Article published in:The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 193–211
A true authoritarian type
How fonts can facilitate positive opinions for powerful groups
To convey authority in a document, people choose specific typefaces (or fonts). Studies find that repeating a message makes it more persuasive, and that different typefaces lead to different associations. Also, statements are more memorable when written in harder-to-read typefaces; yet more believable for easier-to-read ones. In each of the two present experiments, surveys measuring authoritarianism were written in various typefaces. The first experiment sought evaluations of groups such as the army and police. The second experiment included subject matters like illegal wiretapping by the F.B.I. The results suggested participants had more positive views for authoritarian groups and more likely supported morally questionable actions when the surveys were written in an easy-to-read typeface.
Published online: 12 June 2014
2006 The Authoritarians, http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
de Jong, Cees W., Alston W. Purvis, and Friedrich Friedl
Diemand-Yauman, Connor, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, and Erikka B. Vaughan
Fiske, Susan T.
Hathcoat, John D., and Laura L. B. Barnes
2012 “Teens, Smartphones, and Texting.” Pew Research Center. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx
McLuhan, Marshall, and Quentin Fiore
Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
Song, Hyukin, and Norbert Schwarz
Tsai, Claire I., and Ann L. McGill
Van Hiel, Alain, Isle Cornelis, Arne Roets, and Barbara De Clercq
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.