Chapter published in:
The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 151–209

The dynamics of Nepali pronominal distinctions in familiar, casual and formal relationships

| University of Bern
Nepali uses various morphological means formally to distinguish at least five levels of deference in verbal interaction. In addition to the three Nepali second person pronouns, for each of which the Nepali verb distinguishes separate conjugated forms, Nepali speakers also make use of the deferentially conjugated verb in combination with the respectful term hajur or with kinship terms to give expression to different levels of deference and formality. Moreover, the Nepali verb distinguishes a separate mediopassively conjugated construction used exclusively when the notional subject of the sentence is a member of the former royal family. Speakers can also exploit the device of the ambiguous avoidance term āphu ‘self’ or make oblique reference to the second person through the use of the first person plural when a speaker is uncertain of the register which would be most appropriate.Unlike the simple two-term system found in many Western languages, such as French tu vs. vous, the choice of pronoun and conjugation between intimate friends and indeed between higher caste married couples tends to be highly asymmetrical. The semiotics of this asymmetry is commensurate with the degree of intimacy which the two individuals feel towards each other. This phenomenon, strikingly unfamiliar to the contemporary Occidental, illustrates rather vividly how different the sensibilities and semantic underpinnings of the many tiers of deference expressed by pronominal usage and other morphological parameters in Nepali are from those of an intimate interaction whereby the two European individuals might simply be able to tutoyer each other. A descriptive account is provided of actual usage, and an analytical exposition of the semiotics of this morphologically diverse system of indexing relationships in Nepali speech is presented.
Keywords: Nepali, pronouns, pronominal agreement, deferential systems, honorifics, pronominal morphology, semiotics, sociolinguistics
Published online: 23 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.07van
References

References

Aryāl, Bala Rām
2010 Nepali Language, Simplified Handbook of Nepali Language for Its Expatriate Learners. Kathmandu: ShiSham Prakashan.Google Scholar
Ayton, Jason Alexander
1820 A Grammar of the Népalese Language. Calcutta: Hindoostanee Press by Philip Pereira.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988 Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, pp. 253–276 in Thomas Albert Sebeok, ed., Style in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Buḍā Magar, Harṣa Bahādur Bhādra
2053 (ad 1996) Magar jāti ra unkā sāmājik saṃskār. Kathmandu: Śrīmatī Pupāvatī Buḍā Magar Magar (esp. pp.61–72).Google Scholar
Clark, Thomas Welbourne
1963 Introduction to Nepali. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Davids, Irene Maria Hendrina, and George van Driem
1985 ‘Limbu kinship terminology: a description’, Kailash, Journal of Himalayan Studies, xii (1–2): 115–156.Google Scholar
Doherty, Victor S.
1974 ‘The organizing principles of Gurung kinship’, Kailash, ii (4): 273–301.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1987 A Grammar of Limbu. West Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language (two volumes). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2017 ‘The morphosyntax of Himalayan languages’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Fürer Haimendorf, Christoph
1956 ‘Ethnographic note on the Tamangs of Nepal’, Eastern Anthropologist, 9: 166–177.Google Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen Anne
2013 A Descriptive Grammar of Two Magar Dialects of Nepal: Tanahu and Syangja Magar. Ann Arbor: Proquest.Google Scholar
Glover, Warren William, Jessie R. Glover and Deu Bahadur Gurung
1977 Gurung-Nepali-English Dictionary with English-Gurung and Nepali-Gurung Indices. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew R.
1978 ‘Preliminary report on the Langtang region’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 5 (2): 51–68.Google Scholar
Höfer, András
1969 ‘Preliminary report on a field research in a Western Tamang group, Nepal’, Bulletin of the International Committee for Urgent Anthropological and Ethnological Research, 11: 17–31.Google Scholar
Jain, Dhanesh Kumar
1969 ‘Verbalization of respect in Hindi’, Anthropological Linguistics, 11 (3): 79–97.Google Scholar
1973 Pronominal Usage in Hindi: A Sociolinguistic Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Korolëv, Nikolaj Ivanovič.
1965 Jazyk Nepali. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
1968 ‘Kratkij očerk grammatiki jazyka Nepali’, pp. 1211–1328 in Izrail’ Samojlovič Rabinovič, Nikolaj Ivanovič Korolëv and Aganina Ljudmila Aleksandrovna, eds., Nepal’sko-Russkij Slovar’. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ‘Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija’.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd
1996 L’inférentiel du Népali, pp. 109–123 in Zlatka Guentchéva, ed., L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Péeters.Google Scholar
Oppitz, Michael
1982 ‘Death and kin amongst the Northern Magar’, Kailash, ix (4): 377–421.Google Scholar
Orwell, George
1945 Animal Farm: A Fairy Story. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Pignède, Bernard
1966 [posthumous]. Les Gurungs, une population himalayenne du Népal. Paris et La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rāṇā, Prabhākar Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur, and Paśupati Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur Rāṇā and Gautam Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur Rāṇā.
2002 The Ranas of Nepal. New Delhi: Georges Naef.Google Scholar
Regmi, Ambika
2013 A Grammar of Magar Kaike. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2014 Analyzed texts of Magar Kaike. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Sālokya सालोक्य.
2011 बधाई छ बाबुराम सरकारलाई, रेकर्ड तोडेकोमा Badhāī cha Bāburām Sarkārlāī, rekarḍ toḍekomā (13 November 2011) <http://​www​.mysansar​.com​/archives​/?p​=22995>.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth L.
1976 ‘The Nepali system of honorific registers’, Kailash, iv (3): 213–225.Google Scholar
Sever, Adrian
1993 Nepal under the Ranas: Photographs from the Collection of Jharendra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana. Sittingbourne: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Shrestha, Padma Prakash
ed. 1986 Nepal Rediscovered: The Rana Court 1846–1951: Photographs of the Archives of the Nepal Kingdom Foundation. New Delhi: Time Books International.Google Scholar
Sirhandi, Marcella
2009 Royal Nepal Through the Lens of Richard Gordon Matzen. Chicago: Serindia Publications.Google Scholar
Tripāṭhī, Vasudev, and Ballabh Maṇi Dāhāl
eds. vs 2040 (i.e. ad 1983–84) Nepālī Br̥hat Śabdakoś. Kathmandu: Nepāl Rājakīya Prajñā-Pratiṣṭhān.Google Scholar
Turin, Mark
2001 ‘Call me uncle: An outsider’s experience of Nepali kinship’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 28 (2): 277–283.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph Lilley
1931 A Comparative and Etymological Dictionary of the Nepali Language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Company.Google Scholar
Uccastarīya samiti
. vs 2058 [ad 2001] श्री ५ महाराजािधराज सरकारका जुनाफमा नारायणहिटी राजदरबारको २०५८ जेठ १९ को घटना सम्बन्धमा तथ्य जाहेर गर्न गिठत उच्चस्तरीय समितिले जाहेर गरेको प्रतिवेदन Śrī 5 Mahārājādhirāj sarkār-kā junāph-mā Nārāyaṇhiṭī rājdarbār-ko 2058 Jeṭh 19 ko ghaṭanā sambandh-mā tathya jāher garna gaṭhit uccastarīya samiti-le jāher gareko prativedan. Kathmandu: His Majesty’s Government of Nepal [315 pp.].Google Scholar
Verma, M. K., and T. N. Sharma
1979 Intermediate Nepali Structure (two volumes). New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Vinding, Michael
1979 ‘A preliminary report on kinship terminologies of the Bodish section of Sino-Tibetan speaking peoples’, Kailash, vii (3–4): 191–225.Google Scholar