Chapter published in:
Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched pedagogy
Edited by Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno and Hae In Park
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 49] 2018
► pp. 291–311

Examining multifaceted sources of input

Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2 classroom

| Indiana University
| Indiana University
| Indiana University
| Grand Valley State University
| Texas Tech University
| Indiana University
| The State University of New York at Albany
Input is a central, driving component in nearly all theories of second language acquisition, but little is known about the relationship between the instructor-provided input to which classroom second language learners are exposed and attested patterns of acquisition. Our study investigates this relationship through an examination of instructors’ Spanish subject expression in oral and written classroom input, as well as their subject expression during three sociolinguistic tasks. Our analysis of five native-speaking instructors’ subject expression, a variable structure, revealed several common patterns across input modes, such as the distribution of the three most common subject forms, as well as subtle differences in the factors constraining use across input modes and tasks. Findings are discussed in relationship to what is known about the acquisition of Spanish subject forms by second language learners, and implications and areas for future research are outlined.  
Published online: 13 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.13gur
References

References

Abreu, L.
(2009) Spanish subject personal pronoun use by monolinguals, bilinguals and second language learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. M.
(2008) Introducción a la lingüística española. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14(3), 261–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, R.
(1993) Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change, 5(3), 305–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R., & Flores-Ferrán, N.
(2004) Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1, 41–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A., Orozco, R., & Shin, N.
(2015) Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(Ed.) (1980) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V.
(2009) First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S.
(2011) Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R.
(1985) Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(3), 289–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(Eds.) (2009) Language as a complex adaptive system. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gaies, S. J.
(1979) Linguistic input in first and second language learning. In F. Eckman & A. Hastings (Eds.), Studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 185–193). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A.
(2010) An exploration of the range and frequency of occurrence of forms in potentially-variable structures in second language Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 433–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Gudmestad, A.
(2016) Subject expression in Spanish: Contrast between native and non-native speakers for first and second-person singular referents. Spanish in Context, 13(1), 53–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., & Fafulas, S.
(2015) Variable subject expression in second language Spanish: Uncovering the developmental sequence and predictive linguistic factors. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. L. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., Fafulas, S., Long, A. Y., & Díaz-Campos, M.
(2013) The L2 development of subject form variation in Spanish: The individual vs. the group. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. Elana Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 156–174). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
(2001) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta‐analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A., House, L., & Geeslin, K.
(2013) What a Bayesian analysis can do for the sociolinguistic study of subject expression in second-language Spanish. Language Learning, 63(1), 371–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, B.
(2008) Second language phonology in optimality theory. In J. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 117–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heining-Boynton, A. L., LeLoup, J. W., & Cowell, G. S.
(2012) ¡Anda! Curso intermedio. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D.
(1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N.
(1996) Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2425–2438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Little, D., Devitt, S., & Singleton, D.
(1994) The communicative approach and authentic texts. In A. Swarbrick (Ed.), Teaching modern languages (pp. 43–47). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lubbers Quesada, M.
(2015) The L2 acquisition of Spanish subjects: Multiple perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norton Peirce, B.
(1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S. Y.
(2001) Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C.
(2012) Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T. L., & Liskin-Gasparro, J.
(2014) We have moved on: Current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 601–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
(2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E.
(2007) Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19, 101–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Lee, J. F., Ballman, T. L., & Farley, A. P.
(2010) Vistazos: Un curso breve. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (2015) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S.
(1994) The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], Crossref logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2020.  In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Travis Evans-Sago
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L., Aarnes Gudmestad, Matthew Kanwit, Bret Linford, Avizia Yim Long, Lauren Schmidt & Megan Solon
2018.  In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2017.  In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2020.  In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2020.  In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 248 ff. Crossref logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, Kimberly L. Geeslin, Avizia Yim Long & Danielle Daidone
2017.  In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 226 ff. Crossref logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura & Luke Plonsky
2017.  In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 306 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Avizia Yim & Kimberly L. Geeslin
2020.  In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 160 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.