Article published in:
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 233–270

Illocution, attitudes and prosody

A multimodal analysis

| Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
| CNRS
Through the analysis of an audio-visual corpus of Brazilian Portuguese prosodic attitudes, this paper describes the effect of attitude category on the prosodic realization of sentences. Attitudes that directly address the propositional content of utterances, which in fact correspond to new illocutions, were found to induce more changes in the acoustic signal than do those used to manage the social relationship between speaker and addressee. This difference is also reflected in perception, with the social attitudes mostly perceived through visual cues, while the propositional ones tend to be based on audio cues.
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.09mor
References
Aubergé, Véronique
2002 A gestalt morphology of prosody directed by functions: The example of a step-by-step model developed at ICP. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 , Aix-en-Provence , 151–155.
Austin, John L.
1962 How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert M.
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bänziger, Tanja & Scherer, Klaus R.
2005 The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication 46(3–4): 252–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barkhuysen, Pashiera, Krahmer, Emil & Swerts, Marc
2010 Crossmodal and incremental perception of audiovisual cues to emotional speech. Language & Speech 53(1): 3–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2012 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer,Version 5.3.19. http://​www​.praat​.org/Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1986 Intonation and its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brandt, Per Aage
1971 Mode, textualité. Note sur la modalité romane. Revue Romane 6(2): 145–168.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nick
1993 Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in speech. Speech Communication 13: 343–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Aojou
2003 Reaction time as an indicator to discrete intonational contrasts in English. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2003 , Geneva , 97–100.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth
1986 An Introduction to English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
1998 Critère illocutoire et articulation informative. LABLITA, preprint 2.Google Scholar
2000 Per una nuova classificazzione dell’illocuzione. LABLITA, preprint 1.Google Scholar
Daneš, Frantisek
1994 Involvement with language and in language. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4): 251–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. & Hager, Joseph C.
2002 Facial Action Coding System. The Manual on CD ROM. Research Nexus division of Network Information Research Corporation. Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina
2003 Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’italiano parlato. PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan, Bérard, Eva & Fónagy, Judith
1984 Clichés mélodiques. Folia Linguistica 17:153–185.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan
1993 As Funções modais da entoação. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos (25): 25–65.Google Scholar
2000 Languages Within Language: An Evolutive Approach [Foundations of Semiotics 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Wentao, Zhang, Ting & Fujisaki, Hiroya
2011 Prosodic analysis and perception of Mandarin utterances conveying attitudes. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 , Firenze , 1069–1072,
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004 The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, Peter & van Berkum, Jos
2007 Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences 362: 801–811. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnish, Robert M.
1994 Mood, meaning and speech acts. In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 407–459. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007: Mood: What’s the illocutionary point? In Current Trends in Pragmatics, Piotr Cap & Joanna Nijakowska (eds), 182–204. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel J.
2005 Form and function in the representation of speech prosody. Speech Communication 46(3–4): 334–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Hideki
2008 TANDEM-STRAIGHT, a research tool for L2 study enabling flexible manipulations of prosodic information. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008 , Campinas, 619–628.
Léon, Pierre R.
1993 Précis de Phonostylistique: Parole et expressivité. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McGill, Robert, Tukey, John W. & Larsen, Wayne A.
1978 Variations of box plots. The American Statistician 32: 12–16.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana & Raso, Tommaso
2012 Illocution, modality, attitude: Different names for different categories. In Pragmatics and Prosody: Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello, Allessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds), 1–18. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo
2011 Spoken corpora and pragmatics. RBLA 11(2): 479–519.Google Scholar
Moraes, João A.
2008 The pitch accents in Brazilian Portuguese: Analysis by synthesis. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008 , Campinas , 389–397.
Moraes, João A., Rilliard, Albert, Mota, Bruno & Shochi, Takaaki
2010 Multimodal perception and production of attitudinal meaning in Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010 , Chicago, IL , paper 340.
Moraes, J.A., Rilliard, A., Erickson, D. & Shochi, T.
2011 Perception of atitudinal meaning in interrogative sentences of Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of ICPhS 2011 , Hong-Kong, 1430–1433.
Morlec, Yann, Bailly, Gérard & Aubergé, Véronique
2001 Generating prosodic attitudes in French: Data, model and evaluation. Speech Communication 33(4): 357–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moutinho, Lourdes de Castro, Coimbra, Rosa Lidia, Pereira Bendiha, Urbana, Romano, Antonio & Contini, Michel
2004 Estudo comparativo da variação prosódica em duas línguas românicas: O Português e o Italiano. In Actas do XIX Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 719–723. Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
Nadeu, Marianna & Prieto, Pilar
2011 Pitch range, gestural information, and perceived politeness in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 43(3): 841–854. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1994 The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Paulmann, Silke, Pell, Marc D. & Kotz, Sonja A.
2008 Functional contributions of the basal ganglia to emotional prosody: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research 1217: 171–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, Brechtje, D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Gussenhoven, Carlos
2007 Fine phonetic detail and intonational meaning. In Proceedings of ICPhS 2007 , Saarbrücken , 191–196.
Raso, Tommaso
2012 O C-ORAL-BRASIL e a Teoria da Língua em Ato. In C-ORAL – Brasil I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 91–123. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Rietveld, Tony & van Hout, Roeland
2005 Statistics in Language Research: Analysis of Variance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. & Brosch, Tobias
2009 Culture-specific appraisal biases contribute to emotion dispositions. European Journal of Personality 23(3): 265–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R. & Wallbott, Harald G.
1994 Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(2): 310–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976 A classification of illocutionnary acts. Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel
1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Shochi, T., Rilliard, A., Erickson, D., Martin, J.C. & Aubergé, V.
2008 Perception interculturelle des affects sociaux japonais et français. In 3ème Workshop sur les Agents Conversationnels Animés , Paris, 29–36.
Shochi, Takaaki, Rilliard, Albert, Aubergé, Véronique & Erickson, Donna
2009 Intercultural perception of English, French and Japanese social affective prosody. In The Role of Prosody in Affective Speech [Linguistic Insights 97], Sylvie Hancil (ed.), 31–59. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Krahmer, Emiel
2005 Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language 53(1): 81–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel
1990 Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 1: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Ann
2000 The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion. In Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion , Newcastle , 143–148.
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1988 Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, Jonathan Dancy, Julius Moravcsik & Christopher Taylor (eds), 77–101. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Reprinted in Asa Kasher (ed.) 1998 Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol. II, 262–289. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi
2012 Function vs. form in speech prosody. Lessons from experimental research and potential implications for teaching. In Pragmatics, Prosody and English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 61–76. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinck, Alexandra & Newen, Albert
2008 Classifying emotion: A developmental account. Synthese 161: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Frota, Sónia & João Antônio de Moraes
2016.  In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, ► pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Mixdorff, Hansjörg, Angelika Hönemann, Albert Rilliard, Tan Lee & Matthew K.H. Ma
2017. Audio-visual expressions of attitude: How many different attitudes can perceivers decode?. Speech Communication 95 ► pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Rilliard, Albert, Christophe d'Alessandro & Marc Evrard
2018. Paradigmatic variation of vowels in expressive speech: Acoustic description and dimensional analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143:1 ► pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

video