The Evaluation of Language Regimes

Theory and application to multilingual patent organisations

| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027200570 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027270450 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Building on existing analytical frameworks, this book provides a new methodology allowing different language policies in international multilingual organisations (or “language regimes”) to be compared and evaluated on the basis of criteria such as efficiency and fairness. It explains step-by-step how to organise the evaluation of language regimes and how to design and interpret indicators for such evaluation. The second part of this book applies the theoretical framework to the evaluation of the language policy of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) division of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO). Results show that an increase in linguistic diversity of the language regimes of patent organisations can both improve the efficiency of the patent system and lead to a more balanced distribution of costs among countries. This book is a resource for scholars in language policy and planning and for policy-makers in the international and European patent system.
[Multilingualism and Diversity Management, 3]  2014.  xxi, 380 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/mdm.3
Table of Contents
List of figures
ix–xii
List of tables
xiii–xvi
List of abbreviations
xvii–xx
Acknowledgements
xxi–xxii
Introduction
1–6
Setting the scene
Chapter 1. The need for evaluation in language policy
9–34
Part I. Theory
Chapter 2. The criteria of efficiency and fairness
37–62
Chapter 3. Multilingual communication as an object 
of evaluation
63–84
Chapter 4. The evaluation process
85–112
Chapter 5. Indicators
113–144
Part II. Application to multilingual patent organisations
Chapter 6. Multilingualism and patents
147–194
Chapter 7. The language regime of the PCT system
195–274
Chapter 8. The language regime of the EPO
275–320
Conclusions
Chapter 9. Summary and perspectives
323–342
Annexes and bibliography
Appendices
345–354
References
355–372
Index
373–380
“Despite the inherent difficulty of tackling topics pertaining to multiple disciplines, Michele Gazzola manages to bring together the theory, methodology and application of language regime evaluation, and he does so with remarkable consistency using the tools of economic analysis. The result is an easy-to-follow, yet analytically rigorous, interdisciplinary text: a must-have for scholars in language policy and planning, as well as researchers in intellectual property.”
“This study is an important contribution to the intricacies of multilingualism. An onset is given to the theory of language policy evaluation and this is badly needed in Europe and elsewhere. It makes this book a must for every scholar who takes multilingualism seriously.”
“The economics of language and language usage is a relatively new but fast expanding field of research. In this book Michele Gazzola sets a new standard for the analysis of language policies in international organizations. It combines a clear and concise discussion of the welfare economics basis for the evaluation of the efficiency and fairness of such policies with a detailed application to the praxis in international patent organizations. The evaluation of language policy and language planning is a discipline where traditionally ad hoc evaluation criteria tend to dominate. The combination of a stringent theoretical basis with down-to-earth applications makes Michele Gazzola’s book new and unique in the area of language policy.”
“This study, is not the final word in language policy evaluation, but it is very well done, and moves the LPP field forward by more closely integrating to it the growing sub-field of language economics, and a more disciplined approach to public policy analysis and evaluations. Gazzola is clear about what he leaves out of this study, and he is explicitly clear about where his operational definitions/conceptualizations are placed within contested areas of LPP research and evaluation. These aspects of this work strengthen the value of the study rather than constrain its utility to the field, and makes the book deserving of a close read by those involved in language policy making, language strategists, scholars, and those aspiring to be such.”
“This volume is extremely well organized; its meticulous use of headings, tables, and figures will likely aid readers’ comprehension of the rich details and complex ideas it conveys. [...] Given its interdisciplinary nature, the text will be of interest for LPP scholars exploring new approaches to LPP research and theory, as well as evaluation experts and economists interested in the complex role language plays in various settings. Additionally, those whose work involves intellectual property rights may better recognize the impact of specific (language related) organizational decisions within the industry.”
References

References

Abbott, Frederick M., Thomas Cottier, and Francis Gurry
2007  International Intellectual Property in an Integrated World Economy . The Hague: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly
1999 “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4): 1243–1284 http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/2586963. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aragonés Lumeras, Maité.
2009  Estudio descriptivo multilingüe del resumen de patente: aspectos contextuales y retórico [Descriptive multilingual study of patent abstract: Rethorical and contextual aspects]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Archontopoulos, Eugenio, Dominique Guellec, Niels Stevnsborg, Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, and Nicolas Van Zeebroeck
2007 “When Small Is Beautiful: Measuring the Evolution and Consequences of the Voluminosity of Patent Applications at the Epo.” Information Economics and Policy 19: 103–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnsperger, Christian
and Philippe Van Parijs 2000  Ethique économique et sociale [Economic and social ethics]. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Arora, Ashish, Andrea Fosfuri, and Alfonso Gambardella
2001  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy . Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aunger, Edmund A.
2005 “Diversité régionale et inégalité politique [Regional diversity and political inequality].” In Vitalité Des Communautés, Confiance Des Communautés. Forum De Recherche Sur Les Langues Officielles , ed. by William Floch and Yves Frenette. Ottawa: Patrimoine canadien.Google Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B.
1994 “ ‘Unplanned’ Language Policy and Planning.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 14: 82–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Ian, Richard T. Carson, and Brett Day
2002  Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belli, Pedro
2001  Economic Analysis of Investment Operations: Analytical Tools and Practical Applications . Washington (DC): World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano
2007  Fondamenti di sociolinguistica [Sociolinguistics] (4th). Rome/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Berthoud, Anne-Claude, François Grin, and Georges Lüdi
(eds) 2013, forthcoming. The Dylan Book (Language Dynamics and Management of Diversity) . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bezzi, Claudio
2003  Il disegno della ricerca valutativa [An outline of evaluation] (2nd). Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark
1993  The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain (2nd ed.). Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W.
and Neil Bruce 1984  Welfare Economics . Oxford-New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boardman, Anthony E., David H. Greenberg, Aidan R. Vining, and David L. Weimer
2006  Cost-Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practice (3rd). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bos, Frits
2008 “Uses of National Accounts: History, International Standardization and Applications in the Netherlands.” MPRA (Munich Personal Research Papers in Economics Archive) Paper 9387 . Munich: Munich University.Google Scholar
Bossert, Walter, Conchita D’Ambrosio, and Eliana La Ferrara
2011 “A Generalized Index of Fractionalization.” Economica 78 (312): 723–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossert, Walter, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, and Yongsheng Xu
2003 “Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (4): 405–421.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Pierre
2006  Langue du travail : indicateurs relatifs à l’évolution de la population active et à l’utilisation des langues au travail en 2001 [Language at the workplace: indicators on the evolution of active population and on the usage of languages in the workplace in 2011]. Québec: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
2008  La langue de l’enseignement : indicateurs pour l’éducation préscolaire, l’enseignement primaire et secondaire, le collégial et l’université [The language of teaching: indicators for pre-primary education, primary and secondary education, colleges and universities]. Québec: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
2001  Langage et pouvoir symbolique . Paris: Éditions du Seuil. [Published in 1991 by Polity Press with the title: Language and Symbolic Power , reviwed and enlarged edition of Ce que parler veut dire, Paris: Fayard, 1982].Google Scholar
Bourdin, Joël
2008  Rapport d’information sur le défi des classements dans l’enseignement supérieur [Report on the challange of university rankings]. 442. Paris: French Senate.Google Scholar
Brent, Robert J.
1997  Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bretegnier, Aude
and Gudrun Ledegen (eds) 2002  Sécurité/Insécurité Linguistique [Linguistics security/insecurity]. Actes de la 5° Table Ronde du Moufia. Paris: L’Harmattan/A.U.F.Google Scholar
Breton, Albert
1998 “The Economic Analysis of Language.” In Economic Approaches to Language and Bilingualism ed. by Albert Breton, 1–34. Ottawa: Canadian Heritage Series.Google Scholar
and Peter Mieszkowski 1975 “The Returns to Investment in Language. The Economics of Bilingualism.” Working Paper 7512 . Toronto: University of Toronto, Institute for Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Calvet, Louis-Jean
1974  Linguistique et colonialisme [Linguistc and colonialism]. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
1996  Les politiques linguistiques [language policies]. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
1999  La guerre des langues et les politiques linguistiques [The war of languages and language policies](2 ed.). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Cannavò, Leonardo.
1999  Teoria e pratica degli indicatori nella ricerca sociale [Theory and practice of indicators in social research], (vol. 1). Milan: LED- Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia e Diritto.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda
2005 “The Ideological Limits of Linguistic Diversity in Canada.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26 (6): 481–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carey, James W.
1992  Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society . New York-London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castillo Lluch, Mónica
and Johannes Kabatex (eds) 2006  Las lenguas de España [Languages of Spain]. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Castonguay, Charles
2005  Les indicateurs généraux de vitalité des langues au Québec: comparabilité et tendances 1971–2001 [General indicators of the vitality of languages in Quebec: comparability and trend 1971–2001]. Québec: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Ceccagnoli, Marco, Alfonso Gambardella, Paola Giuri, Georg Licht, and Myriam Marian
2005  Study on Evaluating the Knowledge Economy What Are Patents Actually Worth? The Value of Patents for Today’s Economy and Society. Final Report for Lot 1 . Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Champ, Patricia A., Kevin J. Boyle, and Thomas C. Brown
(eds) 2003  A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick
1995 “Ce que communiquer veut dire [What communicating means].” Sciences humaines 51: 20–23.Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R.
and Paul W. Miller 2007  The Economics of Language: International Analyses . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chua, Siew Kheng Catherine
2010 “Singapore’s Language Policy and Its Globalised Concept of Bi(Tri)Lingualism.” Current Issues in Language Planning 11 (4): 413–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Church, Jeffrey
and Ian King 1993 “Bilingualism and Network Externalities.” Canadian Journal of Economics 27 (2): 335–345.Google Scholar
Coccossis, Harry
and Peter Nijkamp 1995  Planning for Our Cultural Heritage . Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
Coddington, Alan
1972 “Positive Economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique 5 (1): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep M.
1996a  La utilitat del bilingüisme [The utility of bilingualism]. Barcelona: Edicions 62.Google Scholar
1996b “To Translate or to Learn Languages? An Evaluation of Social Efficiency.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121: 181–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Combeau, Jacques
2007 “La traduction des brevets: quand la technique rencontre le droit [Paten translation: When technique meets law.” Traduire (212): 62–69.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert L.
1989  Language Planning and Social Change . Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeil, Jean-Claude
2007  L’embarras des langues. Origine, conception et évolution de la politique linguistique québécoise [Embarassment of languages: Origin, conception and evolution of Quebec language policy] . Montreal: Québec Amérique.Google Scholar
Cornes, Richard
and Todd Sandler 1996  The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (2nd). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2010  The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (3rd). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dachsa, Bernhard
and Andreas Pykab 2010 “What Drives the Internationalisation of Innovation? Evidence from European Patent Data.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19 (1): 71–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalmazzone, Silvana
1999 “Economics of Language: A Network Externalities Approach.” In Exploring the Economics of Language , ed. by Albert Breton, 63–88. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Heritage.Google Scholar
Danguy, Jérôme
and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie 2011 “Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Community Patent.” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2 (2): 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Briey, Laurent
and Philippe Van Parijs 2002 “La justice linguistique comme justice coopérative [Linguistic justice as cooperative justice].” Revue de philosophie économique 5: 5–37.Google Scholar
De Rassenfosse, Gaetan
and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe 2009 “A Policy Insight into the R&D–Patent Relationship.” Research Policy 38: 779–792. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie 2012 “On the Price Elasticity of Demand for Patents.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 74 (1): 58–77.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Helder
2007 “Language Policy and Political Philosophy: On the Emerging Linguistic Justice Debate.” Language Problems & Language Planning 31 (1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, Abram
2001  Words of the World. The Global Language System . Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dell’Aquila, Vittorio
and Gabriele Iannàccaro 2004  La pianificazione linguistica. Lingue, società e istituzioni [Language planning. Languages, societies and institutions]. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Desmet, Klaus, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín, and Shlomo Weber
2009 “Linguistic Diversity and Redistribution.” Journal of European Economic Association 7 (6): 1291–1318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Pietrantonio, Sara
2012  L’insegnamento delle lingue straniere come politica pubblica: il caso italiano [Public policy on foreign-language teaching: The Italian case], Master dissertation. Università degli Studi dell’Aquila: L’Aquila.Google Scholar
Doğançay-Aktuna, Seran.
1997 “Language Planning.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 8: Reseach Methods in Language and Education , ed. by Nancy H. Hornberger and David Corson, 15–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Dunn, William N.
2004  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (3rd). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Edwards, John
(ed) 1998  Language in Canada . Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
EPO
2008  How to Get a European Patent. Guide for Applicants. Part 2 - Pct Procedure before the Epo – “Euro-Pct” . Munich: European Patent Office (EPO).Google Scholar
2009  Patent Teaching Kit . Munich: European Patent Office (EPO).Google Scholar
2010a  Annual Report 2009 . Munich: European Patent Office (EPO).Google Scholar
2010b  Financial Statements. Accounting Period 2010 . Munchen: European Patent Office (EPO).Google Scholar
2010c  How to Get a European Patent. Guide for Applicants. Part 1 . Munich: European Patent Office (EPO).Google Scholar
European Commission
1999a  Means Collection — Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programmes (6 volumes). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
1999b  Principal Evaluation Techniques and Tools, Means Collection — Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programmes (vol. 3). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
1999c  Selection and Use of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation, Means Collection — Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programmes (vol. vol. 2). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
2005  The European Indicator of Language Competence (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council) . COM(2005) 356 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
2007  Promoting Innovation through Patents. Green Paper on the Community Patent and the Patent System in Europe . COM (2007) Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
2008  Evalsed: The Resource for the Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development . Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
2011a  Impact Assessment. Accompanying Document to the Proposal for a Council Regulation Implementing Enhanced Cooperation in the Area of the Creation of Unitary Patent Protection with Regard to the Applicable Translation Arrangements . SEC(2011) 482/2. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
2011b  Impact Assessment. Accompanying Document to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council Implementing Enhanced Cooperation in the Area of the Creation of Unitary Patent Protection and Proposal for a Council Regulation Implementing Enhanced Cooperation in the Area of the Creation of Unitary Patent Protection with Regard to the Applicable Translation Arrangements . SEC(2011) 482/2 - Commission Staff Working Paper. Brussels: European Commission,.Google Scholar
2011c  User Language Preferences Online . Flash Eurobarometer 313. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
2012a  Europeans and Their Languages . Special Eurobarometer 386. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
2012b  First European Survey on Language Competences . Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Court of Auditors
2005 “Special Report No 5/2005. Interpretation Expenditure Incurred by the Parliament, the Commission and the Council, Together with the Institutions’ Replies.” Official Journal of the European Union C 291/1 (23.11.2005).Google Scholar
2006 “Special Report No 9/2006 Concerning Translation Expenditure Incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council Together with the Institutions’ Replies.” Official Journal of the European Union C 284/01 (21.11.2006).Google Scholar
Fabà, Albert, Pilar López, Joan Solé Carnardons, and Noemí Ubach
2000 “Ofercat: Indicadors Sobre L’oferta De Català a Santa Coloma De Gramenet.” Llengua i Ús - Revista tècnica de Política Lingüística (18): 53–58.Google Scholar
Fettes, Mark
1997 “Language Planning and Education.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 1: Language Policy and Political Issues in Education , ed. by Ruth Wodak and David Corson, 13–22. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Fidrmuc, Jan
and Victor Ginsburgh 2007 “Languages in the European Union: The Quest for Equality and Its Cost.” European Economic Review 51: 1351–1369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fidrmuc, Jan, Victor Ginsburgh, and Shlomo Weber
2004 “Le Français, Deuxième Langue De L’union Européenne?” Économie publique 15 (2): 43–63.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Sabine
2010a “Approaches to Fair Linguistic Communication.” European Journal of Language Policy 2 (1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b “The English-as-a-Lingua-Franca Approach. Linguistic Fair Play?” Language Problems & Language Planning 34 (3): 201–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A.
1991  Reversing Language Shift . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua Aaron
1971  Sociolinguistics . Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, Carol Taylor
and Peter Tymms 2002 “Technical and Ethical Issues in Indicator Systems: Doing Things Right and Doing Wrong Things.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 10 (6): 1–28.Google Scholar
Foray, Dominique
2009  L’économie de la connaissance [The knowledge economy]. Paris: La decouverte.Google Scholar
Francard, Michel
1993 “L’insécurité linguistique dans les communautés francophones périphériques [linguistic insecurity in French-speaking peripherical communities].” Cahiers de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain 19.
Franceschini, Rita
1998  Riflettere sull’interazione. Un’introduzione alla metacomunicazione e all’analisi conversazionale [Thining about interaction: An introduction to metacommunication and conversation analysis]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton
1953  Essays in Positive Economics . Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Furman, Nelly, David Goldberg, and Natalia Lusin
2010  Enrollments in Languages Other Than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education . New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Gambardella, Alfonso, Paola Giuri, and Myriam Mariani
2006  Study on Evaluating the Knowledge Economy What Are Patents Actually Worth? The Value of Patents for Today’s Economy and Society. Final Report for Lot 2 . Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Gazzola, Michele
2006a “La gestione del multilinguismo nell’Unione europea [Managing multilingualism in the European Union.” In Le Sfide Della Politica Linguistica Di Oggi: Fra La Valorizzazione Del Multilingualismo Migratorio Locale E Le Istanze Del Plurilinguismo Europeo , ed. by Augusto Carli, 17–117. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
2006b “Managing Multilingualism in the European Union: Language Policy Evaluation for the European Parliament.” Language Policy 5 (4): 393–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a “La valutazione della ricerca e l’internazionalizzazione dell’università: quali effetti sulla diversità linguistica? [The evaluation of reseach activities and the internationalisation of higher education: what effects on linguistic diversity?” Plurilinguismo. Contatti di lingue e culture 15: 43–58.Google Scholar
2010b “Quali lingue per il brevetto dell’Unione europea? Un’analisi economica [Which languages for the EU patent? An economic analysis.” La Crusca per Voi 41: 7–10.Google Scholar
2011  The Economic Evaluation of Efficiency and Fairness in the Management of Multilingual Communication: The Case of Patent Offices , PhD thesis. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar
2012 “The Linguistic Implications of Academic Performance Indicators: General Trends and Case Study.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 216: 131–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and François Grin 2007 “Assessing Efficiency and Fairness in Multilingual Communication: Towards a General Analytical Framework.” AILA [Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée] Review 20: 87–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and François Grin 2013 “Is Elf More Effective and Fair Than Translation? An Evaluation of the Eu’s Multilingual Regime.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 23 (1): 93–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and Alessia Volpe 2013, in press. “Linguistic Justice in Ip Policies: Evaluating the Language Regime of the European Patent Office.” European Journal of Law and Economics . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geva-May, Iris
and Leslie A. Pal 1999 “Good Fences Make Good Neighbours: Policy Evaluation and Policy Analysis — Exploring the Differences.” Evaluation 5 (3): 259–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giedymin, Jerzy
1975 “Antipositivism in Contemporary Philosophy of Social Sciences and Humanities.” The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 26 (4): 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gingras, Yves
2008  La fièvre de l’évaluation de la recherche. Du mauvais usage de faux indicateurs [The fever for the evaluation of reserch activities. On the bad use of wrong indicators]. Note de recherche, 2008–05. Montreal: Interuniversity Research Centre on Science and Technology (CIRST).Google Scholar
Ginsburgh, Victor A., Ignacio Ortuño Ortín, and Shlomo Weber
2007 “Learning Foreign Languages. Theoretical and Empirical Implications of the Selten and Pool Model.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64: 337–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, Victor, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín, and Shlomo Weber
2005 “Disenfranchisement in Linguistically Diverse Societies: The Case of the European Union.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (4): 946–965. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, Victor
and Shlomo Weber 2005 “Language Disenfranchisement in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (2): 273–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorter, Durk, Jasone Cenoz, Paulo Nunes, Patrizia Riganti, Laura Onofri, Barbara Puzzo, and Rajesh Sachdeva
2007 “Benefits of Linguistic Diversity and Multilingualism.” Position paper of Research Task 1.2 - Project “Sustainable Development in a Diverse World (SUS.DIV)” . Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).Google Scholar
Gosseries, Axel, Alain Marciano, and Alain Strowel
(eds) 2008  Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gourdin-Lamblin, Anne-Sophie
2005 “Le brevet communautaire: entre fonctionnement efficace du marché interieur et diversité linguistique [The Community patent. between effective working of the Common Market and linguistic diversity].” Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai - Iurisprudentia (2): 65–77.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1956 “The Measurement of Linguistic Diversity.” Language 32 (1): 109–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grin, François
1992 “Towards a Threshold Theory of Minority Language Survival.” Kyklos 45: 69–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994a “The Economics of Language: Match or Mismatch?” International Political Science Review 15 (1): 25–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994b “L’identification des bénéfices de l’aménagement linguistique: la langue comme actif naturel [Identifying the benefits of language planning: language as a natural asset].” Sociolinguistic Studies and Language Planning - XVI Colloque annuel de l’association de linguistique des provinces atlantiques, Université de Moncton, 67–101.Google Scholar
1996 “The Economics of Language: Survey, Assessment, and Prospects” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121: 17–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Gérer le plurilinguisme européen: Une approche économique au problème de choix [Managing European multilingualism: An economic approach to the problem of choice.” Sociolinguistica 11: 1 - 15.Google Scholar
1999  Compétences et récompenses. La valeur des langues en Suisse [Skills and rewards. The value of languages in Switzerland] . Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires de Fribourg.Google Scholar
2001 “English as an Economic Value: Facts and Fallacies.” World Englishes 20 (1): 65–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003a “Language Planning and Economics.” Current Issues in Language Planning 4 (1): 1–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b  Language Policy Evaluation and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a “L’anglais comme lingua franca: questions de coût et d’équité. Commentaire sur l’article de Philippe Van Parijs [English as a lingua franca: cost and fairness matters. Comment on the article of Philippe Van Parijs.” Économie publique 15 (2): 33–41.Google Scholar
2004b “L’élargissement de l’union européenne: Questions de coût et justice linguistique [The enlargment of the European Union. Cost and linguistic justce matters.” Panoramiques 69: 97–104.Google Scholar
2005  L’enseignement des langues étrangères comme politique publique [Public policy on foreign-language teaching]. 19. Paris: Rapport au Haut Conseil de l’évaluation de l’école.Google Scholar
2010 “Economics.” In Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity (2nd) , ed. by Joshua Fishman and Ofelia García, 70–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and Michele Gazzola 2007 “Efficiency and Fairness.” Working Papers of the DYLAN Project Working Paper N° 1 (Deliverable 4.1): 9–31 www​.dylan​-project​.org.
and Michele Gazzola 2009 “Efficiency and Fairness.” Working Papers of the DYLAN project Working Paper N° 3 (Deliverable 4.3): 8–12 www​.dylan​-project​.org.
and Michele Gazzola 2010a “Criteria-Based Comparison in Language Policy: Principles and Methodology.” Working Papers of the DYLAN project Working Paper N° 5 (Deliverable 1.5): 10–45 www​.dylan​-project​.org.
and Michele Gazzola 2010b “Multilingualism, Efficiency and Fairness: Preliminary Considerations Regarding the Role of Creativity in a Set of Structural Relationships.” Working Papers of the DYLAN project Working Paper N° 4 (Deliverable 4.4) www​.dylan​-project​.org.
and Michele Gazzola 2013, forthcoming. “Assessing Efficiency and Fairness in Multilingual Communication: Theory and Application through Indicators.” In The Dylan Book (Language Dynamics and Management of Diversity) ed. by Anne-Claude Berthoud, François Grin, and Georges Lüdi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
and Borries Kuzmany 2000  Evaluating Policy Measures for Minority Language in Europe: Towards Effective, Cost-Effective and Democratic Implementation . ECMI Report #6. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues.Google Scholar
Grin, François, Tom Moring, Durk Gorter, Johan Häggman, Dónall Ó Riagáin, and Miguel Strubell
2002  Support for Minority Languages in Europe . Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Grin, François, Claudio Sfreddo, and François Vaillancourt
2010  The Economics of the Multilingual Workplace . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grin, François
and François Vaillancourt 1997 “The Economics of Multilingualism: Overview and Analytical Framework.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 17: 43–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and François Vaillancourt 1998  Language Revitalisation Policy: An Analytical Survey. Theoretical Framework, Policy Experience and Application to Te Reo Maori . Treasury Working Paper 98/6. Wellington (NZ) http://​www​.treasury​.govt​.nz​/publications​/research​-policy​/wp​/1998​/98​-06.Google Scholar
and François Vaillancourt 1999  The Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Minority Language Policies: Case Studies on Wales, Ireland and the Basque Country, Ecmi Monograph N. 2. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M.
and Elhanan Helpman 1991  Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy . Cambridge (MA): MIT press.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco
and Matteo Motterlini 2005  Economia cognitiva e sperimentale [Cognitive and experimental economics]. Milan: Università Bocconi Editore.Google Scholar
Guellec, Dominique
and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe 2001 “The Internationalisation of Technology Analysed with Patent Data.” Research Policy 30: 1253–1266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe 2007  The Economics of the European Patent System: Ip Policy for Innovation and Competition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guidère, Mathieu.
2008 “La veille multilingue : Défense et illustration de la traduction stratégique [Multilingual monitoring: Defence and Illustration of strategic translation].” In Traduction Et Veille Stratégique Multilingue , ed. by Mathieu Guidère, 11–51. Paris: Éditions Le Manuscript.Google Scholar
Güth, Werner, Martin Strobel, and Bengt-Arne Wickström
1997 “Equilibrium Selection in Linguistic Games - Kial Ni (Ne) Parolas Esperanton?” In Understanding Strategic Interaction - Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten , ed. by Wulf Albers, Werner Güth, Peter Hammerstein, and Benny Moldovanu, 257–269. Heidelberg – New York - Tokyo: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Nick
and Clive L. Spash 1993  Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment . Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Harhoff, Dietmar
2009  Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Unified Integrated European Patent Litigation System . München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.Google Scholar
Harhoff, Dietmar, Karin Hoisl, Bettina Reichl, and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe
2009 “Patent Validation at the Country Level - the Role of Fees and Translation Costs.” Research Policy 38: 1423–1437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harhoff, Dietmar, Karin Hoisl, and Bruno Van Pottelsberghe
2009 “Languages, Fees and the International Scope of Patenting.” Discussion paper 2009–06 . Munich: Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard G.
1998 “The Economics of Language in a Virtually Integrated Global World.” In Economic Approaches to Language and Bilingualism ed. by Albert Breton, 35–88. Ottawa: Canadian Heritage Series.Google Scholar
Hjorth-Andersen, Christian
2006 “The Relative Importance of the European Languages.” Discussion Papers (06–23). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H.
2006 “Frameworks and Models in Language Policy and Planning” In An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Methods , ed. by 24–41. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Houbert, Frédéric
2002 “Les brevets d’invention et leur traduction [Patents and their translation.” Traduire (193): 47–58.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
and Jochen Rehbein 2004 “What Is “Multilingual Communication”?” In Multilingual Communication , ed. by Juliane House and Jochen Rehbein, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
ISTAT
2002  Letture e linguaggio [Readings and language]. Indagine Multiscopo sulle famiglie “I cittadini e il tempo libero” - Anno 2000. Rome: Istituto Italiano di Statistica (ISTAT).Google Scholar
Ivanyna, Maksym
2007 “Multilingual Societies, Benevolent Governments and Dying Languages.” Paper presented at the Doctoral school “Economic Analysis of Heterogeneity in Social Organizations” , Université Catholoque de Louvain, 4–7 June. https://​www​.msu​.edu​/~ivanynam​/research​/mulling​/Ivanyna​_mul​_ling​_2007​.pdf
Ives, Peter
2006 “ ‘Global English’: Linguistic Imperialism or Practical Lingua Franca?” Studies in Language and Capitalism 1: 121–141.Google Scholar
2007 “Cosmopolitan Anxieties and the Role of the State in Linguistic Hegemony.” Paper presented at the 3rd International Gramsci Society Conference , Ghilarza, Oristano, 5 May 2007 http://​www​.gramscitalia​.it​/html​/ives​.pdf
Jaffe, Adam B., Michael S. Fogarty, and Bruce A. Banks
1998 “Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation.” Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (183–205). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaime, Laura, Xavier Mitjà, and Joan Solé Camardons
1995 “Objectius i indicadors de resultat: exemples de formulació [Objectives and Results Indicators: Examples of formulation].” Llengua i Ús - Revista tècnica de Política Lingüística (2): 15–20.Google Scholar
Jernudd, Björn H.
1971 “Notes on Economic Analysis for Solving Language Problems.” In Can Language Be Planned? , ed. by Joan Rubin and Björn H. Jernudd, 263–276. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Jernudd, Björn
and Jiří Nekvapil 2012 “History of the Field: A Sketch.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy , ed. by Bernard Spolsky, 16–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, John H.
2005 “The Economics of Patent Policy: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.” In Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property Policy, Litigation, and Management , ed. by Gregory K. Leonard and Lauren J. Stiroh. White Plains (NY): NERA Economic Consulting.Google Scholar
Johnson, Marc L.
and Paule Doucet 2006  A Sharper View: Evaluating the Vitality of Official Language Communities . Ottawa: Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada.Google Scholar
Jullion, Marie-Christine
(ed) 2005  Linguistica e proprietà intellettuale [Linguistics and intellectual property]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Jung, Sook Kyung
and Bonny Norton 2002 “Language Planning in Korea: The New Elementary English Program.” In Language Policies in Education. Critical Issues , ed. by James W. Tollefson, 245–266. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Just, Richard E., Darrell L. Hueth, and Andrew Schmitz
2004  The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B.
and Richard B. Baldauf 1997  Language Planning. From Practice to Theory . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994  On Language Change. The Invisible Hand in Language . London - New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempton, R. A.
1979 “The Structure of Species Abundance and Measurement of Diversity.” Biometrics 35 (1): 307–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Peter
and Ian King 2005 “Dynamic Language Policy.” Paper presented at the Canadian Macroeconomics Study Group meetings , Vancouver, 4–5 November. http://​www​.business​.otago​.ac​.nz​/econ​/Personal​/ik​_files​/dynamic​_language​_policy​_05​.pdf
KIPO
2010  Four Office Statistic Report 2009 Edition . Dae-jeon: Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).Google Scholar
Knoepfel, Peter, Corinne Larrue, Frédéric Varone, and Michael Hill
2007  Public Policy Analysis . Bristol: The Policy Press. [Original: Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques (2nd ed.), Geneva-Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 2006.].Google Scholar
Konow, James
1996 “A Positive Theory of Economic Fairness.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation 31: 13–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kudryavtsev, Eduard
and Louis-Dominique Ouedraogo 2003  Implementation of Multilingualism in the United Nations System . Geneva: Joint Inspection Unit.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will
2002  Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and Alan Patten (eds) 2003  Language Rights and Political Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David
1993 “The Game Theory of Language Regimes.” International Political Science Review 14 (3): 227–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “What Is a Language Community?” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 142–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamizet, Bernard
and Ahmed Silem 1997  Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences de l’information et de la communication [The Encyclopedia of information and communication sciences]. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
Latouche, Serge
2006  Le pari de la décroissance [Farewell to Growth]. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Layard, Richard
and Stephen Glaister 1996  Cost-Benefit Analysis (2nd). Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F.
1958 “Evidence and Inference in Social Research.” Deadalus 87 (4): 89–109.Google Scholar
Levin, Henry M.
and Patrick J. MacEwan 2001  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley
1964 “An Extension of Greenberg’s Linguistic Diversity Measure.” Language 40 (4): 526–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, Stan E.
and Stephen E. Margolis 1994 “Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2): 133–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lo Piparo, Franco
1979  Lingua, intellettuali, egemonia in Gramsci [Language, intellectuals, hegemony in Gramsci]. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Lüdi, Georges
(ed) 2010  Le plurilinguisme au travail entre la philosophie de l’entreprise, les représentations des acteurs et les pratiques quotidiennes [Multilingualism in the workplace between business principles, actors’ representations and everyday practices (Acta Romanica Basiliensia, Vol. 22). Basel: Universität Basel.Google Scholar
Luke, Allan
and Richard B. Baldauf 1990 “Language Planning and Education: A Critical Rereading.” In Language Planning and Education in Australasia and the South Pacific , ed. by Allan Luke and Richard B. Baldauf, 349–356. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marsh, David
and Richard Hill 2009  Study on the Contribution of Multilingualism to Creativity . Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael D. Whinston, and Jerry R. Green
1995  Microeconomic Theory . New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maurseth, Per Botolf
and Bart Verspagen 2002 “Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citation Analysis.” Scandinavian journal of economics 104 (4): 531–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Thomas
1993 “Friedman’s Methodology of Positive Economics: A Soft Reading.” Economic Inquiry 31: 213–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Robert C.
