Article published in:
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 63–84

Learning phraseology from speech corpora

| School of Languages and Literatures, Translation and Interpreting University of Bologna
There is substantial evidence that phraseology is key to fluency in speech production and reception, particularly in cognitively/affectively demanding contexts like interpreting. Yet most second language speakers have limited repertoires of phraseological items, lacking knowledge of their lexicogrammatical, functional, and also of their prosodic aspects. Speech corpora which align transcripts with audio can readily be constructed from subtitled video materials, and learners can use these to view and hear concordanced data. Examples are provided for phraseological items documented in a one million-word corpus of talks from the TED – Ideas worth spreading site (www.ted.com), analysed using WordSmith Tools (Scott 2012). Activities for performance with and by learners are also suggested, aimed at increasing their phraseological awareness and expanding their repertoires.
Keywords: interpreting, phraseology, speech corpora, subtitles, TED talks
Published online: 13 May 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.04ast
References

References

Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
2010 More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M.
2006 Prosody and idioms in English. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1580–1597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aston, G.
2001 Corpora in language pedagogy: An overview. In Learning with Corpora, G. Aston (ed.), 7–45. Houston TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Bardovi–Harlig, K. & Vellenga, H.
2012 The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System 40(1): 77–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
2006 University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
1999 Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora, S. Oksefjell & H. Hasselgard (eds), 181–189. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V.
2004 ‘If you look at…’: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1976 Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
2002 Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 215–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1988 Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication 5(4): 395–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J.
2012 Mining a year of speech. Presentation at TGE Adonis, Orleans, 5 April. http://​f​.hypotheses​.org​/wp​-content​/blogs​.dir​/612​/files​/2012​/05​/presentation​_john​_coleman​.pdf (8 May 2014).
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N.
2008 Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. & Walls, R.
2012 TED talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. TESOLANZ Journal 20(1): 55–67.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. & Salsbury, T.
2011 The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.
2012 Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 17–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erman, B.
2007 Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(1): 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, P.
2001 Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (eds), 75–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L. & Aston, G.
2001 Enriching reality: Language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal 55(3): 238–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gile, D.
1997 Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, J. Danks, G. Shreve, S. Fountain & M. McBeath (eds), 196–214. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Glavitsch, U., Simon, K. & Szakos, J.
2011 SpeechIndexer: A flexible software for audio–visual language learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Informatics, and Cybernetics; International Symposium on Integrating Research, Education, and Problem-Solving (post-conference edition), N. Callaos, H.-W. Chu, J. Horne & F. Welsch (eds), 91–94. http://​www​.iiis​.org​/p​-proceedings​/november2011​/ICEIC​-IREPS​-I​/ICEIC​-IREPS​-Book​-Vol​-I​-PostConferencia​.pdf (8 May, 2014).
Gray, B. & Biber, D.
2013 Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, C.
2009 ConcGram 1.0. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A.
1994 Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, L.
2007 The song in the booth: Formulaic interpreting and oral textualisation. Interpreting 9(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K.
1996 Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004 Formulaic performance in conventionalised varieties of speech. In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [Language Learning and Language Teaching 9], N. Schmitt (ed.), 37–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K., Columbus, G. & Schmitt, N.
2009 Acquiring phrasal vocabulary. In Advances in Language Acquisition, S. Foster-Cohen (ed.), 216–240. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lin, P.
2010a The phonology of formulaic sequences: A review. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, D. Wood (ed.), 174–193. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010b The Prosody of Formulaic Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.
2012 Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics 33(3): 342–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The prosody of formulaic expressions in the IBM/Lancaster Spoken English Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 561–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P.
2011 WinPitch: A multimodal tool for speech analysis of endangered languages. In Interspeech-2011, 3273–3276.Google Scholar
Mel’cuk, I.
1998 Collocations and lexical functions. In Phraseology, A. Cowie (ed.), 23–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Millar, N.
2011 The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics 32(2): 129–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P.
2001 Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J.
1980 A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 14(3): 337–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. & De Carrico, J.
1992 Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nesi, H. & Basturkmen, H.
2006 Lexical bundles and discourse signaling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 283–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.B., Römer, U. & Ellis, N.
2013 The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 83–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W.
1982 Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parry, M.
1971 The Making of Homeric Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.
1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J. Richards & R. Schmidt (eds), 191–225. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2000 The one clause at a time hypothesis. In Perspectives on Fluency, H. Riggenbach (ed.), 163–191. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pigada, M. & Schmitt, N.
2006 Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Raupach, M.
1984 Formulae in second language speech production. In Second Language Production, H. Dechert, D. Möhle & M. Raupach (eds), 114–137. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
2011 Observations on the phraseology of academic writing: Local patterns – local meanings? In The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair, T. Herbst, S. Faulhaber & P. Uhrig (eds), 211–227. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
2012 WordSmith Tools 6.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N.
2010 An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
1987 Collocation: A progress report. In Language Topics, II: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, R. Steele & T. Threadgold (eds), 319–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Interview with John Sinclair, conducted by Wolfgang Teubert. In English Collocation Studies: The OSTI report, R. Krishnamurthy, R. Daley, S. Jones & J. Sinclair (eds), xvii–xxix. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 The phrase, the whole phrase and nothing but the phrase. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger & F. Meunier (eds), 407–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
1998 A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Strik, H., Hulsbosch, M. & Cucchiarini, C.
2010 Analyzing and identifying multiword expressions in spoken language. Language Resources and Evaluation 44(1-2): 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P.
2011 Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal 65(1): 71–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel Sosa, A. & MacFarlane, J.
2002 Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: Collocations involving the word ‘of’. Brain and Language 83(2): 227–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J., Griffith, D., Yates, R., Visconte, S., Simoneaux, B. & Harris, L.
2012 Lie detection by inducing cognitive load: Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of ‘witnesses’ to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39(7): 887–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.
2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zahar, R., Cobb, T. & Spada, N.
2001 Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review 57(4): 541–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bui, Thuy, Frank Boers & Averil Coxhead
2020. Extracting multiword expressions from texts with the aid of online resources. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:2 ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.