Article published in:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 13:2 (2016) ► pp. 212–236

Remembering and noticing

A conversation-analytic study of ‘ah’ in Mexican Spanish talk

The present investigation uses the methodology of Conversation Analysis to study the particle ah in Mexican Spanish interactions. It looks at ah as a change-of-state token in remembering and noticing sequences. Similar to previous studies (e.g., Edwards and Middleton 1986; Goodwin 1987; and Drew 1989), this investigation aims to show how cognitive processes are socially organised in interaction. Three types of remembering sequences are identified and described: assisted, metacognitive, and spontaneous remembering. It is suggested that in these type of sequences, ah marks the end of the cognitive process which is completed either with external help or with metacognitive strategies. In noticing formulations, ah marks the realisation of something, it prefaces a noticing formulation which may work as a topic initiator or it may initiate the closing of a sequence. A noticing formulation may also work as an account of action.
Keywords: ah, particles, interjections, noticing, remembering, Spanish interactions
Published online: 15 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.2.03vaz
References

References

Alonso-Cortés, A.
1999 “Las construcciones exclamativas. La interjección y las expresiones vocativas.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, ed. by I. Bosque and V. Demonte, 3993–4051. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Button, Graham, and Neil Casey
1985 “Topic Nomination and Topic Pursuit.” Human Studies 8: 3–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2001 “Meaning in Interaction: The Case of Actually .” Language 77 (2): 245–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1989 “Recalling Someone from the Past.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by D. Roger and P. Bull, 96–115. Exeter: Intercommunications.Google Scholar
Edeso Natalías, Verónica
2009 Contribución al uso de la interjección en español. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and David J. Middleton
1986 “Joint Remembering: Constructing an Account of Shared Experience through Conversational Discourse.” Discourse Processes 9 (4): 423–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 “Conversational Remembering and Family Relationships: How Children Learn to Remember.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5: 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1987 “Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 115–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Sacks, Emanuel. A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”. Language, 50: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Actions, ed. by J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 “ Oh-prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1993 “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2013 “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“Oh That’s Right”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 277–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Zorraquillo, M.A., and Lázaro Portolés
1999 “Los marcadores del discurso.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, ed. by I. Bosque and V. Demonte, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Middleton, David J., and Derek Edwards
1990 “Conversational Remembering: A Social Psychological Approach.” In Collective Remembering, ed. by D. Middleton and D. Edwards, 23–46. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (RAE)
2001 Diccionario de la lengua española, Vigésimo segunda edición. Accessed 28 June 2013. http://​www​.rae​.es​/rae​.html.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II, ed. by G. Jefferson, with an introduction by E. Schegloff. Cornwall: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santos Río, L.
2003 Diccionario de Partículas. Salamanca: Luso-Española.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-taking Organization.” In Talk and Social Orgnization, ed. by G. Button and J.R. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Prime in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Carranza, A.
2012 “ O sea in Talk: A Study of Mexican Spanish Interactions.” Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics 13: 158–188.Google Scholar
2013 “Responding and Clarifying: An Analysis of pues as a Sequential Marker in Mexican Spanish Talk-in-interactions.” Spanish in Context 10 (2): 284–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel
Forthcoming. “Aceptación y resistencia: un análisis de ‘ah’ y ‘ay’ como indicadores de cambio de estado”. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México.
Vázquez Carranza, A.
2015 “Análisis conversacional de ‘a poco’ en el habla cotidiana.” Coloquio Rumbos de la Lingüística V, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, México DF. Accessed 24 April 2015. http://​www​.academia​.edu​/11691517​/An%C3%A1lisis​_conversacional​_de​_a​_poco​_en​_el​_habla​_cotidiana.Google Scholar
Vázquez Veiga, N.
2003 Marcadores discursivos de recepción. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Servicio de publicaciones.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

García-Ramón, Amparo
2018. Indexing epistemic incongruence: uy as a formal sign of disagreement in agreement sequences in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 131 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pascual Escagedo, Consuelo
2019. La partícula mmh Análisis descriptivo del uso de la partícula mmh en las conversaciones de estudiantes italianos de ELE. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 5:2 ► pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.