Article in:

Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Towards a functional literacy approach to teach the language of science in the Singapore classroom

Jonathon Adams | English Language Institute of Singapore/Ministry of Education

Fei Victor Lim | English Language and Literature Academic Group, National Institute of Education

This paper describes a pilot study exploring how an approach drawing on systemic functional linguistics can inform science teaching. This study is an exploratory effort between researchers from a linguistics background and secondary school science teachers in the Singapore science classroom. The teachers designed activities in the joint construction of texts to support students’ negotiation of meanings and clarification of conceptual understandings. With this, the teachers applied strategies to draw attention to the language of science in their lessons. The study points to the value of the functional literacy approach in science teaching and presents implications on teacher professional learning as well as the role of linguistics in developing disciplinary literacy in students.

Keywords: disciplinary literacy, genre pedagogy, functional literacy, science teaching, writing, classroom discourse, joint construction

Published online: 23 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19008.ada

References

Accurso, K., Gebhard, M., & Selden, C.

(2016) Supporting L2 elementary science writing with SFL in an age of school reform. In L. C. D. Oliveira & T. Silva (Eds.), Second Language Writing in Elementary Classrooms: Instructional Issues, Content-area Writing and Teacher Education (pp. 126–150). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R.

(2011) Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.

Bruner, J. S.

(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burns, A., & Joyce, H.

(2007) Adult ESL programs in Australia. Prospect, 22(3), 5–17.

Chin, T.-Y., & Poon, C.-L.

(2014) Design and implementation of the National Primary Science Curriculum: A partnership approach in Singapore. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 27–46). Singapore: Springer.

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B.

(2008) School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.

Creswell, J.

(2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.

Derewianka, B.

(2015) The contribution of genre theory to literacy education in Australia. In J. Turbill, G. Barton, & C. Brock (Eds.), Teaching writing in today’s classrooms: Looking back to looking forward (pp. 69–86). Norwood, Australia: Australian Literary Educators’ Association.

Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J.

(2010) The role of language in the learning and teaching of science. In J. O. J. Dillon (Ed.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 135–157). New York: Open University Press.

Fang, Z.

(2006) The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.

(2014) Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 444–448.

Fang, Z., Lamme, L., & Pringle, R.

(2010) Language and literacy in inquiry-based science classrooms, grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and Arlington.

Halliday, M. A. K.

(2006) Systemic background. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and Linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 185–198). London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.

(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third Edition ed.). London: Arnold.

Hammond, J.

(2001) Scaffolding and language. In J. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education (pp. 15–30). Newtown, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association (Australia).

Hammond, J., Burns, A., Joyce, H., Brosnan, D., & Gerot, L.

(1992) English for social purposes: A handbook for teachers of adult literacy. Sydney: NCELTR.

Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y.

(2012) The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011.

Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D.

(2016) Elementary teachers’ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597.

Lemke, J.

(1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Marissa, K. L. E.

(2015) Teaching visual texts with multimodal analysis software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 916–935.

Lim, F. V., & Tan, S. K. Y.

(2017) Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts. In O. Seizov & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations (pp. 175–200). London: Bloomsbury.

(2018) Developing multimodal literacy through teaching the critical viewing of films in Singapore. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(3), 291–300.

Luke, A., Freebody, P., Shun, L., & Gopinathan, S.

(2005) Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5–28.

Mahboob, A., & Knight, N.

(2010) Appliable linguistics. London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R.

(2001) Language, Register and Genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a Global Context (pp. 149–166). London, UK: Routledge.

Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Slater, T.

(2010) Assessing language and content: A functional perspective. In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the Untestable in Language Education (pp. 217–240). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Norris, S.

(2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. London: Routledge.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M.

(2009) Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 313–319.

Oliveira, L. C. D., & Lan, S.-W.

(2014) Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing (24), 23–39.

Polias, J.

(2016) Apprenticing students into science: doing, talking & writing scientifically. Melbourne: Melbourne Lexis Education.

Rose, D.

(2015a) Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: curriculum genres. A major discussion of R2L pedagogy focused on teacher education. In J. Martin (Ed.), Appliable Linguistics and Academic Discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

(2015b) Building a pedagogic metalanguage II: knowledge genres. A major discussion of R2L pedagogy focused on teacher education. In J. Martin (Ed.), Appliable Linguistics and Academic Discourse Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Rose, D., & Martin, J.

(2012) Learning to write, Reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy of the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.

Soong, B., & Mercer, N.

(2011) Improving students’ revision of physics concepts through ICT-based co-construction and prescriptive tutoring. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1055–1078.

Soong, B., Mercer, N., & Er, S. S.

(2010) Revision by means of computer-mediated peer discussions. Physics Education, 45(3), 264–269.

Tan, P.-H., & Tan, A.-L.

(2014) Teachers’ ideas and concerns with assessment practices in inquiry science. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore Science Classroom: Research and Practices (pp. 67–87). Singapore: Springer.

Tang, K. S., & Moje, E. B.

(2010) Relating multimodal representations to the literacies of science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 81–85.

Tang, K. S., & Putra, G. B. S.

(2016) Disciplinary literacy instructions on writing scientific explanations: a case study from a chemistry classroom in an all-girls school. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 569–579.

Tobin, K.

(2014) Transforming science education by expanding teacher and student collaboration. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 47–66). Singapore: Springer.

Unsworth, L.

(1998) “Sound” explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education, 9(2), 199–226.

(2001) Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 585–609.

Vygotsky, L.

(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Wallace, C., & Hand, B.

(2007) Using a science writing heuristic to promote learning from laboratory. In C. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 67–90). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Wallace, C., Hand, B., & Prain, V.

(2007) Breakthroughs, classroom implications, on-going, and future research. In C. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 123–135). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.

(2001) Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Wong, D., & Lau, C. Y.

(2014) The development and implementation of a guided-inquiry curriculum for secondary school physics. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 89–110). Singapore: Springer.

Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J.

(2014) Constructing a scientific explanation – A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935.

Yin, R.

(2009) Case study methods. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods for research in education. New York: Routledge.