and Richard T. Carson 1989  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method . Washington (DC): Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, Vassiliki Markaki, Sara Merlino, Florence Oloff, and Véronique Traverso
2013 forthcoming. “Multilingual practices in professional settings: Keeping the delicate balance between progressivity and intersubjectivity.” In The Dylan Book (Language Dynamics and Management of Diversity) ed. by Anne-Claude Berthoud, François Grin, and Georges Lüdi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moretti, Bruno, Elena Maria Pandolfi, and Matteo Casoni
2011 “Introduzione [Introduction].” In Vitalità Di Una Lingua Minoritaria. Aspetti E Proposte Metodologiche/ Vitality of a Minority Language. Aspects and Methodological Issues , ed. by Bruno Moretti, Elena Maria Pandolfi, and Matteo Casoni, 7–25. Bellinzona: Osservatorio Linguistico della Svizzera Italiana.Google Scholar
Moulin, Hervé
2003  Fair Division and Collective Welfare . Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C.
2003  Public Choice Iii . Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter.
2000 “Language Planning and Language Ecology.” Current Issues in Language Planning 3: 306–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter
and Richard Damania 2004 “Economic Costs and Benefits of Australian Indigenous Languages” Discussion Paper Prepared for Australian Government Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services (ATSIS), University of Adelaide.
Muri Petit, Rosa
1999 “Indicadors d’ús del català en la documentació local 1998 [Indicators of use of Catalan in the local documentation, 1998].” Llengua i Ús - Revista tècnica de Política Lingüística (16): 37–45.Google Scholar
Murray, Fiona
and Scott Stern 2007 “Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63: 648–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, Gareth D.
1995  Public Economics . Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Navrud, Ståle
and Richard C. Ready 2002  Valuing Cultural Heritage. Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artefacts . Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Nehring, Klaus
and Clemens Puppe 2002 “A Theory of Diversity.” Econometrica 70 (3): 1155–1198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, Jiří
2012 “From Language Planning to Language Management: J. V. Neustupný’s Heritage.” メディア・コミュニケーション研究 (Media and Communication Studies) 63: 5–21.Google Scholar
Neustupný, Jiří.
1983 “Towards a Paradigm for Language Planning.” Language Planning Newsletter 9 (4): 1–4.Google Scholar
OECD
1996  The Knowledge-Based Economy Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
2008  Education at a Glance 2008 . OECD Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor
1992  Governing the Commons : The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palumbo, Mauro
2001 “Valutazione di processo e d’impatto: l’uso degli indicatori tra meccanismi ed effetti [Process and impact evaluation: the use of indicators between mechanisms and effects].” In Valutazione 2001. Lo Sviluppo Della Valutazione in Italia , ed. by Nicoletta Stame, 328–360. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
2003 “Gli indicatori valutativi [Evaluative indicators].” Rassegna italiana di valutazione 7 (27): 107–129.Google Scholar
2010 “Definizioni, approcci e usi degli indicatori nella ricerca e nella valutazione [Definitions, approches and uses of indicators in research and evaluation.” In Gli Indicatori Sociali E Il Loro Uso Valutativo , ed. by Claudio Bezzi, Leonardo Cannavò, and Mauro Palumbo, 19–41. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Patil, G. P.
and C. Taillie 1982 “Diversity as a Concept and Its Measurement.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77 (379): 548–561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patrinos, Harry Anthony
and Eduardo Velez 1995  Costs and Benefits of Bilingual Education in Guatemala . HCO Dissemination Notes. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Paulré, Bernard.
1993 “L’organisation entre information et communication [Organisation between information and communication.” In Dictionnaire Critique De La Communication , ed. by Lucien Sfez, 519–568. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Perkins, Frances
1994 “Practical Cost-Benefit Analysis.” ed. by MacMillan. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Peled, Yael
2011 “Language rights and the language of language rights.The need for a new conceptual framework in the political theory of language policy.” Journal of Language and Politics 10 (3): 436–456.Google Scholar
Perret, Bernard
2002 “Indicateurs sociaux. État de lieux et perspectives [Social indicators. State of the art and perspectives.” Les Papiers du CERC 2002–01 . Paris: Conseil de l’emploi, des revenus et de la cohésion sociale.Google Scholar
Perrin, Burt
1998 “Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement.” The American Journal of Evaluation 19 (3): 367–379.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Robert
1992  Linguistic Imperialism . Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Picci, Lucio
2010 “The Internationalization of Inventive Activity: A Gravity Model Using Patent Data.” Research Policy 39: 1070–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pingali, Sailaja
2009  Indian English . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Jonathan
1980 “The Economics of Artificial Languages: An Exploration in Cost Minimization.” Paper presented at the Fachtagung Angewandte Soziolinguistik , Universität Paderborn, 19–20 June. utilika​.org​/pubs​/etc​/eal​.pdf
1987 “Thinking About Linguistic Discrimination.” Language Problems & Language Planning 11 (1): 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991a “The Official Language Problem.” American Political Science Review 25 (2): 485 – 514.Google Scholar
1991b “The World Language Problem.” Rationality and Society 3 (1): 78–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Jonathan.
1996 “Optimal Language Regimes for the European Union.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121: 159 – 179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Jonathan
and Brian McFann 1992 “The Language Auction: A Nondiscriminatory Method of Choosing Official Languages.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Linguistic Human Rights , Tallin, Estonia, 12–16 October 1991 http://​utilika​.org​/pubs​/etc​/auction​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Prioux, René
and Michel Rochard 2007 “Économie de la révision dans une organisation internationale : le cas de L’OCDE [The economics of editing in a international organisation: The case of OECD.” The Journal of Specialised Translation (8): 21–41.Google Scholar
Rawls, John.
1971  A Theory of Justice . Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo.
1981  La politica linguistica della rivoluzione francese. Studio sulle origini e la natura del giacobinismo linguistico [The language policy of the French revolution. Study on the origin and nature of linguistic jacobinisme]. Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar
Ricento, Thomas.
2006 “Language Policy: Theory and Practice - an Introduction.” In An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Method , ed. by 10–23. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roland Berger.
2004  Study on the Cost of Patenting . Munich: Roland Berger Market Resarch.Google Scholar
Rosen, Harvey S.
2004  Public Finance (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., Mark W. Lipsey, and Howard E. Freeman
2004  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rubin, Joan.
1971 “Evaluation and Language Planning.” In Can Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations , ed. by Joan Rubin and Björn H. Jernudd, 217–252. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Rubin, Joan
and Björn H. Jernudd (eds) 1971a  Can Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations . Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
and Björn H. Jernudd 1971b “Introduction: Language Planning as an Element in Modernisation.” In Can Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations , ed. by Joan Rubin and Björn H. Jernudd, xiii–xxiv. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd.
2004  Global Collective Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007  Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, Harold F.
1996  Linguistic Culture and Language Policy . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006 “Language Policy and Linguistic Culture.” In An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Methods , ed. by Thomas Ricento, 111–125. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Screpanti, Ernesto
and Stefano Zamagni 1995  An Outline of the History of Economic Thought . Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Original: Profili di storia del pensiero economico (2nd ed.) 1992 Rome: Carocci]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Secretaria de Política Lingüística
2009  Informe de política lingüística 2008 [Language policy report 2008]. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, Danica, Barbara Moser, Jean Klein, and Marianne Lederer
2000  Conséquences de l’élargissement de l’union européenne sur le fonctionnement de l’interprétation [Consequences of the enlargement of the European Union on the operation of interpreting]. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Selten, Reinhard
and Jonathan Pool 1991 “The Distribution of Foreign Language Skills as a Game Equilibrium.” In Game Equilibrium Models, Vol. 4, Social and Political Interaction , ed. by Reinhard Selten, 64–87. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K.
1999 “The Possibility of Social Choice.” The American Economic Review 89 (3): 349–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seville, Catherine
(ed) 2009  EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana.
2006  Language Policy. Hidden Agendas and New Approaches . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simó, Montse, Joan Solé i Comardons, and Anna Torrijos
2006 “Aproximació a L’avaluació De La Campanya ‘Dóna Corda Al Català’ [Approach to evaluation of the campaign ‘Dóna Corda Al Català’].” Llengua i Ús - Revista tècnica de Política Lingüística (35): 26–32.Google Scholar
Solé Camardons, Joan.
2003 “El sistema d’indicadors lingüístics (Sil) [The system of linguistic indicators].” Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüística 4 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Solé Camardons, Joan
and Anna Torrijos 2008 “El sistema d’indicadors lingüístics a Catalunya [The Catalan system of linguistic indicators].” Llengua i Ús - Revista tècnica de Política Lingüística (43): 92–103.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung.
2011 “English as an Official Language in South Korea. Global English or Social Malady?” Language Problems & Language Planning 35 (1): 35–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard.
2004  Language Policy . Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2009  Language Management . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “What Is Language Policy?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy , ed. by Bernard Spolsky, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stame, Nicoletta.
2001 “Tre approcci principali alla valutazione: distinguere e combinare [Three approaches to evaluation: distinguishing and combining].” In Il Processo Di Valutazione. Decidere, Programmare, Valutare , ed. by Mauro Palumbo, 21–46. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph.
2007 “Knowledge as a Global Public Good.” In International Intellectual Property in an Integrated World Economy , ed. by Frederick M. Abbott, Thomas Cottier, and Francis Gurry. The Hague: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stirling, Andy.
2007 “A General Framework for Analyzing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4: 707–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles L.
and David A. Jodice 1983  World Handbook of Poolitical and Social Indicators (3rd) (2 volumes). New Heaven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorburn, Thomas.
1971 “Cost-Benefit Analysis in Language Planning.” In Can Language Be Planned? , ed. by Joan Rubin and Björn H. Jernudd, 253–262. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Tollefson, James W.
2006 “Critical Theory in Language Policy.” In An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Methods , ed. by Thomas Ricento, 42–59. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 “Language Planning in Education.” In Language Policy and Political Issues in Education , ed. by Stephen May and Nancy H. Hornberger, 3–14. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tritton, Guy
and Richard Davis (eds) 2008  Intellectual Property in Europe . London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
UNESCO
2003  Language Vitality and Endangerment . UNESCO ad hoc expert group on endangered languages. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, François.
1978 “La charte de la langue française au Québec: un essai d’analyse [The Charter of the French Language in Quebec: An analysis.” Canadian Public Policy/ Analyse de Politiques 4: 284–308.Google Scholar
1983 “The Economics of Language and Language Planning.” Language Problems & Language Planning 2 (7): 162–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, François
(ed) 1985a  Économie et langues [Economics and languages]. Québec: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, François.
1985b. “Les écrits en économie de la langue : brève revue et introduction au recueil [Writings in language economics: short overview and introduction].” In Économie Et Langues , ed. by François Vaillancourt, 11–25. Québec: Conseil de la langue française.
1987 “The Costs and Benefits of Language Policies in Quebec, 1974–1984: Some Partial Estimates.” In The Economics of Language Use , ed. by Humphrey Tonkin and Karen M. Johnson-Weiner, 71–94. New York: Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems.Google Scholar
1995 “Economic Costs and Benefits of the Official Languages: Some Observations.” In Official Languages and the Economy. New Canadian Perspectives , ed. by Department of Canadian Heritage, 103–118. Ottawa: Canadian Heritage Series.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, François
and Olivier Coche 2009  Les politiques fédérales en matière de langues officielles au Canada : coûts et Avantages en 2006 [Official Language Policies at the Federal Level in Canada: Costs and Benefits in 2006]. Études en politique linguistique. Vancouver: Institut Fraser.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe.
2002 “Linguistic Justice.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics (1): 59–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a “Europe’s Linguistic Challenge.” Archives européennes de sociologie 45 (1): 113–154.Google Scholar
2004b “L’anglais comme lingua franca de l’Union européenne: impératif de solidarité, source d’injustice, facteur de déclin? [English as a lingua franca of the European Union: solidarity imperative, source of injustice, cause of decline?” Économie publique 15 (2): 13–32.Google Scholar
2007 “Takling the Anglophones’ Free Ride: Fair Linguistic Cooperation with a Global Lingua Franca.” AILA [Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée] Review 20: 72–86.Google Scholar
2008 “Linguistic Diversity as Curse and as by-Product” In Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union , ed. by Xabier Arzoz. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2011  Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Pottelsberghe, Bruno
and Didier François 2009 “The Cost Factor in Patent Systems.” Journal of Industry Competition and Trade 9: 329–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and Malwina Mejer 2010 “The London Agreement and the Cost of Patenting in Europe.” European Journal of Law and Economics 29: 211–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, and Dominique Guellec
2009 “Claiming More: The Increased Voluminosity of Patent Applications and Its Determinants.” Research Policy 38: 1006–1020. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varian, Hal R.
2003  Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (6th ed.). New York ; London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Vedung, Evert.
2000  Public Policy and Program Evaluation . New Brunswick (USA): Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Vianès, George.
2001  Brevet européen: les enjeux de l’Accord de Londres [The European patent: The challange of the London Agreement]. Paris: Secrétariat d’Etat à l’Industrie.Google Scholar
Volpe, Alessia.
