Article published in:
Mediation Strategies
Edited by Anthony Pym
[Language Problems and Language Planning 42:3] 2018
► pp. 267–287

Language choices and practices of migrants in Germany

An interview study

| University of Leipzig
| University of Leipzig
The language uses of twenty migrants in Germany who have English in their language repertoires are investigated through semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis. The findings suggest that in occupation-related situations and daily life, these migrants resort to English in situations that are too difficult to handle in German. For most of them this is only temporary, before they have a sufficient command of German. Whether and how well migrants learn German depends on factors such as the planned length of stay, the demand for the language in their professional field, previous migration experiences, and personality. Most of the interviewees had taken language classes and were highly motivated to learn German, as English is not always a viable option for communication in Germany and because they considered proficiency in German a sign of respect. The use of German and English as a lingua franca were the two major mediation strategies, along with language technologies like Google Translate, while some interviewees reported successful use of intercomprehension.
Keywords: migration, German, English as a lingua franca, German, tertiary language didactics, language technology, intercomprehension
Published online: 28 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00023.fie
References

References

Adserà, Alícia & Mariola Pytliková
2015 The role of language in shaping international migration. The Economic Journal 125/586, F49–F81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bleakley, Hoyt & Aimee Chin
2004 Language skills and earnings: Evidence from childhood immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics 84/2, 481–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley & Christiane Meierkord
2013 English in contemporary Sweden: Perceptions, policies, and narrated practices. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17/1, 93–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt
2002 Semicommunication and accommodation. Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12/1, 1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Codó, Eva
2008 Interviews and Questionnaires. Li Wei & Melissa G. Moyer, eds. The Blackwell Guide to research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. 158–176.Google Scholar
Dustmann, Christian & Francesca Fabbri
2003 Language proficiency and labour market performance of immigrants in the UK. Economic Journal 113(489), 695–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
European Commission
2012 Intercomprehension: Exploring its Usefulness for DGT, the Commission and the EU. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
Firth, Allen
1996 The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 237–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Föbker, Stefanie
2016 Translocal life and integration of highly-skilled migrants in Germany. Erdkunde 70/2, 109–124.Google Scholar
Grigoleit, Grit
2010 Making a career? The integration of highly skilled female migrants into the German job market. Paper for the APPAM International Conference Migration: A World in Motion A Multinational Conference on Migration and Migration Policy , Maastricht, February 18–20, 2010.
Henry, Alastair
2016a Swedish or English? Migrants’ experiences of the exchangeability of language resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19/4, 443–463.Google Scholar
2016b Enablements and constraints: Inventorying affordances associated with lingua franca English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19/5, 488–510.Google Scholar
Heß, Barbara
2009 Zuwanderung von Hochqualifizierten aus Drittstaaten nach Deutschland. Working Paper der Forschungsgruppe des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge 28, at https://​goo​.gl​/LFkwH8 (February 13 2018)
[ p. 285 ]
Mayring, Philipp
2002 Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim; Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
Nowicka, Magdalena
2006 Feste Beziehung oder one-night stand? Hochmobile und ihre Bindung zu Orten. Florian Kreutzer & Silke Roth, eds. Transnationale Karrieren: Biographien, Lebensführung und Mobilität, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 190–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ożańska-Ponikwia, Katarzyna & Jean-Marc Dewaele
2012 Personality and L2 use: The advantage of being openminded and self-confident in an immigration context. EUROSLA Yearbook 12. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 112–134.Google Scholar
Pries, Ludger
2015 Teilhabe an der Migrationsgesellschaft – Zwischen Assimilation und Abschaffung des Integrationsbegriffes. IMIS-Beiträge 47: 7–35.Google Scholar
Riedel, Christine
2004 Im Kampf um Zugehörigkeit und Anerkennung. Orientierungen und Handlungsformen von jungen Migrantinnen. Eine sozio-biografische Untersuchung. Frankfurt am Main & London: IKO-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rinke, Berit & Vogel, Dita
2007 Sprache als der Schlüssel zur Integration? Analysen auf der Basis der POLITIS-Interviewstudie mit gesellschaftlich engagierten Zugewanderten. Ausarbeitung für die Tagung MIGREMUS, Bremen 16.-17.11.2007.Google Scholar
Schreier, Margrit
2012 Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Statista
2014 Deutsche Bevölkerung nach Einschätzung zu den eigenen Englischkenntnissen von 2007 bis 2013 (in Millionen), at https://​goo​.gl​/KcgXXq (February 13 2018).
Thomas, David R.
2006 A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27/2: 237–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar