Article published in:
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 141169
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020.  In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia
2012 “Follow-Ups in Online Political Discussions”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34.Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte​/,2012​/7165/Google Scholar
Bassett, Elizabeth H., and Kate O’Riordan
2002 “Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model.” Ethics and Information Technology 4: 233–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nancy
1996 “Agreements and Disagreements in a Computer-Mediated Discussion.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 315–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, Brook
2012“Disagreements and Agreements in Personal/Diary Blogs: A Closer Look at Responsiveness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1607–1622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Language and Power in Blogs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
2012 “Follow-Ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews and Parliamentary Questions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 35–47. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte​/,2012​/7165/Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcom and David Brazil
1992“Exchange Structure.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. by Malcom Coulthard, 50–78. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebreton, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, Willis
1981Spoken Discourse. A model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade
1997Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2012 “Quotations in monoglossic and dialogic political discourse”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 72–86. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte/Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
2006The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion.Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granato, Luisa
1996Estructura discursiva de la entrevista radial. La Plata: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K., and Christian Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Christian R.
2012Cohesive Profiling. Meaning and Interaction in Personal Blogs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janney, Richard, W.
2012 “Columbine Revisited: Follow-Ups and the Fractalizations of Events in the Modern Media.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 134–150. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte/Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
2012 “Editorial and its Comments: Follow-Ups in a Discussion Forum.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 151–164. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte/Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas, Weiwu Zhang, Shannon Bichard, and Trent Seltzer
2011 “United We Stand? Online Social Network Sites and Civic Engagement”. In A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 185–222. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney
2004 “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Discourse and Technology, ed. by Philip Lavine and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1995Les interactions verbales. Tome I (10th edition). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kozinets, Robert
2010Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky
1967 “Narrative Analysis. Oral Versions of Narrative Experiences.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela, and Andreas H. Jucker
2011 “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1422–1434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2003Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin James R., and Peter White
2005The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave Mackmillan.Google Scholar
Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela
2013Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media. PhD. Thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Available at http://​opac​.nebis​.ch​/ediss​/20131752​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Protection of Human Subjects, US Federal Code Title 45, Section 46 2009, available online at: www​.hhs​.gov​/ohrp​/humansubjects​/guidance​/45cfr46​.htm (accessed 8 October 2012)
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Malcom Coulthard
1978 [1975]Towards and Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sivenkova, Maria
2012 “Metacommunicative Follow-Ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats and Blogs.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 248–262. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte/Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy B.M.
1994English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Gordon
1998The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives. A Systemic Functional Approach to Lexis. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael
2002Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar