Learning the Language of Dentistry

Disciplinary corpora in the teaching of English for Specific Academic Purposes

| University of Queensland
| The University of Hong Kong
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027204271 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027261984 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book explores the affordances of disciplinary corpora for the teaching and learning of the language of dentistry, within the field of English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP). We extract disciplinary register features and vocabulary from three key genres of the dentistry discipline (published experimental research articles, case reports, and novice/professional research reports within the Dental Public Health domain), before integrating these features into ESAP pedagogy in the form of corpus-based ESAP materials that promote student-led direct engagement with disciplinary corpora – an approach known as 'data-driven learning'. This book is a timely and relevant addition to the field of corpus linguistics and ESAP, and is especially targeted at ESAP professionals who are required to teach disciplinary discourses but who may struggle to know what to teach as non-experts of the target discipline.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 93]  2019.  xiv, 222 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.93
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ix
Foreword: Corpora and specialised English in the university curriculum
Ken Hyland
xi–xiv
Chapter 1. Getting to the ‘root’ of the problem: Introduction to the volume
1–23
Section 1. The language of dentistry – A corpus-based exploration of language features across the dentistry register
27–112
Chapter 2. ‘Extracting’ the linguistic dimensions of dentistry experimental research articles
27–200
Chapter 3. Persuasive stories? Professional and novice research reports for Dental Public Health
55–80
Chapter 4. Understanding disciplinary vs. non-disciplinary terminology: Insights from the dentistry case report genre
81–112
Section 2. Applying corpus insights for ESAP pedagogy
113–188
Chapter 5. Data-driven dentistry: Corpora, ESAP, and writing-to-learn
115–150
Chapter 6. Putting it into (dental) practice: User engagement with dentistry corpora and DDL
151–173
Chapter 7. Reflections on practice, and future directions
175–188
References
202–203
Language Features in EFA Model (Chapter 2)
205–217
Index
References

References

Ädel, A.
(2010) Using corpora to teach academic writing: Challenges for the direct approach. In M. C. Campoy-Cubillo, B. Belles-Fortuño, & L. Gea-Valor (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to ELT (pp.39–55). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ädel, A., & Garretson, G.
(2006) Citation practices across disciplines: The case of proficient student writing. In M. C. Pérez-Llantada Auría, R. Pló Alastrué, & C. P. Neumann (Eds.), Academic and professional communication in the 21st century: Genres and rhetoric in the construction of disciplinary knowledge (pp.271–280). Zaragoza, Spain: Prensas Universitarias.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., & Passonneau, R.
(2011, June) Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the workshop on languages in social media (pp.30–38). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aldabe, I.
(2011) Automatic exercise generation based on corpora and natural language processing techniques (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (University of the Basque Country), San Sebastian, Basque Country.Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, T., Michel, M., Murakami, A., & Meurers, D.
(2017) Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning, 67(S1), 180–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altman, D., & Mascarenhas, A. K.
(2016) New competencies for the 21st century dental public health specialist. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 76(s18–s28). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aluthman, E. S.
(2017) The impact of the data-driven learning approach on ESL writers’ citation patterns. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 109–122, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Amdur, R., Kirwan, J., & Morris C.
(2010) Use of the passive voice in medical journal articles. American Medical Writers Association Journal, 25(3), 98–110.Google Scholar
Anthony, L.
(2014) AntConc (version 3.4.4). [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/softwareGoogle Scholar
(2016) Introducing corpora and corpus tools into the technical writing classroom through data-driven learning. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline specific writing (pp.162–180). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017a) Introducing corpora and corpus tools into the technical writing classroom through data-driven learning (DDL). In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice (pp.162–180). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017b) AntFileConverter (version 1.2.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/softwareGoogle Scholar
(2018) Introduction. In L. Anthony (Ed.), Introducing English for Specific Purposes (pp.1–6). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Applebee, A.
(1996) Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aston, G.
(1995) Corpora in language pedagogy: matching theory and practice. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 257–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Athar, A.
