Article published in:
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 239262


Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. & Finegan E.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carnie, A.
2002Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chung, Y-S.
2001 Tough Construction in English: A Construction Grammar Approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Collins Cobuild English Dictionary
1995 London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Curme, G.O.
1931Syntax. Boston MA: D.C. Heath and company.Google Scholar
De Smet, H.
2005A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.Google Scholar
Dowty, D.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. & Kay P.
1995Construction Grammar. Ms.Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston S. & Manning E.
(eds) 1998Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns, 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
2001Syntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUPGoogle Scholar
Hietaranta, P.S.
1983In Defence of the Possibility of Sentential Tough Complements. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
1984Some functional aspects of the tough construction. Studia Neophilologica 56: 21–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G.
1987Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1975 Tough and the Trace Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 437–447.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, C.
1987 Tough-movement in Present-Day British English: A corpus-based study. Studia Linguistica 41: 59–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nanni, D.L.
1980On the surface syntax of constructions with easy-type adjectives. Language 56: 568–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
<www​.OED​.com> (fall 2012).
Postal, P.M.
1971Cross-Over Phenomena. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1974On Raising. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H.
1914A Grammar of Late Modern English: Part II – the parts of speech section I, A – nouns, adjectives and articles. Groningen: Noordhoof.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum S., Leech G. & Svartvik J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G.
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.S.
1967The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H.
1898A New English Grammar, Part II: Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Visser, F.T.
1966An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 2: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M.
1999Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations [Studies in Language Companion Series 78]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar