Article published in:
Methodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research (Part I)Edited by Gonia Jarema, Gary Libben and Chris Westbury
[The Mental Lexicon 5:3] 2010
► pp. 421–435
Chinese as a natural experiment
James Myers | National Chung Cheng University
The Chinese lexicon is characterized by its typologically unique one-to-one-to-one mapping of morphemes, syllables, and orthographic characters. This architecture poses practical difficulties for the psycholinguist wanting to study lexical processing in Chinese. More seriously, seen as a natural experiment, Chinese challenges assumptions that processing models traditionally make about the roles of phonemes, morphemes, lemmas, and words in lexical access. It is argued that cross-linguistic variation in lexical processing cannot be accommodated by simply modifying lexical processing models, but instead what is needed is a universal learning model. Suggestions are given for how such a model could be tested empirically by extending methods already used for testing language-specific lexical processing.
Keywords: phonology, Chinese, lexical processing, orthography, morphology, cross-language psycholinguistics
Published online: 17 February 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Derwing, Bruce L. & David Eddington
Lee, Chao-Yang & Seth Wiener
Liu, Jiang & Seth Wiener
O'Séaghdha, Padraig G.
Wiener, Seth, Kiwako Ito & Shari R Speer
Wiener, Seth, Kiwako Ito & Shari R. Speer
Wiener, Seth, Chao‐Yang Lee & Liang Tao
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.