(2011, June) Sentiment analysis of citations using sentence structure-based features. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 student session (pp.81–87). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z.
(2014) Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31, 151–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baisa, V., & Suchomel, V.
(2014, December) Skell: Web interface for english language learning. In A. Horák & P. Rychlý (Eds.), Eighth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2014 (pp.63–70). Brno: Tribun EU.Google Scholar
Barrón-Cedeño, A., Vila, M., Martí, M. A., & Rosso, P.
(2013) Plagiarism meets paraphrasing: Insights for the next generation in automatic plagiarism detection. Computational Linguistics, 39(4), 917–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, H.
(2012) A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, S.
(2011) Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 1(2), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(2002) Genre and identity: Citizenship in the age of the internet and the age of global capitalism. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp.13–37). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S.
(2001) Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In J. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp.15–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp.31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1994) Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In J. Aarts (Ed.), Corpus-based research into language (pp.201–222). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J.
(2007) Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. Language and Computers, 59, 109.Google Scholar
Birch-Becaas, S., & Cooke, R.
(2012) Raising collective awareness of rhetorical strategies: Using an online writing tool to demonstrative discourse moves in the ESP classroom. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications (pp.239–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. M. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp.41–68) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blue, G. M.
(1988) Individualising academic writing tuition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and product. Oxford: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Boulton, A.
(2011) Data-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (Ed.), Explorations across languages and corpora (pp.563–580). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015) Applying data-driven learning to the web. In A. Lénko-Szymánska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp.267–295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2012) Corpus consultation for ESP: A review of empirical research. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications (pp.261–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E.
(Eds.) (2012) Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T.
(2017) Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V.
(2018) Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R.
(1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, T.
(2000) The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 193–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. A., & McCarthy, M. J.
(1995) Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16, 141–158.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. M.
(2000) A corpus-linguistic investigation of dental English. Journal of Dental Education, 64(4), 283–293.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B.
(1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M., & Flowerdew, J.
(2018) Introducing data-driven learning to PhD students for research writing purposes: A territory-wide project in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 97–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A.
(2007) Popularising corpus consultation by language learners and teachers. In E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp.3–16). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A., & O’Sullivan, I.
(2004) Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16, 158–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2007) Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 289–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 35(1), 30–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Same task, different corpus: The role of personal corpora in EAP classes. In A. Lénko-Szymánska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp.131–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chun, C.
(2017) Critical literacy writing in ESP: Perspectives and approaches. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice (pp.181–195). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V.
(2008) ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T., & Boulton, A.
(2015) Classroom applications of corpus analysis. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp.478–497). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. M., & Hersh, W. R.
(2005) A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6(1), 57–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cortes, V.
(2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Genre and corpora in the English for academic writing class. ORTESOL Journal, 25, 9–16.Google Scholar
Cortes, V., & Csomay, E.
(Eds.) (2015) Corpus-based research in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of Doug Biber. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cotos, E.
(2014) Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL, 26(2), 202–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S.
(2017) Effects of technology on genre learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 104–130.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A.
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A., & Nation, P.
(2001) The specialised vocabulary of English for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp.252–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. M., Adami, G., Johnson, B. R., Knight, G. W., Knoernschild, K., Obrez, A., Patson, P., Punwani, I., Zaki, A. & Licari, F. W.
(2007) Curriculum restructuring at a North American dental school: rationale for change. Journal of Dental Education, 71(4), 524–531.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S.
(2016) The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1227–1237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Sentiment analysis and social cognition engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 803–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S., Russell, D., Kyle, K., & Römer, U.
(2017) Applying natural language processing tools to a student academic writing corpus: How large are disciplinary differences across science and engineering fields? Journal of Writing Analytics, 1, 48–81.Google Scholar
Crossley, S., Kyle, K. & Romer, U.
(2019) Examining lexical and cohesion differences in discipline-specific writing using multi-dimensional analysis. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.) Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp.189–216). London, UK: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P.
(2016) A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: Feedback and error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 447–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018, June 8) Scaling up DDL: Challenges of bringing DDL to an online SPOC format. Video conference paper presented at 2nd BAAL Corpus Linguistics SIG event 2018: New Directions in DDL. Centre for Academic Writing, Coventry University, UK.Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. K.
(2017) Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., & Jiang, K.
(2017) Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance? A longitudinal learner corpus study. System, 69, 92–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., Wong, L. L. C., & Cheung, O. W.
(2019) Characterising postgraduate students’ corpus query and usage patterns for disciplinary data-driven learning. ReCALL, online ahead of print, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dagneux, E., Denness, S., & Granger, S.
(1998) Computer-aided error analysis. System, 26, 163–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, T.
(2004) Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2004) BYU-BNC. Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press. Available online at http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bncGoogle Scholar
Ding, D.
(1998) Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In J. T. Battalio (Ed.), Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy (pp.117–135). Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N.
(2010) Register. In M. Fried, J. A. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Variation and change: Pragmatic perspectives (pp.221–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorgeloh, H.
(2016) The interrelationship of register and genre in medical discourse. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp.42–66). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorgeloh, H., & Wanner, A.
(2010) Syntactic variation and genre. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P.
(2017) Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 38(2), 165–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S.
(2011) Hong Kong English and the professional world. World Englishes, 30(3), 293–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., & Green, C.
(2007) Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., & Morrison, B.
(2011) The first term at university: Implications for EAP. English Language Teaching Journal, 65(4), 376–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
(2018, June) The hermeneutic cyborg. Conference abstract for 13th Annual Sinclair Open Lecture, June 25th , University of Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong
(2015) Regulations for the Degree of Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS). Retrieved from http://​facdent​.hku​.hk​/learning​/ug​_info​/BDS%206​-Year%20Regs%20and%20Sylls%202015​-16​-Dec2015​.pdf
Feldman, R., & Sanger, J.
(2007) The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G.
(1997) Teacher education and LSP: The role of specialised knowledge. In R. Howard & G. Brown (Eds.), Teacher education for Languages for Specific Purposes (pp.80–89). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
(2016) English for Specific Academic Purposes: Making the case. Writing and Pedagogy, 8(1), 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Costley
(Eds.) (2017) Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
(2015) Data-driven learning and language learning theories: Wither the twain shall meet. In A. Lénko-Szymánska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp.15–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A.
(2005) A peek into what today’s language learners as researchers actually do. International Journal of Lexicography, 18, 335–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J.
(2014) Conducting Biber's multi-dimensional analysis using SPSS. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: 25 years on (pp.297–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, D. L.
(2013) Exploring the dialogism of academic discourse: Heteroglossic engagement in medical research articles. In G. Andersen & K. Bech (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genre: Selected papers from International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (ICAME) (pp.183–207). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. C.
(2017) Form-focused data-driven learning for grammar development in ESP contexts. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23(1), 12–30.Google Scholar
Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T.
(2004) Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32, 301–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D.
(2018) Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavioli, L.
(2005) Exploring corpora for ESP learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2000) The integrated contrastive model: Spicing up your data. Languages in Contrast, 3, 95–123.Google Scholar
Gopikrishna, V.
(2010) A report on case reports. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 13(4), 265–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gotti, M., & Salager-Meyer, F.
(2006) Advances in medical discourse analysis: Written and oral contexts. Berlin: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
(1996) From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In K. Aijmer, Languages in contrast. Text-based cross-linguistic studies (pp.37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2015) On the complexity of academic writing: Disciplinary variation and structural complexity. In V. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based research in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of Doug Biber (pp.49–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gross, A. G., & Chesley, P.
(2012) Hedging, stance and voice in medical research articles. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp.85–100). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, C. A., & Candlin, C. N.
(2007) Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E.
(2016) Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 119–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Römer, U.
(2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P.
(2010) Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1(1), e5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, L. M., Rosenstock, L., & Gebbie, K.
(Eds.) (2003) Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Herrando-Rodrigo, I.
(2010) “If you suffer from … check the Internet”: The role of engagement and self-mention devices in medical research articles and electronic popularizations. In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas, & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic genres (pp.255–274). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E.
(2004) Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, A., Hyland, K., & Manchón, R. M.
(2016) Dimensions in L2 writing theory and research: Learning to write and writing to learn. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.45–64). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1988) Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, J. M., Elliot, N., Biber, C. L., & Sanders, R. M.
(2005) Computerized assessment of dental student writing skills. Journal of Dental Education, 69(2), 285–295.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M.
(1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, M., & Liu, B.
(2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp.168–177). Seattle, WA: ACM.Google Scholar
Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N. S., & Liu, L.
(2012) Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 674–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Murakami, A., Alexopoulou, T., & Korhonen, A.
(2018) Dependency parsing of learner English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(1), 28–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, B.
(2006) Form and representation in clinical case reports. Literature and Medicine, 25(2), 216–240.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A.
(1987) English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp.99–121). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
(2004a) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2004b) Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2007) Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Learning to write. In R. Manchón (ed.) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp.17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In K. Hyland & C. Sancho-Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp.134–150). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 240–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Re-imagining literacy: English in Hong Kong’s new university curriculum. In D. Coniam (Ed.), English language education and assessment (pp.139–151). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
(2016a) Writing with attitude: Conveying a stance in academic texts. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Teaching English grammar to speakers of other languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2016b) General and specific EAP. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp.41–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L.
(2002) EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F.
(2016a) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K.
(2016b) “We must conclude that …”: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2004) Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Academic lexis and disciplinary practice: Corpus evidence for specificity. International Journal of English Studies, 9(2).Google Scholar
James, M. A.
(2010) Transfer climate and EAP education: Students’ perceptions of challenges to learning to transfer. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 133–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) An investigation of motivation to transfer second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 51–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Paquot, M.
(2012) Exploring the role of n-grams in L1 identification. In S. Jarvis & S. Crossley (Eds.), Approaching language transfer through text classification: Explorations in the detection-based approach (pp.71–105). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S.
(2012) Mining electronic health records: Towards better research applications and clinical care. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(6), 395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K.
(2016) Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 508–531.Google Scholar
Johns, T.
(1991) Should you be persuaded – two examples of data-driven learning materials. In T. Johns, & P. King (Eds.), Classroom concordancing. English Language Research Journal (Vol. 4, pp.1–16). Birmingham: Birmingham University.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J.
(2009)  Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F.
(1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Vlachos, P., & Ishizaki, S.
(2006) Mining textual knowledge for writing education and research: The DocuScope project. In L. van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth, (Eds.), Writing and digital media (pp.115–129). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kaufer, D. S., Ishizaki, S., Butler, B. S., & Collins, J.
(2004) The power of words: Unveiling the speaker and writer's hidden craft. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kessler, J. S.
(2017) Scattertext: A browser-based tool for visualizing how corpora differ. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D.
(2004) The sketch engine. Information Technology, 105, 116.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G.
(2003) Introduction to the special issue on web as corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29, 333–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kostenko V.
(2016) Language and cultural barriers in written communication in dentistry. Akademia Pomorska w Slupsku, 4, 238–249.Google Scholar
Kostenko, V.
(2017) Pragmatic and communicative aspects of case reports in dentistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pomeranian University, Slupsk.Google Scholar
(2018) How to incorporate academic writing pedagogy in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 2, 261–265.Google Scholar
Kunter, G.
(2017) Coquery (version 0.10) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://​www​.coquery​.org/Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A.
(2015) Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1972) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, 183–228.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Z.
(2016) Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development / acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.48–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D., & Namenwirth, J. Z.
(1969) The Lasswell value dictionary. New Haven, CT: New Haven.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., & Swales, J.
(2006) A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 56–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H.
(2018) The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, amy012. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., Hitchcock, C., & Casal, J. E.
(2018b) Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
(1997) Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp.1–23). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A., & Boulton, A.
(Eds.) (2015) Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leong, P. A.
(2014) The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Lingard, L.
(2015) Enlisting the power of the verb. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(2), 53–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lingard, L., Garwood, K., Schryer, C. F., & Spafford, M. M.
