Article published in:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 1:2 (2020) ► pp. 125–148

Towards a functional literacy approach to teach the language of science in the Singapore classroom

| English Language Institute of Singapore, Ministry of Education
| English Language and Literature Academic Group, National Institute of Education
This paper describes a pilot study exploring how an approach drawing on systemic functional linguistics can inform science teaching. This study is an exploratory effort between researchers from a linguistics background and secondary school science teachers in the Singapore science classroom. The teachers designed activities in the joint construction of texts to support students’ negotiation of meanings and clarification of conceptual understandings. With this, the teachers applied strategies to draw attention to the language of science in their lessons. The study points to the value of the functional literacy approach in science teaching and presents implications on teacher professional learning as well as the role of linguistics in developing disciplinary literacy in students.
Keywords: disciplinary literacy, functional literacy, genre pedagogy, science teaching, classroom discourse, writing, joint construction
Published online: 23 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19008.ada
References

References

Accurso, K., Gebhard, M., & Selden, C.
(2016) Supporting L2 elementary science writing with SFL in an age of school reform. In L. C. D. Oliveira & T. Silva (Eds.), Second Language Writing in Elementary Classrooms: Instructional Issues, Content-area Writing and Teacher Education (pp. 126–150). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R.
(2011) Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333, 1096–1097. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Joyce, H.
(2007) Adult ESL programs in Australia. Prospect, 22(3), 5–17.Google Scholar
Chin, T.-Y., & Poon, C.-L.
(2014) Design and implementation of the National Primary Science Curriculum: A partnership approach in Singapore. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 27–46). Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B.
(2008) School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.
(2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.Google Scholar
Derewianka, B.
(2015) The contribution of genre theory to literacy education in Australia. In J. Turbill, G. Barton, & C. Brock (Eds.), Teaching writing in today’s classrooms: Looking back to looking forward (pp. 69–86). Norwood, Australia: Australian Literary Educators’ Association.Google Scholar
Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J.
(2010) The role of language in the learning and teaching of science. In J. O. J. Dillon (Ed.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 135–157). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Z.
(2006) The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 444–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z., Lamme, L., & Pringle, R.
(2010) Language and literacy in inquiry-based science classrooms, grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and Arlington.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(2006) Systemic background. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language and Linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 185–198). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third Edition ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammond, J.
(2001) Scaffolding and language. In J. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education (pp. 15–30). Newtown, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association (Australia).Google Scholar
Hammond, J., Burns, A., Joyce, H., Brosnan, D., & Gerot, L.
(1992) English for social purposes: A handbook for teachers of adult literacy. Sydney: NCELTR.Google Scholar
Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y.
(2012) The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D.
(2016) Elementary teachers’ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Marissa, K. L. E.
(2015) Teaching visual texts with multimodal analysis software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 916–935.Google Scholar
Lim, F. V., & Tan, S. K. Y.
(2017) Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts. In O. Seizov & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations (pp. 175–200). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(2018) Developing multimodal literacy through teaching the critical viewing of films in Singapore. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(3), 291–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A., Freebody, P., Shun, L., & Gopinathan, S.
(2005) Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A., & Knight, N.
(2010) Appliable linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(2001) Language, Register and Genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a Global Context (pp. 149–166). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Slater, T.
(2010) Assessing language and content: A functional perspective. In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the Untestable in Language Education (pp. 217–240). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S.
(2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M.
(2009) Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 313–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, L. C. D., & Lan, S.-W.
(2014) Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing (24), 23–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polias, J.
(2016) Apprenticing students into science: doing, talking & writing scientifically. Melbourne: Melbourne Lexis Education.Google Scholar
Rose, D.
(2015a) Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: curriculum genres. A major discussion of R2L pedagogy focused on teacher education. In J. Martin (Ed.), Appliable Linguistics and Academic Discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
(2015b) Building a pedagogic metalanguage II: knowledge genres. A major discussion of R2L pedagogy focused on teacher education. In J. Martin (Ed.), Appliable Linguistics and Academic Discourse Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
Rose, D., & Martin, J.
(2012) Learning to write, Reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy of the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Soong, B., & Mercer, N.
(2011) Improving students’ revision of physics concepts through ICT-based co-construction and prescriptive tutoring. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1055–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soong, B., Mercer, N., & Er, S. S.
(2010) Revision by means of computer-mediated peer discussions. Physics Education, 45(3), 264–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P.-H., & Tan, A.-L.
(2014) Teachers’ ideas and concerns with assessment practices in inquiry science. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore Science Classroom: Research and Practices (pp. 67–87). Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, K. S., & Moje, E. B.
(2010) Relating multimodal representations to the literacies of science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 81–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, K. S., & Putra, G. B. S.
(2016) Disciplinary literacy instructions on writing scientific explanations: a case study from a chemistry classroom in an all-girls school. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 569–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, K.
(2014) Transforming science education by expanding teacher and student collaboration. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 47–66). Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, L.
(1998) “Sound” explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education, 9(2), 199–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 585–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, C., & Hand, B.
(2007) Using a science writing heuristic to promote learning from laboratory. In C. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 67–90). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Wallace, C., Hand, B., & Prain, V.
(2007) Breakthroughs, classroom implications, on-going, and future research. In C. Wallace, B. Hand, & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 123–135). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.
(2001) Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, D., & Lau, C. Y.
(2014) The development and implementation of a guided-inquiry curriculum for secondary school physics. In A.-L. Tan, C.-L. Poon, & S. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 89–110). Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J.
(2014) Constructing a scientific explanation – A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.
(2009) Case study methods. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods for research in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar