Article published in:
Mediation Strategies
Edited by Anthony Pym
[Language Problems and Language Planning 42:3] 2018
► pp. 255–266

Introduction

Why mediation strategies are important

| Universitat Rovira i Virgili | The University of Melbourne
Mediation strategies are deployed when people use translation, interpreting, lingua francas, intercomprehension, language learning, or any combination of these to communicate in situations where there is more than one language in play. Such choices can be seen as enacting trade-offs between the goals of mobility (across geolinguistic borders) and inclusion (primarily into labor markets and government services). Mediation strategies are nevertheless selected in accordance with complex sets of criteria by which they are evaluated and compared in each particular situation. Case studies suggest that, if seen as performative language policy, the strategies tend to give more priority to social inclusion than to language diversity. They might thus constitute a challenge to some approaches to official language policy.
Keywords: mediation strategies, language policy, social inclusion, translation policy
Published online: 28 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00022.pym
References

References

Beerkens, Roos
2010 Receptive Multilingualism as a Language Mode in the Dutch-German Area. Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Börestam, Ulla
2015 Excuse me, but can you tell me where the Nordic House is located? Linguistic strategies in inter-Nordic communication in Iceland illustrated through participant observation. Linguistics. 53(2): 219–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt
2002 Semicommunication and accommodation. Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12/1, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Sara A.
2001 Do interpreters translate? Results of an e-mail survey of AIIC members to determine if interpreters also work as translators. Consortium for Training Translation Teachers, at https://​goo​.gl​/2XPiis (4 January 2018).
Eco, Umberto
1993 La ricerca della lingua perfetta nella cultura europea. Rome, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Sabine & Cyril Brosch
2018 Esperanto – a lingua franca in use: A case study on an educational NGO. Language Problems and Language Planning 42/2.Google Scholar
Grin, François
2002 L’économie de la langue et de l’éducation dans la politique de l’enseignement des langues. Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe.Google Scholar
González Núñez, Gabriel
2015 Translating for linguistic minorities. Language policy in the United Kingdom. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven & Universitat Rovira i Virgili, at https://​goo​.gl​/GHd2RV (4 January 2018).
[ p. 265 ]
Grin, François, László Marácz, Nike K. Pokorn & Peter A. Kraus
2014 Mobility and inclusion in multilingual Europe: A position paper on the MIME project. Paper presented at the MIME Kick-Off Conference, University of Geneva, 31 March 2014, at http://​goo​.gl​/8lpoRa (4 January 2018).
Habermas, Jürgen
1995 Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92/3:109–131.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
1992 Le Souffle de la langue. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra
2011 Public Service Interpreting. Malmkjaer, Kirsten & Kevin Windle eds. The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 343–356.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, Joe
2002 Real world language politics and policy. Steven J. Baker ed. Language policy: Lessons from global models. Monterey: Monterey Institute for International Studies. 8–27.Google Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine
2011 Translational justice in a multilingual world: an overview of translational regimes. Meta 56/4:743–757.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pokorn, Nike & Jaka Čibej
2018 Interpreting and linguistic inclusion – friends or foes? Results from a field study. The Translator, 24/2, at https://​goo​.gl​/ysMGa5 (4 January 2018).