Article published in:
Current Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and cognitive perspectivesEdited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Elsa M. González Álvarez
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 60] 2008
► pp. 3–26
Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs verbal strategies
Anna Siewierska | Lancaster University, UK
The term impersonal is used in the literature to denote subjectless constructions, constructions featuring only a pleonastic subject, and constructions which lack a specified agent. This chapter focuses on the third of these types, which are often expressed in languages by the non-personal use of personal pronouns (pronominal impersonals) or by agentless passives, reflexive impersonals and participial impersonals (here designated by the cover term ‘verbal impersonals’). This chapter compares the use of pronominal impersonals, in particular that of the third person plural with verbal impersonals, with respect to their referential range. Adopting the principles of grammaticalization, I argue that third person plural constructions are more referentially restricted than their verbal counterparts.
Published online: 17 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
No author info given
Achard, Michel
Garcia, Brigitte, Marie-Anne Sallandre & Marie-Thérèse L’Huillier
Johansson, Annika & Gudrun Rawoens
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
Skorupa, Pavel & Tatjana Dubovičienė
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.