(2003) A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science & Medicine, 56(3), 603–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Calvo, R. A., & Rus, V.
(2012) G-Asks: An intelligent automatic question generation system for academic writing support. Dialogue & Discourse, 3(2), 101–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J.
(2017) Towards a specific writing assessment at Hong Kong universities. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice (pp.196–215). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.) Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X.
(2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Q.
(2016) The effects of data-driven learning activities on EFL learners’ writing development. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(Ed.) (2011) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R.
(2003) The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J.
(1984) Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavioral change. Preventive Medicine, 13(3), 299–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D.
(2015) Learner corpora and natural language processing. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.537–566). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millar, N.
(2011) The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32, 129–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mischler, E. G.
(1984) The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Waye Perry, B.
(2007) Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729–768. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molés-Cases, T., & Oster, U.
(2015) Webquests in translator training. In A. Lénko-Szymánska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp.201–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moretti, F.
(2013) Distant reading. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Morrison, B.
(2014) Challenges faced by non-native undergraduate student writers in an English-medium university. The Asian ESP Journal, 10(1), 136–174.Google Scholar
Morrison, B., & Evans, S.
(2018) Supporting non-native speaker student writers making the transition from school to an English-medium university. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Z., & Nakahara, S.
(2001) English language education in Japanese dental schools. European Journal of Dental Education, 5(4), 168–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, A.
(2013) Cross-linguistic influence on the accuracy order of L2 English grammatical morphemes. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead. (pp.325–334). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Murakami, A., Thompson, P., Hunston, S., & Vajn, D.
(2017) ‘What is this corpus about?’: Using topic modelling to explore a specialised corpus. Corpora, 12(2), 243–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadershahi, N., Bender, D. J., Lyon, C., & Blaseio, A.
(2013) An overview of case-based and problem-based learning methodologies for dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 77(10) 1300–1305.Google Scholar
Nesi, H.
(2009) A multidimensional analysis of student writing across levels and disciplines. In M. Edwardes (Ed.), Proceedings of the BAAL annual conference 2008: 41st annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, 11–13 September 2008: Taking the measure of applied linguistics, Swansea University (pp.11–13). London: Scitsiugnil PressGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
(2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E.
(2008) Writing to learn: How alternative theories of school writing account for student performance. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.235–247). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nini, A.
(2015a) Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (Version 1.3) [Computer Doftware]. Retrieved from https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/multidimensionaltagger​/home
O’Donnell, M.
(2008) The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA, Almeria, Spain, 3–5 April (pp.3–5).Google Scholar
Ott, N., & Meurers, D.
(2010) Information retrieval for education: Making search engines language aware. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 3(1–2), 109–143.Google Scholar
Pak, A., & Paroubek, P.
(2010, May) Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREC (Vol. 10, No. 2010).Google Scholar
Pang, B., & Lee, L.
(2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J., Demecheleer, M., & Mackay, J.
(2017) Writing like a builder: Acquiring a professional genre in a pedagogical setting. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 29–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pendar, N., & Chappelle, C.
(2008) Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological issues. Calico Journal, 25(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez-Tornel, M., Alcaraz Calero, J. M., & Jiménez, P. A.
(2011) Tracking learners' actual uses of corpora: Guided vs non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C. & Park, J. H.
(2016) Language development in second language writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.287–306). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poon, A.
(2010) Language use, and language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11, 1–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, C.
(2014) Training L2 writers to reference corpora as a self-correction tool. ELT Journal, 69(2), 165–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2016) Log-likelihood calculator [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/llwizard​.htmlGoogle Scholar
(2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment [Computer Software]. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S., & McEnery, A. M.
(2004) The UCREL semantic analysis system [Computer Software]. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Rayson, P., & Garside, R.
(1998) The CLAWS web tagger. ICAME Journal, 22, 121–123.Google Scholar
Richards, P. S., & Inglehart, M. R.
(2006) An interdisciplinary approach to case-based teaching: Does it create patient-centered and culturally sensitive providers? Journal of Dental Education, 70(3), 284–291.Google Scholar
Riley, K.
