Article published in:
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 267296
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ben Amor, Olfa & Faiza Derbel
2020.  In Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ 2019 and Its Natural Language Processing Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1153],  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Acar, A., Geluso, J. & Shiki, T.
2011How can search engines improve your writing? CALL-EJ 12(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Adolphs, S.
2006Introducing Electronic Text Analysis: A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allan, R.
2009Can a graded reader corpus provide ‘authentic’ input? ELT Journal 63(1): 23–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L.
2011AntConc, version 3. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp (17 February 2013).Google Scholar
Aston, G.
1997Small and large corpora in language learning. In Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & J. Melia (eds), 51–62. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. & Bernardini, S.
(eds) 2006Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Bergh, G.
2005Min(d)ing English language data on the web: What can Google tell us? ICAME Journal 29: 25–46.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S., Baroni, M. & Evert, S.
2006A WaCky introduction. In Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 9–40. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A.
2010aData-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning 60(3): 534–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bData-driven learning: On paper, in practice. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 17–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011aData-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In Explorations across Languages and Corpora, S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (ed.), 563–580. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011bBringing corpora to the masses: Free and easy tools for interdisciplinary language studies. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 69–96. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012Hands-on/hands-off: Alternative approaches to data-driven learning. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 152–168. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. & Tyne, H.
2014Des Documents Authentiques aux Corpus: Démarches pour l’Apprentissage des Langues. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Braun, S.
2005From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL 17(1): 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Getting past ‘groundhog day’: Spoken multimedia corpora for student-centred corpus exploration. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 75–97. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brezina, V.
2012Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(4): 319–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, L.
2002Where did we go wrong? A retrospective look at the British National Corpus. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 51–70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Buyse, K. & Verlinde, S.
2013Possible effects of free on line data driven lexicographic instruments on foreign language learning: The case of Linguee and the Interactive Language Toolbox. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95: 507–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A. & O’Sullivan, Í.
2004Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL 16(1): 158–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J.-Y.
2010Postsecondary EFL students’ evaluations of corpora with regard to English writing. SNU Journal of Education Research 19: 57–85. http://​s​-space​.snu​.ac​.kr​/bitstream​/10371​/72997​/1​/vol19​_3​.pdf (11 April 2011).Google Scholar
Cheng, W.
2011Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chinnery, G.
2008You’ve got some GALL: Google-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology 12(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Cobb, T.
2014A resource wish-list for data-driven learning in French. In Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies, H. Tyne, V. André, A. Boulton, C. Benzitoun & Y. Greub (eds), 257–292. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Conroy, M.
2010Internet tools for language learning: University students taking control of their writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(6): 861–882.Google Scholar
Cotos, E.
2014Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL 26(2): 202–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
2011Internet Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
2009The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 159–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Google Scholar and COCA-Academic: Two very different approaches to examining academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 155–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dose, S.
2012Scripted speech in the EFL classroom: The Corpus of American Television Series for teaching spoken English. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 103–121. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Dudeney, G.
2000The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. & Roberts, B.
2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J.
1957Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W.
2007Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 25–45. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Forchini, P.
2012Movie Language Revisited: Evidence from Multi- Dimensional Analysis and Corpora. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A.
2014How language learners can benefit from corpora, or not. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 11(1): 93-110.Google Scholar
Franz, A. & Brants, T.
2006All our n-gram are belong to you. Google Machine Translation Team Research Blog. http://​googleresearch​.blogspot​.fr​/2006​/08​/all​-our​-n​-gram​-are​-belong​-to​-you​.html (6 June 2012).Google Scholar
Gao, Z.-M.
2011Exploring the effects and use of a Chinese-English parallel concordancer. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 255–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavioli, L.
2009Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 39–71. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Geiller, L.
2014How EFL students can use Google to correct ‘untreatable’ written errors. Eurocall Review 22(2): 26-45.Google Scholar
Geluso, J.
2013Phraseology and frequency of occurrence on the web: Native speakers’ perceptions of Google-informed second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(2): 144–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. & Roseberry, R.
(eds) 2001Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S.
2010How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 359–370. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S.
2009Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, C. & Candlin, C.
2007Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E. & Thomas, K.
2010Trust on the web: How young adults judge the credibility of online content. International Journal of Communication 4: 468–494.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D.
1996Hunting, grazing, browsing: A model for online information retrieval. ONLINE 20: n.p. http://​www​.onlinemag​.net​/JanOL​/hawkins​.html (17 July, 2006 via http://​web​.archive​.org).Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
2012Lexical priming: The odd case of a psycholinguistic theory that generates corpus-linguistic hypotheses for both English and Chinese. Paper given at Corpus Technologies and Applied Linguistics . Suzhou: Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, 28-30 June. Crossref
Huang, H.-T. & Liou, H.-C.
2007Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology 11(3): 64–82.Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N. & Biewer, C.
(eds) 2007Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Johns, T.
1986Micro-Concord: A language learner’s research tool. System 14(2): 151–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Whence and whither classroom concordancing? In Computer Applications in Language Learning, P. Bongaerts, P. de Haan, S. Lobbe & H. Wekker (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1990From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. CALL Austria 10: 14–34.Google Scholar
1991Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds), English Language Research Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
1993Data-driven learning: An update. TELL&CALL 2: 4–10.Google Scholar
1997Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 100–115. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Johns, T. & King, P.
(eds) 1991Classroom Concordancing. English Language Research Journal 4.Google Scholar
Johns, T., Lee, H.-C. & Wang, L.
2008Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(5): 483–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B.
2004The editor’s department: On change in Language and change in language. Language 80(3): 381–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaszubski, P.
2006Web-based concordancing and ESAP writing. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 41: 161–193.Google Scholar
Keller, F. & Lapata, M.
2003Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics 29(3): 459–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Miceli, T.
2001An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 77–90.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A.
2001Web as corpus. In Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline, G. Sampson & D. McCarthy (eds), 471–473. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005Language is never, ever, ever random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 263–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33(1): 147–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G.
(eds) 2003 Web as Corpus . Computational Linguistics 29(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, N.
2011Working with corpora for translation teaching in a French-speaking setting. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (eds), 62–80. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lam, Y.
2000Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review 56(3): 390–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J.
2001Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
1997Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 1–23. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A.
2014Is this enough? A qualitative evaluation of the effectiveness of a teacher-training course on the use of corpora in language education. ReCALL 26(2): 260–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Oakey, D.
2004Communication with a purpose: Exploiting the Internet to promote language learning. In ICT and Language Learning: Integrating Pedagogy and Practice, A. Chambers, J. Conacher & J. Littlemore (eds), 95–119. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Evert, S. & Baroni, M.
2007Using web data for linguistic purposes. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 7–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
2008Accessing and interpreting corpus information in the teacher education context. Language Teaching 41(4): 563–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y.
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milton, J.
2006Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds), 123–137. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, B.
2007Recalcitrant problems of comparative alternation and new insights emerging from Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 211–232. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H.
2000The Use and Abuse of EFL Dictionaries. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Í. & Chambers, A.
2006Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(1): 49–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, K.
2012Learner-corpus interaction: A locus of microgenesis in corpus-assisted L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 33(4): 361–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, K. & Kinginger, C.
2010Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning & Technology 14(3): 31–50.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez Tornel, M., Alcaraz Calero, J. & Aguada Jiménez, P.
2011Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: Guided vs. non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G.
2011‘…and I dropped my jaw with fear’: The role of corpora in teaching phraseology. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 49–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P.
2009Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A., Kehoe, A. & Banerjee, J.
2007WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robb, T.
2003Google as a quick ‘n’ dirty corpus tool. TESL-EJ 7(2): n.p. http://​www​.tesl​-ej​.org​/wordpress​/issues​/volume7​/ej26​/ej26int (1 July, 2007).Google Scholar
Rodgers, O., Chambers, A. & LeBaron, F.
2011Corpora in the LSP classroom: A learner-centred corpus of French for biotechnologists. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(3): 392–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, G.
2007Determinants of grammatical variation in English and the formation/confirmation of linguistic hypotheses by means of Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 191–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2010Using general and specialised corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Corpus-based Approaches to English Language Teaching, M.-C. Campoy, B. Bellés-Fortuño & M.-L. Gea-Valor (eds), 18–35. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A.
2007Exploring constructions on the web: A case study. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 67–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M.
2000The biggest corpus of all. Humanising Language Teaching 2(3): n.p. http://​www​.hltmag​.co​.uk​/may00​/idea​.htm (7 June 2012).Google Scholar
Scheffler, P.
2007When intuition fails us: The world wide web as a corpus. Glottodidactica 33: 137–145.Google Scholar
Sha, G.
2010Using Google as a super corpus to drive written language learning: A comparison with the British National Corpus. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(5): 377–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S.
2006Creating general-purpose corpora using automated search engine queries. In WaCKy! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 63–98. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Shei, C.
2008aWeb as corpus, Google, and TESOL: A new trilogy. Taiwan Journal of TESOL 5(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
2008bDiscovering the hidden treasure on the Internet: Using Google to uncover the veil of phraseology. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(1): 67–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2001Preface. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. Roseberry (eds), vii–xv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Reading Concordances: An Introduction. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2004How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Corpus and text: Basic principles. / Appendix: How to build a corpus. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, M. Wynne (ed.), 5–24 / 95–101. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Smith, S.
2011Learner construction of corpora for general English in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(4): 291–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G. & Toffoli, D.
2012Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL 24(2): 138–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D., Bernardini, S. & Aston, G.
2004Ten years of TaLC. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.-C.
2007Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(4): 323–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Todd, R.
2001Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System 29(1): 91–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyne, H.
2012Corpus work with ordinary teachers: Data-driven learning activities. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 136–151. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Volk, M.
2002Using the web as corpus for linguistic research. In Tähendusepüüdja: Catcher of the Meaning – A Festschrift for Professor Halduur Oim, R. Pajusalu & T. Hennoste (eds), n.p. Tartu: University of Tartu. http://​www​.ifi​.unizh​.ch​/CL​/volk​/papers​/Oim​_Festschrift​_2002​.pdf (25 March 2006).Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G.
2000On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J.
1998Concordances in the classroom without a computer. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, B. Tomlinson (ed.), 44–66. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wu, S., Franken, M. & Witten, I.
2009Refining the use of the web (and web search) as a language teaching and learning resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(3): 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. & Jo, J.
2014Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1): 96–117.Google Scholar
Young, B.
2011The grammar voyeur: Using Google to teach English grammar to advanced undergraduates. American Speech 86(2): 247–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar