Article published in:
Diagrammatic Reasoning
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 244–263

Iconicity

From sign to system in human communication and language

| School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009
| School of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University, ACT 0200
| Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB
This paper explores the role of iconicity in spoken language and other human communication systems. First, we concentrate on graphical and gestural communication and show how semantically motivated iconic signs play an important role in creating such communication systems from scratch. We then consider how iconic signs tend to become simplified and symbolic as the communication system matures and argue that this process is driven by repeated interactive use of the signs. We then consider evidence for iconicity at the level of the system in graphical communication and finally draw comparisons between iconicity in graphical and gestural communication systems and in spoken language.
Keywords: symbols, signs, icons, language origin, communication, language
Published online: 11 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay
References

References

Armstrong, D.F., & Wilcox, S.
(2007) The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press, USA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B.K.
(2004) The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2), 290–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
(2012) A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromberg, I.
(2007) Systematicity in the Arabic Mental Lexicon. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (Vol. 289, pp. 3–18). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, C.A., & Smith, K.
(2012) Cultural Evolution and Perpetuation of Arbitrary Communicative Conventions in Experimental Microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N.
(2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R, & Tylén, K
. (2016) Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 146, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, T.M.
(2001) Induction and Inherent Similarity. In M. Ramscar & U. Hahn (Eds.), Similarity and Categorization (pp. 29–50). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, T.M., Fay, N., & Garrod, S.
in preparation). From Signs to Structure: The Immediate Emergence of Systematicity in an Interactive Communication Game.
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S.
(2013) How to Bootstrap a Human Communication System. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., & Ellison, T.M.
(2013) The Cultural Evolution of Human Communication Systems in Different Sized Populations: Usability Trumps Learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L.
(2008) The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363(1509), 3553–3561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N.
(2010) The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fay, N., Lister, C.J., Ellison, T.M., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2014) Creating a Communication System from Scratch: Gesture Beats Vocalization Hands Down. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O.
(2006) Grammaticalization and iconicity: Two interacting processes.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N.
(1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51, 696–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B.
(2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 737–767. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B., & Garrod, S.
(2011) Experimental Semiotics: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T.
(2010) The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 100–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T.
(2007) Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Swoboda, N.
(2010) Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Butcher, C., Mylander, C., & Dodge, M.
(1994) Nouns and Verbs in A Self-Styled Gesture System: What′ s in A Name? Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 259–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S.
(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3), 335–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Yang, C., Berwick, R., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M., Watumull, J.,. . . Lewontin, R.
(2014) The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework (Vol. 157): University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.J.
(2006) Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C.F.
(1960) Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In W. Lanyon & W. Tavolga (Eds.), Animal sounds and communication (pp. 392–430). Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
Hupet, M., & Chantraine, Y.
(1992) Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 485–496.Google Scholar
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S.
(2011) Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children. Cognitive Science, 35(3), 575–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M.
(1999) Creation through Contact: Sign Language Emergence and Sign Language Change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony and Development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K.
(2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U.
(1979) The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, W.
(1929) Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Krauss, R.M., & Weinheimer, S.
(1964) Changes in the length of reference phrases as a function of social interaction: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 1, 113–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1966) Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A.
(2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morford, J.P.
(1996) Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people. Language and Communication, 16(2), 165–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M.
(2000) The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature, 404(6777), 495–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S.
(1931-1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G.
(2015) Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Iterative vocal charades: the emergence of conventions in vocal communication. In E.A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10 ). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G.
(2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 277, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E.
(2011) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P.
(1990) Natural-Language and Natural-Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S.
(1999) The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11(03), 315–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hubbard, E.M.
(2001) Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.H., & Griffith, P.L.
(1979) On the scientific status of iconicity. Sign Language Studies, 25(1), 297–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G.
(1985) Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M.
(2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2661–2665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauter, D.A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S.K.
(2010) Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2408–2412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, D., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A.M.
(2014) Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T.C., & Kirby, S.
(2010) Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T.C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G.R.S.
(2009) Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R., & Warglien, M.
(2007) The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7361–7366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shillcock, R., Kirby, S., McDonald, S., & Brew, C.
(2001) Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Paper presented at the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D.M.
(2014) Models of language evolution and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 281–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamariz, M.
(2008) Exploring systematicity between phonological and context-cooccurrence representations of the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon, 3(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Linguistic Structure Evolves to Match Meaning Structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Tamariz, M., Ellison, T.M., Barr, D.J., & Fay, N.
(2014) Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, C.A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S.
(2010) Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urban, M.
(2011) Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A cross-linguistic study. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 199–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.K.
(1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello
2019. Natural reference: A phylo‐ and ontogenetic perspective on the comprehension of iconic gestures and vocalizations. Developmental Science 22:2 Crossref logo
Castillo, Lucía, Kenny Smith & Holly P. Branigan
2019. Interaction Promotes the Adaptation of Referential Conventions to the Communicative Context. Cognitive Science 43:8 Crossref logo
Cohn, Neil
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
2018. Repeated imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1874 ► pp. 20172709 ff. Crossref logo
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda & Simon Garrod
2018. How to Create Shared Symbols. Cognitive Science 42 ► pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata, Takugo Fukaya, Yasuhiro Katagiri & Simon Garrod
2018. Universal Principles of Human Communication: Preliminary Evidence From a Cross-cultural Communication Game. Cognitive Science 42:7 ► pp. 2397 ff. Crossref logo
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Alison Gibson & Margaret Jamieson
2019. Adults are more efficient in creating and transmitting novel signalling systems than children. Journal of Language Evolution 4:1 ► pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo
Lister, C.J., B. Walker & N. Fay
2020. Innovation and enculturation in child communication: a cross-sectional study. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo
Lister, Casey J. & Nicolas Fay
2017. How to create a human communication system. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 314 ff. Crossref logo
Misyak, Jennifer, Takao Noguchi & Nick Chater
2016. Instantaneous Conventions. Psychological Science 27:12 ► pp. 1550 ff. Crossref logo
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
2020. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech ► pp. 002383092091433 ff. Crossref logo
Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2018. The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition 181 ► pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Planer, Ronald J. & David Kalkman
2020. Arbitrary Signals and Cognitive Complexity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ► pp. 000 ff. Crossref logo
Rogers, Shane L., Nicolas Fay & Rachel L Kendal
2016. Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically. PLOS ONE 11:7 ► pp. e0159570 ff. Crossref logo
Worthington, Maulfry, Marjolein Dobber & Bert van Oers
2019. The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery. Educational Studies in Mathematics 102:1 ► pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.