Chapter published in:
The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions
Edited by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 316] 2020
► pp. 167202
References

References

Dascal, Marcelo
2003Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo, and Elda Weizman
1987 “Contextual Exploitation of Interpretation Clues in Text Understanding: An Integrated Model.” In The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. by Verschueren, Jef, and Marcela Bertuccelli-Papi, 37–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Karen, and Sara Mills
2016Directness and Indirectness across Cultures. Hampshire United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third edition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F., and Elka Ghosh Johnson
2010 “Four Forms of Interactional Indirection.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 292–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Guerda, and Anita Fetzer
2007 “Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives.” In Political Discourse in the MediaPolitical Discourse in the Media, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Guerda Lauerbach, 3–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael
2012 “Indirectness.” In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ed. by Christina Bratt Paulston, Scott F. Kiesling, and Elizabeth S. Rangel, 180–204. Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
1998Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piatti, Guillermina
2019 “En torno a la verdad: algunos usos de marcadores discursivos en la conversación coloquial y en el debate politico.” Presented in the III Congreso de la delegación argentina de la ALFAL y IX Jornadas internacionales de investigación en Filología hispánica . Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Argentina. 24–26 abril de 2019.
Reisigl, Martin
2008 “Political Speeches and the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronica Koller, 243–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1993“Off-record Indirectness and the Notion of Imposition.” Multilingua 12 (1): 69–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter White, and Karen Aijmer
2007 “Presuppositions and ‘Taking for Granted’ in Mass Communicated Political Argument.” In Political Discourse in the Media, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Guerda Lauerbach, 31–68. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Dierdre Wilson
1995Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2011 “The Puzzle of Indirect Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2861–2865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Marcelo Dascal
1991“On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text-Understanding. Journal of Literary Semantics 20 (1): 18–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Dierdre, and Dan Sperber
2006 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2017a “Incongruity-Resolution Cases in Jokes.” Lingua 197: 103–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Relevance-Theoretic Treatments of Humor.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 189–203. New York and London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar