Article published in:Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
Edited by Patrick Rebuschat
[Studies in Bilingualism 48] 2015
► pp. 91–116
What does current generative theory have to say about the explicit-implicit debate?
Taking a generative perspective, we divide aspects of language into three broad categories: those that cannot be learned (are inherent in Universal Grammar), those that are derived from Universal Grammar, and those that must be learned from the input. Using this framework of language to clarify the “what” of learning, we take the acquisition of null (and overt) subjects in languages like Spanish as an example of how to apply the framework. We demonstrate what properties of a null-subject grammar cannot be learned explicitly, which properties can, but also argue that it is an open empirical question as to whether these latter properties are learned using explicit processes, showing how linguistic and psychological approaches may intersect to better understand acquisition.
Published online: 24 September 2015
Cited by other publications
Bayram, Fatih & Jason Rothman
Martin, Ines A. & Carrie N. Jackson
McManus, Kevin & Emma Marsden
Pinto, Manuela & Shalom Zuckerman
Rastelli, Stefano & Kook-Hee Gil
Sepehrinia, Sajjad, Majid Nemati & Ali Akbar Khomijani Farahani
Umeda, Mari, Neal Snape, Noriaki Yusa & John Wiltshier
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2002) The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
de Graff, R.
De Jong, N.
Jegerski, J., VanPatten, B. & Keating, G.D.
Leow, R.P., Johnson, E., & Zárate-Sández, G.
(2011) Getting a grip on the slippery construct of awareness: Toward a finer grained methodological perspective. In C. Sanz & R.P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 61–72). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Liceras, J.M., Díaz, L., & Maxwell, D.
(1984) After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns. Unpublished PhD dissertation. MIT.
(2008) Does emergentism have a chance? In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), BUCLD 32: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 16–35). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & Glass, W.
Pullum, G., & Scholz, B.
Rothman, J. & Iverson, M.
Rothman, J. & VanPatten, B.
Shin, N.L. & Cairns, H.S.
Smith, M. & VanPatten, B.
forthcoming). Why parameters still matter in SLA: A study on the earliest stages of Japanese L2.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
in press). Mental representation and skill in instructed SLA. In J. Schwieter (Ed.) Innovations in SLA, bilingualism, and cognition: Research and practice Amsterdam John Benjamins
VanPatten, B., Keating, G.D., & Leeser, M.J.
VanPatten, B. & Williams, J.
Whong, M. Gil, K.H. & Marsden, H.