Article published in:
Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters: Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras
Edited by Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Elena Valenzuela and Cristina Martínez Sanz
[Studies in Bilingualism 51] 2016
► pp. 149185
References

References

Betancourt, M., Carreira, M., & Sturt, P.
(2009) The Processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1915–1929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M., & Montrul, S.
(2009) Instructed L2 acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish. In R. Leow, H. Campos, & D. Lardiere (Eds.). Little Words. Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition (pp. 199–110). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2008) The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, S., Pearlemutter, N., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A.
(1997) The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Sentence matching: A reexamination. Second Language Research, 17, 412–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey A.
(2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P.
(2011) Feature composition in differential object marking. EUROSLA Yearbook, 11, 138–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.
(1989) Do second language learners acquire restrictive clauses on the basis of relational or configurational information? The acquisition of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive relative clauses by second language learners. Second Language Research, 5, 158–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2006) Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A. C. J., & Pollock J.
(2001) Subject position in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. In A. C. J, Hulk. & J. Pollock (Eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kanno, K.
(2007) Factors affecting the processing of Japanese relative clauses by L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 197–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E.
(2013) The comprehension of words and sentences in two languages. In T. K, Bhatia. & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.). The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism (2nd Ed.; pp. 216–243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liceras, J.
(1986) Linguistic Theory and Second Language Acquisition: The Spanish Nonnative Grammar of English Speakers. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(1988) Learnability: Delimiting the domain of core grammar as distinct from the marked periphery. In S. Flynn & W. A. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 199–224). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mack, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H.
(2002) The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 50–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2004) The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. A.
(2009) Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 363–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W.
(1997) Syntactic Development. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M.
(2001) The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and non heritage learners of Korean as a second language. A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education, 12, 283–294.Google Scholar
(2003) A subject–object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 433–448.Google Scholar
Ordoñez, F.
(2000) The Clausal Structure of Spanish: A Comparative Study. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(2011) Reanalysis in adult heritage language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H.
(2007) The Importance of Cross-linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning: Comprehension, Learning, and Production. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarallo, F., & Myhill, J.
(1983) Interference and natural language processing in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 33(1), 55–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K.
(2002) The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sagarra, Nuria, Liliana Sánchez & Aurora Bel
2019. Processing DOM in relative clauses. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:1  pp. 120 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.