(1991) Passive voice and rhetorical role in scientific writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21(3), 239–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
(2011) Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 205–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., & Swales, J. M.
(2010) The Michigan corpus of upper-level student papers (MICUSP) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://​micusp​.elicorpora​.info/ Crossref
Salager-Meyer, F.
(1991) Hedging in medical discourse: 1980-1990. Interface, 6(1), 33–54.Google Scholar
(1994) Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., Spafford, M., & Garwood, K.
(2003) Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp.62–96). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.Google Scholar
Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., & Spafford, M.
(2007) Regularised practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In M. Zachry & C. Thralls (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp.21–44). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schubert, C.
(2016) Current trends in register research. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp.1–18). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simsek, D., Shum, S. B., De Liddo, A., Ferguson, R., & Sándor, Á.
(2014, March) Visual analytics of academic writing. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp.265–266). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) A way with common words. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp.157–159). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Small, H.
(2011) Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics, 87(2), 373–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M.
(1968) The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 8(1), 113–116.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers: From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication, 31, 118–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J., & Burke, A.
(2003) It’s really fascinating work: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In P. Leistyna, & C. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus analysis. Language structure and language use (pp.1–18). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Swales, J., & Feak, C.
(2000) English in today’s research world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The BNC Sampler
(1999) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Computing Services
Thomas, J.
(2015) Stealing a march on collocation: Deriving extended collocations from full-text for student analysis and synthesis. In In A. Lénko-Szymánska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp.85–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tono, Y., Satake, Y., & Miura, A.
(2014) The effects of using corpora on revision tasks in L2 writing with coded error feedback. ReCALL, 26, 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y.
(2003, May) Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (Vol. 1, pp.173–180). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tribble, C.
(2001) Small corpora and teaching writing. In M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, & R. L. Roseberry (Eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and practice (pp.381–408). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tribble, C., & Wingate, U.
(2013) From text to corpus: A genre-based approach to academic literacy instruction. System, 41, 307–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(2000) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th edn). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Whiteside, K., & Wharton, S.
(2019) Semantic patterning of grammatical keywords in undergraduate academic writing from two close disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 1-20.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(1998) Context, community, and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmann, J., Koh, K., & Ziai, R.
(2011) The SACODEYL search tool: Exploiting corpora for language learning purposes. In A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew, & G. Aston (Eds.), New trends in corpora and language learning (pp.167–178). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Williams, G.
(2012) Bringing data and dictionary together: Real science in real dictionaries. In A. Boulton, Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications (pp.217–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I. A.
(1996) A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and experimental. English for Specific Purposes, 15, 175–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.
(2013) Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. In M. Bieswanger & A. Koll-Stobbe (Eds.), New approaches to the study of linguistic variability (pp.3–11). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Winker, M. A.
(2006) Clinical Crossroads: Expanding the horizons. JAMA, 295(24), 2888–2888. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H., & Badger, R. G.
(2009) In a strange and uncharted land: ESP teachers’ strategies for dealing with unpredicted problems in subject knowledge during class. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 19–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. C., Chang, Y. C., Mitamura, T., & Chang, J. S.
(2010, July) Automatic collocation suggestion in academic writing. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers (pp.115–119). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yan, E., Williams, J., Chen, Z.
(2017) Understanding disciplinary vocabularies using a full-text enabled domain-independent term extraction approach. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0187762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H.
(2008) More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 31–49 19-32.Google Scholar
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A.
(2004) ESL student attitude toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 257–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S., & Karr, A.
(2011) Deming, data and observational studies. Significance, 8, 116–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., & Zhang, F.
(2015) Disciplinary difference in citation opinion expressions. iConference 2015 Proceedings.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Noguera-Díaz, Yolanda & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
2020. Teaching acronyms to the military: A paper-based DDL approach. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Linguistics

Applied linguistics
Germanic linguistics
Corpus linguistics
Language teaching
English linguistics
Language acquisition
BIC Subject: CFX – Computational linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN020000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Study & Teaching
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019027975 | Marc record