Chapter published in:
Lexical Priming: Applications and advances
Edited by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 79] 2017
► pp. 122140
References

References

Adelman, J. S.. et al.
2006Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision time. Psychological Science 17: 814–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62: 67–82. Crossref
Barnbrook, G., Mason, O., & Krishnamurthy, J.
2013Collocation: Applications and Implications. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bawcom, L.
2010What’s in a Name? The Functions of Similonyms and Their Lexical Priming for Frequency. PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
Bod, R.
2000The storage and computation of three word sentences. Paper presented at architectures and mechanisms of language processing conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.
2001Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. Paper presented at CUNY 2001, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P., et al.
1995Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistics 24(6): 489–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clear, J.H.
1993From Firth principles – Computational tools for the study of collocation. Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 271–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F.
1975A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82: 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N.
2008Formulaic sequences: are they processed more quickly than non-formulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32 45–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K.
1992A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics 13: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimich, M. & Goodside L.
. (Dir) 2008The Ellen Degeneres Show. New York NY: National Broadcasting Company.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Philip
1999Semantic representations of near-synonyms. Unpublished thesis, University of Toronto.
Faigley, L.
(ed.) 2005The Penguin Handbook. New York NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R.
[1951]1957A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952–59, F. Palmer (ed.), 168–205. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, H., Aaron, J. & Okoomian, J.
(eds) 2007The Little Brown Handbook. New York NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keeble, R.
1998The Newspapers’ Handbook, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kess, J.F.
1992Psycholinguistics: Psychology, Linguistics, and the Study of Natural Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 86]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. & Charles, W.G.
1991Contextual correlates of of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6:1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, W.S. & Forster, K.I.
2004Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The Rank Hypothesis. Psychological Review 111(3): 721–756. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
1998Patterns and Meanings [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M.H.
2007Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
[1997]2004 Trust the Text: Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
1996Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Corpus analysis: The state of the art and three types of unanswered questions. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 15–36. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B.L., Libben, G. & Westbury, C.
2011Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61: 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Software

Bloomfield. L.
2004Wcopyfind 2.6. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia. 〈www​.plagiarism​.phys​.Virginia​.edu〉 (18 June 2006).Google Scholar
Davies, M.
2008Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 〈www​.americancorpus​.org/Google Scholar
Scott, M.
2006Wordsmith Tools, Version 4. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
The British National Corpus, Version 2 (BNC World)
2001 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.