Robert Brandom's Normative Inferentialism
| University of Pisa
The philosophy of language of Robert Brandom is based on a theoretical structure composed of three main elements: the normative analysis of linguistic practices, the inferential characterization of conceptual contents and the expressive articulation of the relations between the former two. Normative pragmatics aims to explain how linguistic practices are sufficient to confer contentful states in those who engage in them. Inferential semantics provides a theory of such pragmatic significances in terms of the inferential relations that articulate conceptual contents. Rational expressivism is the thesis that concept application is essentially a process of turning something that can only be done into something that can also be said. Such a threefold structure is the core of normative inferentialism. This book is a concise, self-contained and comprehensive presentation of this philosophical enterprise. It guides the reader through the analysis of Brandom's imposing theoretical apparatus, the discovery of the roots of his approach in American pragmatism and German idealism, till the exploration of some of its most interesting and recent outcomes in pragmatics and semantics. It is a valuable resource for both those who approach Brandom's work for the first time and those who are interested in the potential of normative inferentialism.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 280] 2017. xi, 245 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
|
ix–x
|
Abbreviations
|
xi–xii
|
Chapter 1. Introduction
|
1–14
|
Chapter 2. The grounds of pragmatic significance
|
15–60
|
Chapter 3. The articulation of conceptual content
|
61–108
|
Chapter 4. Incompatibility semantics
|
109–144
|
Chapter 5. Exploring incompatibility
|
145–174
|
Chapter 6. From inferentialism to idealism, and back
|
175–206
|
Chapter 7. Conclusions
|
207–210
|
References
|
211–222
|
Appendix
|
223–238
|
Index of names
|
237–238
|
Index of subjects
|
239–245
|
“I enjoyed reading this book, and have learned much from it. The text is generally written in a lucid, engaging style, and shows evidence of wide and deep study not only of RB’s work but in the mainstream C20 traditions of philosophy of language and semantic/pragmatic theory. Readers who are less familiar with RB’s antecedents and foils in these traditions will benefit from GT’s careful exposition and critique of their respective positions.”
Rodger Kibble, University of London, on Linguist List 29.4855
References
References
Alchourrón, Carlos E., Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson
Anderson, Alan R. and Nuel D. Belnap
Anderson, Alan R., Nuel D. Belnap, and John M. Dunn
Avron, Arnon
Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish
Block, Ned
Boghossian, Paul
2011a “Knowing and Representing: Reading (between the lines of) Hegel's Introduction.” Unpublished presentation. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich.
2014 “A Spirit of Trust: A Semantic Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology.” URL http://www.pitt.edu/brandom/spirit_of_trust_2014.html, unpublished book.
Carnap, Rudolf
Chisholm, Roderick and Wilfrid Sellars
1957 “Intentionality and the Mental: Chisholm-Sellars Correspondence on Intentionality.” In Minnesota Studies in The Philosophy of Science, ed. by Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, and Grover Maxwell, vol. II, 225–308. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Reprinted in Intentionality, Mind and Language, ed. by Ausonio Marras, 214-248. Chicago:University of Illinois Press, 1972.
deVries, Willem and Timm Triplett
Dummett, Michael
Dunn, John M. and Greg Restall
Dunn, John M.
Fermüller, Christian
Fodor, Jerry and Ernest Lepore
Frege, Gottlob
1879 Begriffsschrift: Eine Der Arithmetische Nachgebildete Formelsprache des Reinen Denkens. Halle: Nebert. En. tr. by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as Begriffsschrift, A Formula Language, Modeled Upon That of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought, in (van Heijenoort 1967). En. tr. (chapter 1) by P. Geach in (Geach and Black 1969).
Gärdenfors, Peter and David Makinson
Gentzen, Gerhard
Gibbard, Allan
Göcke, Benedikt Paul, Martin Pleitz, and Hanno von Wulfen
Grönert, Peter
Grover, Dorothy L., Joseph L. Kamp, and Nuel D. Belnap
Habermas, Jürgen
Hattiangadi, Anandi
Hegel, Georg W. F.
Hodges, Wilfrid
James, William
Janssen, Theo
Johansson, B.
Kant, Immanuel
Kraus, Sarit, Daniel J. Lehmann, and Menachem Magidor
Kripke, Saul A.
Kripke, Saul A.
Kukla, Rebecca and Lance, Mark
Laikötter, Sebastian, Bernd Prien, Till Schepelmann, and Christian Thein
Lance, Mark
Lance, Mark and Philip Kramer
Lance, Mark and Rebecca Kukla
Laurier, Daniel
Leibniz, Gottfried W.
Levi, Isaac
Loeffler, Ronald
Loemker, Leroy E.
Macbeth, Danielle
MacFarlane, John
Makinson, David
Martinich, Aloysius and David Sosa
McDowell, John
Pagin, Peter and Dag Westerståhl
Peacocke, Christopher
Peter of Spain
von Plato, Jan and Gerard Gentzen
Pohl, Michael, Raja Rosenhagen, and Arne M. Weber
Prawitz, Dag
Price, Huw
Prien, Bernd and David P. Schweikard
Putnam, Hilary
Read, Stephen
Rosen, Gideon
Routley, Richard and Robert K. Meyer
Schroeder-Heister, Peter
Searle, John
Sellars, Wilfrid
1963b “Phenomenalism.” In Sellars (1963c), Sellars, 1963c60–105. Reprinted in Intentionality, Minds and Perception, ed. by Hector-Neri Castañeda, 215-74, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1967. Also reprinted in (Sellars 2007), 303-349.
Shapiro, Lionel
Strawson, Peter
Tarski, Alfred
Taylor, Charles
2010 “Language Not Mysterious?” In Reading Brandom: On Making it Explicit, ed. by London: Routledge.
Bernhard Weiss and Jeremy Wanderer, 32–47. London: Routledge.
Turbanti, Giacomo
Weiss, Bernhard and Jeremy Wanderer
Westerståll, Dag
Whitehead, Alfred North and Bertrand Russell
Subjects
Philosophy
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN016000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Semantics