Chapter published in:
Lexical Priming: Applications and advances
Edited by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 79] 2017
► pp. 254272
References

References

Culpeper, J.
2009Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(1): 29–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P.
2009Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes 28: 157–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2008The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Færch, C. & Kasper, G.
1984Two ways of defining communication strategies. Language Learning 34(1): 45–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
2006Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 209–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger S.
1996From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast: Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies, K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (eds), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
1998Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, A. Cowie (ed.), 145–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A.
1994Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
2004The textual priming of lexis. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (eds), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ISK = Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T.R., & Alho, I.
(eds) 2004Iso suomen kielioppi (A comprehensive Finnish grammar). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Ivaska, I.
2015Longitudinal changes in academic learner Finnish: A key structure analysis. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(2), 210–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, J.H.
2001’Tärkeä seikka’ ja ’keskeinen kysymys’: Mitä korpuslingvistinen analyysi paljastaa lähisynonyymeista? (What can corpus analysis reveal about near synonyms?). Virittäjä 105(2): 170–192.Google Scholar
2004Synonymia ja käännössuomi (Synonymity and translated Finnish). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
2007Oppijansuomen piirteitä korpusvetoisesti (A corpus-driven study on learner Finnish). In Virsu 3: Suomalais-ugrilaisia kohdekieliä ja kontakteja, P. Muikku-Werner, O. Kokko, & H. Remes (eds), 69–83. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
2015Oppimiskontekstin vaikutus oppijanpragmatiikkaan: astemääritteet leksikaalisina nallekarhuina (Learning context and its effect on learner pragmatics: Degree modifiers as lexical teddy bears). Lähivõrdlusi–Lähivertailuja 25: 105–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, J.H. & Brunni, S.
2013Morphology, lexical priming and second language acquisition: A corpus-study on learner Finnish. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead, S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (eds), 235–245. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Kaivapalu, A.
2005Lähdekieli kielenoppimisen apuna (Contribution L1 to foreign language acquisition). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Kallioranta, O.
2009Paljon-adverbin kollokointi oppijansuomessa: Korpusvetoinen tutkimus (The collocations of paljon adverb in learner Finnish: A corpus-driven study). MA thesis, University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F.
1985Paradigms and word forms. Studia Gramatyczne VII: 135–154.Google Scholar
1986Frequency considerations in morphology. Zeitschrift fur Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39: 19–28.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.
2008Phraseology and language pedagogy: Semantic preference associated with English verbs in the British National Corpus. In Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, F. Meunier & S. Granger (eds), 22–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Eliasson, S.
1993What causes avoidance in second language learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity, or L2 complexity? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1): 35–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
2006Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 363–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M.
1995The Map and the Rope. Finnish Nominal Inflection as a Learning Target. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A.
2000Strange strings in translated language: A study on corpora. In Intercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies I, M. Olohan (ed.), 119–141. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2005Collocations in a Learner Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H.
1983Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (eds), 191–226. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Rayson, P.
2008From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. & Tribble, C.
2006Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siitonen, K.
1999Agenttia etsimässä. U-verbijohdokset edistyneen suomenoppijan ongelmana (In Search of an Agent. U-verb Derivations and Advanced Students of Finnish). Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Siitonen, K. & Mizuno, M.
2010Suomen monitahoinen possessiivisuffiksi ja suomenoppija. (Many-sided possessive suffix of Finnish and a Finnish learner). Lähivõrdlusi–Lähivertailuja 19: 136–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
2009Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spoelman, M.
2013Prior Linguistic Knowledge Matters: The Use of the Partitive Case in Finnish Learner Language. Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
1995Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language 2(1): 23–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I. Eisenbeiss, S. & Clahsen, H.
1999Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition 72(3): 203–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E.
1996Corpus Theory and Practice. Birmingham: TWC Monographs.Google Scholar
Winkler, S.
2009The acquisition of syntactic finiteness in L1 German: A structure-building approach. In Functional Categories in Learner Language, C. Dimroth & P. Jordens (eds), 97–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
2000Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 463–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.
2009Semantic prosody and ESL/EFL vocabulary pedagogy. TESL Canada Journal 26(2): 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar