Linguistic Emotivity
Centrality of place, the topic-comment dynamic, and an ideology of pathos in Japanese discourse
| Rutgers University
Linguistic Emotivity explores expressive and emotive meanings in Japanese from the perspective of the Place of Negotiation theory. The Place of Negotiation theory provides a framework for understanding how linguistic signs function in the place of communication (in cognitive, emotive, and interactional places). The theory finds the indexicality of a sign fundamental and views meanings as being negotiated among interactants who share not only information but, more significantly, feelings.
Using analytical tools recognized in conversation and discourse analyses, the book analyzes emotive topics (vocatives, emotive nominals, quotative topics, etc.) and emotive comments (da and ja-nai, interrogatives, stylistic shifts, etc.) in contemporary Japanese discourse. It argues for the importance of emotivity in Japanese, in the context of the Japanese culture of pathos. Linguistic Emotivity challenges the traditional view of language that privileges logos, form, information, and abstraction, and instead, it proposes a philosophical shift toward pathos, expression, emotion, and linguistic event/action.
Using analytical tools recognized in conversation and discourse analyses, the book analyzes emotive topics (vocatives, emotive nominals, quotative topics, etc.) and emotive comments (da and ja-nai, interrogatives, stylistic shifts, etc.) in contemporary Japanese discourse. It argues for the importance of emotivity in Japanese, in the context of the Japanese culture of pathos. Linguistic Emotivity challenges the traditional view of language that privileges logos, form, information, and abstraction, and instead, it proposes a philosophical shift toward pathos, expression, emotion, and linguistic event/action.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 97] 2002. xiv, 481 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
Preface and ackowledgments
|
xi
|
Part 1. Preliminaries
|
|
1. Introduction: Language, emotivity, and pathos
|
3–20
|
2. Background: Emotion, expressive function, and culture
|
21–49
|
Part 2. Theory
|
|
3. The Place of Negotiation theory
|
53–72
|
4. The (re-)turn to place
|
73–84
|
5. Locating and interpreting emotive meanings
|
85–99
|
6. Topic–comment, futaku, and the Rhetoric of Pathos
|
101–121
|
Part 3. Emotive topics
|
|
7. Vocatives and topics
|
123–147
|
8. Emotive nominals
|
149–163
|
9. Quotative topics
|
165–190
|
10. Emotive nan(i) ‘what’
|
191–213
|
Part 4. Emotive comments
|
|
11. Da and ja-nai as commentary strategies
|
217–245
|
12. Interrogatives as emotive comments
|
247–275
|
13. Commenting through stylistic shifts
|
277–304
|
Part 5. Pathos in Japanese discourse
|
|
14. Analyzing expressions of pathos in Oda Nobunaga
|
307–335
|
15. Rhetoric of Pathos in Mini-Jihyoo newspaper articles
|
337–355
|
16. Playing with pathos
: Presentation and negotiation of selves in Long Vacation
|
357–389
|
Part 6. Reflections
|
|
17. Linguistic emotivity and the culture of pathos
|
393–407
|
18. Language, linguistic theory, and ideology
|
409–417
|
Appendix: Information on select data
|
419–421
|
Notes
|
423–434
|
References
|
435–459
|
Data references
|
460–463
|
Author index
|
465–468
|
Subject index
|
469–476
|
“
Linguistic Emotivity makes a valuable contribution to the project of shifting the focus in modern linguistics from a narrow conception of language to one that is more inclusive.”
Joanne Scheibman, Old Dominion University, USA, in Functions of Language Vol. 13:1 (2006)
Cited by
Cited by 25 other publications
No author info given
Brown, H. Paul
Burry, Jane, Andrew Burrow, Robert Amor & Mark Burry
Cantrell, Akiyo M
Honda, Atsuko
IMAI, YASUHIRO
Iwasaki, Shoichi
Koike, Chisato
Martini, Annaclaudia & Dorina-Maria Buda
Moulinou, Iphigenia
Nishimura, Yukiko
Prior, Matthew T.
Rost, Michael
Sadler, Misumi
Sadler, Misumi
Sandu, Roxana
Shinzato, Rumiko
Shinzato, Rumiko
Sugiura, Hideyuki
Tanaka, Lidia
Tsyrlina-Spady, Tatyana & Michael Lovorn
Zawiszová, Halina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
BIC Subject: HP – Philosophy
BISAC Subject: PHI000000 – PHILOSOPHY / General