In Spanish in Four Continents: Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism, ed. by Carmen Silva-Corvalán, 214–223. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2014 “The Three Adnominal Possessive Constructions in Egyptian-Coptic: Three Degrees of Grammaticalization.” In Egyptian-Coptic Linguistics in Typological Perspective, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Eitan Grossman, and Tonio S. Richter, 262–285. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Andrea D. Sims
2010Understanding Morphology (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
1995 Bien y la polaridad positiva en español. Estudio inédito.Google Scholar
2010 “Assertive Bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery.” In Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 5, ed. by Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro, 19–62. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Institut d’Estudis Catalans
2017Gramàtica de la llengua catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika and Sali Tagliamonte
2003 “ Well Weird, Right Dodgy, Very Strange, Really Cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers.” Language in Society 32: 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E.
2009 “Getting off the Goldvarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, Matthew, Virginia Terán, and Silvia Pisabarro Sarrió
2017 “ Un fenómeno bien curioso: New Methods for Analyzing Variable Intensification Across Four Dialects of Spain and Argentina.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10: 259–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klee, Carol A. and Andrew Lynch
2009El español en contacto con otras lenguas. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1978 “Where Does the Linguistic Variable Stop? A Response to Beatriz Lavandera.” In Working Papers in Sociolinguistics (Vol. 44). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
2001Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R.
1978 “Where Does the Sociolinguistic Variable Stop?Language in Society 7: 171–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2009 “Replication, Transfer, and Calquing: Using Variation as a Tool in the Study of Language Contact.” Language Variation and Change 21: 297–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana and Sali Tagliamonte
2001African American English in the Diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pradilla, Miquel Ángel
2001 “The Catalan-speaking Communities.” In Multinguialism in Spain: Sociolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects of Linguistic Minority Groups, ed. by M. Teresa Turell, 58–90. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1984 “On the Problem of Syntactic Variation and Pragmatic Meaning in Sociolinguistic Theory.” Folia Linguistica 18: 409–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvador Salvador, Francisco
1987 “La gradación adjetiva en el habla popular de Ciudad de México.” Actas del I Congreso Internacional del Español de América, 419–430. San Juan de Puerto Rico: Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David and Pierrette Thibault
1981 “Weak Complementarity: Tense and Aspect in Montreal French.” In Syntactic Change, ed. by Brenda B. Johns and David R. Strong, 206–216. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Shana Poplack, and Swathi Vanniarajan
1990 “The Case of the Nonce Loan in Tamil.” Language Variation and Change 2: 71–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
1973 “Above and Beyond Phonology in Variable Rules.” In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, ed. by Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy, 44–61. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. and Rena Torres Cacoullos
2008 “Defaults and Indeterminacy in Temporal Grammaticalization: The “Perfect” Road to Perfective.” Language Variation and Change 20: 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes
2002–2004 “Este tema es muy/bien interesante.” Archivo de filología aragonesa 59–60: 859–873.Google Scholar
Serradilla Castaño, Ana
2006 “Bien + adjetivo como perífrasis de superlativo en español. Particularidades semánticas y sintácticas.” Verba 33: 215–233.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2008 “So Different and Pretty Cool! Recycling Intensifiers in Toronto, Canada.” English Language and Linguistics 12: 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Catherine E. Travis
2010 “Testing Convergence via Code-Switching: Priming and the Structure of Variable Subject Expression.” International Journal of Bilingualism 15: 241–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vann, Robert E.
1998 “Pragmatic Transfer from Less developed to More Developed Systems: Spanish Deictic Terms in Barcelona.” In Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives, ed. by Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, 307–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar