Article published in:Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics 17:4] 2007
► pp. 647–658
Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought
It is argued that the type of unit expansions called ‘increments’ by Schegloff 1996 is too narrowly focused on English. While the structure of English makes it particularly suited for this kind of expansion, a typologically more satisfactory approach to unit expansion runs into problems if it remains on the syntactic plane alone. A full typology will have to take into account, not only prosody and semantics, but also action structure and pragmatics at large.
Keywords: unit expansion, TCU, Increment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 December 2007
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In eaedem (eds), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp 14-38. BoP
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 52-133. BoP
(2003) Turn continuations. Towards a cross-linguistic classification. INLIST 39 (http://www.rz.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist)
Cited by other publications
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono
Oloff, Florence & Martin Havlík
O’Grady, Gerard & Tom Bartlett
Proske, Nadine & Arnulf Deppermann
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.