2011  Language Policy Evaluation for the European Union Patent System: Looking for a New Strategy , Master dissertation. University of Geneva: Geneva.Google Scholar
Wächter, Bernd
and Friedhelm Maiworm 2008  English-Taught Programmes in European Higher Education. The Picture in 2007 . Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
Weber, Shlomo, Jean J. Gabszewicz, and Victor A. Ginsburgh
2008 “Bilingualism and Communicative Benefits.” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper No. 17 .
Wee, Lionel.
2003 “Linguistic Instrumentalism in Singapore.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 (3): 211–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weimer, David L.
and Aidan R. Vining 2005  Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Weiss, Pia.
2010  Patent Policy: Legal-Economic Effects in a National and International Framework . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L.
1992 “On Diversity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 363–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickström, Bengt-Arne.
1997 “What Are the Cost and Benefits of the Use of a Language?” In The Cost of European Linguistic (Non)Communication , ed. by Reinhard Selten, 5–13 [English translation of “Kio estas kostoj kaj utilo de lingvouzo?” in Selten, R. La kostoj de la eŭropa lingva (ne-)kommunikado . Rome: “Esperanto” radikala asocio (1997) 1995–1913]. Rome: “Esperanto” radikala asocio.Google Scholar
2005 “Can Bilingualism Be Dynamically Stable? A Simple Model of Language Choice.” Rationality and Society 17: 81–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Fairness, Rights, and Language Rights: On the Fair Treatement of Linguistic Minorities.” In Public Economics and Public Choice. Contributions in Honor of Charles B. Blankart , ed. by Pio Baake and Rainald Borck, 81–102. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Welfare-Optimal Status Planning: An Economic Approach.” Manuscript . Berlin: Institut für Finanzwissenschaft Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
2013 “The Optimal Babel: An Economic Framework for the Analysis of Dynamic Language Rights.” In Constitutional Economics and Public Institutions: Essays in Honour of José Casas-Pardo , ed. by F. Cabrillo and M. Puchades Navarro, 322–344. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glyn.
2010  The Knowledge Economy, Languages and Culture . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
WIPO
2004  Wipo Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2005  Addition of Arabic as a Language of Publication . PCT Union. Working Group on Reform of The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Seventh Session, Geneva, May 25 to 31 2005 PCT/R/WG/7/10. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2006  Progress Report on the Follow up of the Joint Inspection Unit’s Recommendations as Contained in Its Report “Review of Management and Administration in Wipo: Budget, Oversight and Related Issues” . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2007a  Addition of Korean as a Language of Publication . PCT Union. Assembly, Thirty-Sixth (16th Ordinary) Session Geneva, September 24 to October 3 2007 PCT/A/36/8. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
2007b  Addition of Portuguese as a Language of Publication . PCT Union. Assembly, Thirty-Sixth (16th Ordinary) Session Geneva, September 24 to October 3 2007 PCT/A/36/9. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
2007c  Flexibility Formula for Administration of the Pct . PCT/A/36/5. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.Google Scholar
2008a  Criteria for Addition of Languages of Publication under the Pct. International Patent Cooperation Union (Pct Union) Patent Cooperation Treaty. Working Group, First Session Geneva, May 26 to 30, 2008 . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.Google Scholar
2008b  World Patent Report. A Statistical Review . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2009a  Pct Receiving Office Guidelines (Guidelines for the Processing by Receiving Offices of International Applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty) . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2009b  The Pct System for Worldwide Filing of Patent Applications . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2009c  Program and Budget for the 2010/2011 Biennium . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2010a  Pct Yearly Review: The International Patent System in 2009 . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2010b  Policy on Languages at Wipo . Geneva: Program and Budget Committee, World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2010c  Program Performance Report for 2008/2009 . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2010d  Seminar Presentation on the Patent Cooperation Treaty (Pct) . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2010e  World Intellectual Property Indicators . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2011a  Administrative Instructions under the Pct . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2011b  Pct Applicant’s Guide – International Phase . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2011c  Wipo Guide to Use Patent Information . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2012a  Financial Management Report 2010–2011 . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2012b  Pct Yearly Review . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2013a  Pct Yearly Review . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
2013b  World Intellectual Property Indicators . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth.
2006 “Linguistic Analyses in Language Policies.” In An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Methods , ed. by Thomas Ricento, 170–193. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds) 2008  Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
and Michael Meyer (eds) 2009  Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis . London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
World Bank
2004  Monitoring & Evaluation: Some Tools, Methods and Approaches . Washington (DC): The World Bank.Google Scholar
Wright, Sue.
2004  Language Policy and Language Planning. From Nationalism to Globalisation . Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Zajac, Edward E.
1995  Political Economy of Fairness . Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zajczyk, Francesca.
1997  Il mondo degli indicatori sociali [The world of social indicators]. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2015. Publications Received. Language in Society 44:2 ► pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2016.  In Managing Plurilingual and Intercultural Practices in the Workplace [Multilingualism and Diversity Management, 4], Crossref logo
Carbonara, Valentina & Andrea Scibetta
2020. Integrating translanguaging pedagogy into Italian primary schools: implications for language practices and children's empowerment. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Chibaka, Evelyn Fogwe
2018.  In Multilingualism and Bilingualism, Crossref logo
Costa-Carreras, Joan
2020. Are terminology planning evaluation and language policy and planning evaluation applicable to the evaluation of standardisation?. Current Issues in Language Planning 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, Crossref logo
du Plessis, Theodorus
2017. Language Policy Evaluation and Review at the University of the Free State. Language Matters 48:3 ► pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Fairbrother, Lisa & Goro Christoph Kimura
2020.  In A Language Management Approach to Language Problems [Studies in World Language Problems, 7], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gazzola, Michele, François Grin & François Vaillancourt
2020.  In Bridging Linguistics and Economics, ► pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Grin, François
2016.  In Language Policy and Political Issues in Education, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kimura, Goro Christoph
2020.  In A Language Management Approach to Language Problems [Studies in World Language Problems, 7], ► pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Riera-Gil, Elvira
2019. The communicative value of local languages: An underestimated interest in theories of linguistic justice. Ethnicities 19:1 ► pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Royles, Elin & Huw Lewis
2019. Language policy in multi-level systems: A historical institutionalist analysis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21:4 ► pp. 709 ff. Crossref logo
Templin, Torsten
2020. Language competition modeling and language policy evaluation. Language Problems and Language Planning 44:1 ► pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Vermandere, Dieter, Lieve Vangehuchten & Rebecca Van Herck
2019. Language policy evaluation in business settings. European Journal of Language Policy 11:1 ► pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Linguistics

Language policy
Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
Bilingualism
Applied linguistics

Miscellaneous

Industrial & organizational studies

Sociology

Sociology

Translation & Interpreting Studies

Translation Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014003234 | Marc record