Chapter published in:
Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar and Kristina Š. Despot
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 8] 2019
► pp. 4973
References

References

Barcelona, A.
(2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Metonymy is not just a lexical phenomenon. In C. Alm-Arvius, N.-L. Johannesson, & David C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival  (Stockholm Studies in English 105) (pp. 13–46). Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.Google Scholar
(2018) General description of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project, with particular attention to the issues of hierarchy, prototypicality, and taxonomic domains. In O. Blanco-Carrión, R. Pannain, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 27–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczwonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Blanco-Carrión, O.
(2018) Conventionality and linguistic domain(s) involved in the characterization of metonymies (for the creation of a detailed typology of metonymy). In O. Blanco-Carrión, R. Pannain, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 55–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Carrión, O., Barcelona, A., & Pannain, R.
(Eds.) (2018) Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1977) Bridging. In P. N. Johnson-Laird, & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 411–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmott, C.
(1999) Embodied in a Constructed World: Narrative processing, knowledge representation, and indirect anaphora. In K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, & L. Noordman (Eds.), Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics (pp. 5–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Gomariz, I.
(2018) Analysis of metonymic triggers, metonymic chaining and patterns of interaction with metaphor and with other metonymies as part of the metonymy database in the Córdoba Project. In O. Blanco-Carrión, R. Pannain, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 75–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
(2005) The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32) (pp. 353–386). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2006) Metonymy as a usage event. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (Applications in Cognitive Linguistics 1) (pp. 147–185). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(2007) Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy? In O. Blanco-Carrión, R. Pannain, & A. Barcelona, (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 269–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
(2018)  Molly married money: Reflections on conceptual metonymy. In O. Blanco-Carrión, R. Pannain, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues (pp. 161–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014) On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: towards settling some controversies. In J. Littlemore, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 143–166). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A.
(2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistics perspective (Human Cognitive Processing 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2007) High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, et al. (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 33–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L.
(2001) Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language & Communication, 21(4), 321–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.
(1995[1989]) Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar