Article published in:
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 79–98

Telling by omission

Hedging and negative evaluation in academic recommendation letters

This corpus-based study explores some of the linguistic and discursive aspects of framing positive and negative information – mainly modals, evaluative adjectives, and mitigation strategies – in recommendation letters. The corpus is comprised of 114 letters of recommendation spanning three years of applications to an English Ph.D. program, approximately 46,000 words. The results reveal consistent patterns in the way different types of modals and their associated collocates are used to hedge predictions, and the analysis identifies the discursive frames of the most common mitigation strategies in presenting potentially negative information about applicants. The study illustrates the need to combine both corpus-based quantitative and qualitative methods for a more robust and fine-grained analysis of evaluative language in this occluded genre. Keywords: Recommendation letters; evaluative language; modals; negative presentation; mitigation strategies; occluded genres
Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.04alb
References

References

Aamodt, Michael & Bryan, Devon
1993 Predicting performance with letters of recommendation. Public Personnel Management 22(1): 81.Google Scholar
Baxter, James, Brock, Barbara, Hill, Peter & Rozelle, Richard
1981 Letters of recommendation: A question of value. Journal of Applied Psychology 66(3): 296-301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Susan, Cole, Suzanne & Floge, Liliane
1992 Letters of recommendation in academe: Do women and men write in different languages? The American Sociologist 23(3): 7-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Doublas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biernat, Monica & Eidelman, Scott
2007 Translating subjective language in letters of recommendation: The case of the sexist professor. European Journal of Social Psychology 37(6): 1149-1175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blechman, Andrew & Gussman, Debra
2008 Letters of recommendation: an analysis for evidence of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 53(10): 793-797.Google Scholar
Bouton, Lawrence
1995 A cross-cultural analysis of the structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 211-211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson Stephen
1988 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bruland, Holly
2009 Rhetorical cues and cultural clues: An analysis of the recommendation letter in English studies. Rhetoric Review 28(4): 406-424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colarelli, Stephen, Hechanova-Alampay, Regina & Canali, Kristophor
2002 Letters of recommendation: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Human Relations 55(3): 315-344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feak, Christine
2009 Negotiating publication: Author’s responses to peer review of medical research articles in thoracic surgery. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 59: 17-34. <http://​publica​.webs​.ull​.es​/upload​/REV%20RECEI​/59%20%202009​/02%20Feak​.pdf>Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 Hedging in Scientific Research Articles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2007 Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2): 249-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2010 Lying by telling the truth? Language Log 5 January 2010 <http://​languagelog​.ldc​.upenn​.edu​/nll​/?p​=2023>Google Scholar
2012 The quality of quantity. Language Log 25 April 2012 <http://​languagelog​.ldc​.upenn​.edu​/nll​/?p​=3922>Google Scholar
Lopez, Shane, Oehlert, Mary & Moberly, Rebecca
1996 Selection criteria for American Psychological Association-accredited internship programs: A survey of training directors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 27(5): 518-520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James & White, Peter
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, Rodney & Rybroek, Gregory
1988 Internship letters of recommendation: Where are the other 90%? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 19(1): 115-117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Precht, Kristen
1998 A cross-cultural comparison of letters of recommendation. English for Specific Purposes 17(3): 241-265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Michael & Martinson, David
2000 Perceived effects of exaggeration in recommendation letters. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 55(1): 40-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, Toni, Whitehead, Jessica & Wysocki, Vicky
2007 A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles 57(7-8): 509-514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1996 Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 41], Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen (eds), 45-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004  Research Genres: Explorations and Applications . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trix, Francis & Psenka, Carolyn
2003 Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society 14(2): 191-220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Joanne & Orlikowski, Wanda
1992 Genres of organizational communication: A structural approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review 17(2): 299-326.Google Scholar