Reference and Referent Accessibility
Editors
| University of Trontheim
| University of Minnesota
The papers in this volume are concerned with the question of how a speakers intended referent is interpreted by the addressee. Topics include the interpretation of coreferential vs. disjoint reference, the role of intonation, syntactic form and animacy in reference understanding, and the way in which general principles of utterance interpretation constrain possible interpretations of referring expressions. The collection arises from a workshop on reference and referent accessibility which was held at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference in Kobe, Japan, July 25-30, 1993.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 38] 1996. xii, 312 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Introduction
|
7
|
|
13
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
Index of Subjects
|
307
|
|
Index of Names
|
313
|
“Anyone who reads it will appreciate the variety and complexity of the ways and means by which we call things to one another᾿s attention.”
Kent Bach, San Francisco State University
“RRA employs a wealth of examples to provide detailed analyses of the function of various referring expressions.”
Michael Boutin, SIL-Malaysia Branch
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],
Ariel, Mira
2004. Accessibility Marking: Discourse Functions, Discourse Profiles, and Processing Cues.
Discourse Processes 37:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Cornish, Francis
2002. Anaphora: lexico-textual structure or means for utterance integration within discourse? A critique of the functional-grammar account.
Linguistics 40:3
De Mulder, Walter
2000.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Foyn, Camilla Hellum, Mila Vulchanova & Randi Alice Nilsen
2018. The interpretation of focused pronouns in Norwegian children and adults.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Guillot, Céline
2006. Le démonstratif en français ? présentation.
Langue française 152:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Laury, Ritva
2001.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Matsui, Tomoko
1999.
In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1688],
► pp. 228 ff.
Peltola, Rea
2018. Being perceptible: Animacy, existentiality and intersubjectivity in constructions with the Finnish verbkuulua‘to be perceptible (through hearing)’.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
SEOANE, ELENA
2009. Syntactic complexity, discourse status and animacy as determinants of grammatical variation in Modern English.
English Language and Linguistics 13:3 ► pp. 365 ff.
Valin, Jr., Robert D. van
2005.
In Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,
Zerkle, Sandra A. & Jennifer E. Arnold
2016. Discourse attention during utterance planning affects referential form choice.
Linguistics Vanguard 2:s1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General