Frans H. van Eemeren
is author/editor of the following titles:
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
[Argumentation in Context, 12] 2017. ix, 367 pp.
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
[Argumentation in Context, 9] 2015. ix, 343 pp.
Exploring Argumentative Contexts
[Argumentation in Context, 4] 2012. xx, 398 pp.
Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
[Controversies, 6] 2008. xiii, 278 pp.
Argumentation in Practice
[Controversies, 2] 2005. viii, 368 pp.
is editor/board member of the following book series:
is editor/board member of the following journal:
is author of the following articles:
2021.
2021.
2019.
2019.
2018.
2017.
2017. “Chapter 1. Introduction”.
2017. “Chapter 2. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective”.
2017. “Chapter 10. The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context”.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, 37–58
2017. “Chapter 3. Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse”. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, 123–144
2017. “Chapter 8. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation”. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, 11–36
2017. “Chapter 2. In what sense do modern argumentation theories relate to Aristotle?”. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, 1–10
2017. “Chapter 1. Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics”.
2015.
2015.
2013.
2012.
In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, xiii–xx
2012. “Introduction”.
2009. “Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse”.
2009. “Strategic maneuvering”.
2008. “Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse”.
2008.
2008. “Reasonableness in confrontation: Empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies”.
2007.
2005. “Foreword: Preview by review”.
In Argumentation in Practice, 1–7
2005. “Introduction”. In Argumentation in Practice, 349–365
2005. “22. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectal freedom rule”. In Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual, 55–61
1995. “Argumentation theory”.
1991. “The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective”.