Second-language Discourse in the Digital World

Linguistic and social practices in and beyond the networked classroom

| San Francisco State University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027213341 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027213358 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027266705 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
 
Second-language Discourse in the Digital World illustrates a new, practice-driven approach to technology in second-language (L2) learning that begins with what L2 users do when they connect with others online. With its rich set of examples from a number of different languages and a variety of digital platforms, in and beyond the classroom, this book provides a structured account of L2 computer-mediated discourse. The book is divided into four sections. Section I considers how new media have changed language learning. Section II is about L2 participation in digital forms and practices in online communities. Sections III centers around L2 linguistic and other semiotic practices, including the use of multimodal and multilingual resources while section IV analyzes social practices to explore how networked L2 users build, maintain and challenge relationships. Written in accessible style, the volume will be an important read to anyone interested in L2 use and learning in Web 2.0.

Finalist for the AAAL 2019 book award.

[Language Learning & Language Teaching, 46]  2016.  xiii, 270 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
xi–xii
List of Abbreviations
xiii–xiv
Chapter 1. Computer-mediated discourse
1–18
Section I Web 2.0, computer-mediated discourse, and second-language learning
Chapter 2. The social web and the social turn
21–32
Chapter 3. Analyzing computer-mediated discourse
33–50
Section II Digital practices and language learning
Chapter 4. Networked communities
53–68
Chapter 5. Digital genres
69–86
Chapter 6. Language learner agency
87–104
Section III Linguistic and other semiotic practices of networked L2 use
Chapter 7. Indexing the L2 self
107–122
Chapter 8. Positioning the L2 self
123–140
Chapter 9. Deploying multilingual resources
141–160
Section IV Social practices of networked L2 use
Chapter 10. Negotiating for a supportive space
163–178
Chapter 11. Grounding for intersubjectivity
179–196
Chapter 12. Playing, joking, and amusing yourself and others
197–214
Chapter 13. Talking about language learning
215–230
Chapter 14. L2 CMD and language learning
231–242
References
243–268
Index
269–270
“Ilona Vandergriff offers a fascinating, state-of-the-art examination of computer-mediated discourse and its relation to language learning. Exploring themes such as multilingualism, multimodality, literacy, and identity in contexts ranging from chatrooms and student blogs to Facebook and World of Warcraft, Vandergriff shows us what second-language users actually do with their L2 when they go online. With examples from many different languages, Vandergriff analyzes linguistic patterns as well as social practices to shed light on language users’ agency, creativity, and online intersubjectivity — all of which provides a bounty of food for thought for educators, researchers, and language learners.”
“This book breaks new ground in examining and illustrating the linguistic and digital practices that L2 users employ as part of computer-mediated discourse in the language classroom and in the digital wilds.”
Second-language discourse in the digital world: Linguistic and social practices in and beyond the networked classroom presents a refreshing view of online L2 practices as mitigators of the constraints of language learning in the traditional classroom, highlighting the relevance of foreign language learning in the 21st century as well as the importance of becoming proficient in L2 digital practices.

An excellent and well-written piece that every language teacher interested in understanding how the internet can help their students will enjoy, the book challenges traditional and idealized notions of language learning (i.e. authenticity, monolingualism, nativeness) and presents L2 speakers as competent multilingual digital users who are able to develop new L2 literacies as well as create L2 identities once they are outside of the traditional classroom and its constraining discourse practices.

Using Herring’s (2004) computer-mediated discourse analysis (CMDA) the book highlights multilingual resources that L2 users employ in their multimodal communication, focusing on issues of structure, meaning, interaction management and social phenomena, illustrating these through interactions from a variety of tools and environments, including synchronous computer-mediated communication, wikis, blogs, fandoms, online multiplayer games, virtual worlds, and social networks.

The book highlights the importance of networked communities as places of affinity and learning, digital genres as spaces for linguistic and intercultural growth, and language learner agency exercised through active engagement, alteration of learning activities and challenging of rules and others on the net. It also examines linguistic resources employed by the L2 users as multilingual speakers (i.e. codeswitching) to create a social presence (by indexing the L2 self and by doing relational work) and participate in social networks (by negotiate community norms, establish mutual understanding, using humor, and participate in support networks). These concepts are then explored for their pedagogic value and inclusion into language teaching while critically exploring issues that can marginalize and challenge L2 users.

An excellent read for language educators interested in exploring the possibilities of the internet since the more understanding educators and learners have of linguistic and sociolinguistic practices and issues relevant to online practices, the more effective they will be to position themselves as competent and confident L2 users which will allow them to more fully participate in and benefit from online interactions.”
“Contemporary language use and learning are mediated by an increasingly diverse array of communicative modalities and social practices, creating conditions that present new challenges and opportunities. With this book, Ilona Vandergriff provides an insightful and comprehensive road map to help language educators navigate the complexities of 21st century technologies, cultures, and communicative practices. The text is rich with pedagogically innovative examples that will serve as an invaluable resource for teachers interested in both instructionally located language learning as well as language use and development beyond the classroom.”
“This book unveils and demystifies face practices in Chinese communication through compelling arguments based on strong empirical evidence. Its sound theoretical approach combined with its impressive body of empirical data make for an exemplary study that will be of great value to readers interested in discourse analysis and intercultural communication.”
References

References

Abrams, Z.I.
(2001) Computer-mediated communication and group journals: Expanding the repertoire of participant roles. System, 29(4), 489–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ACTFL
(2014) ACTFL/CAEP Program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. Retrieved Nov. 1, 2015 from http://​www​.actfl​.org​/sites​/default​/files​/pdfs​/ACTFLStandardsJULY2014​.pdf>
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R.
(2008) Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alm, A.
(2009) Blogging for self-determination with L2 learner journals. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 202–221). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B.
(1983) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J.
(2004) Non-native English and sub-cultural identities in media discourse. In H. Sandøy (ed.), Den fl eirspråklege utfordringa / The multilingual challenge (pp. 83–98). Oslo, Norway: Novus.Google Scholar
(2006) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 419–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007a) Language choice and code-switching in German-based diasporic web forums. In B. Danet & S.C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 340–361). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Bilingualism in the mass media and on the Internet. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 207–230). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J., & Beißwenger, M.
(2008) Introduction: Data and methods in computer-mediated discourse analysis. Language at Internet, 5, article 2. Retrieved from http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2008​/1609Google Scholar
Antenos-Conforti, E.
(2009) Microblogging on Twitter: Social networking in intermediate Italian classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 59–90). San Marcos, TX: Calico.Google Scholar
Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F.
(1998) Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 54(3), 314–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Appel, M.C.
(1999) Tandem learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study (CLCS Occasional Paper No. 54). Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College, Centre for Language & Communication Studies.Google Scholar
Archakis, A., & Tsakona, V.
(2005) Analyzing conversational data in GTVH terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construction via humor. Humor, 18(1), 41–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arendholz, J.
(2013) (In)Appropriate online behavior. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O.
(2008) Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233–251.Google Scholar
Arnold, N.
(2007) Technology-mediated learning 10 years later: Emphasizing pedagogical or utilitarian applications? Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 161–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C.
(2009) Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in German classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 115–144). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
(2012) Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, N., & Paulus, T.
(2010) Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 188–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S.
(2005) Humor. Handbook of pragmatics online. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://​www​.benjamins​.com​/online​/hop/ DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P.
(1998) Code-switching in conversation. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Axelsson, A.-S., Abelin, Å., & Schroeder, R.
(2003) ‘Anyone speak Spanish?’ Language encounters in multi-user virtual environments and the influence of technology. New Media and Society, 5(4): 475–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, B.
(2007) Heteroglossia and boundaries. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 257–276). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.S.
(1996) Input in an institutional setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 171–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D., & Lee, C.
(2013) Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Basharina, O.
(2009) Student agency and language-learning processes and outcomes in international online environments. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 390–412.Google Scholar
Basharina, O., Guardado, M., & Morgan, T.
(2008) Negotiating differences: Instructors' reflections on challenges in international telecollaboration. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 65(2), 275-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baym, N.K.
(1995) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved March 2, 2009, from http://​jcmc​.indiana​.edu​/vol1​/issue2​/baym​.htmlGoogle Scholar
(1997) Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside an electronic fan culture. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 103–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2000) Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Beauvois, M.H.
(1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, N.D.
(2002) Using and understanding humor in a second language: A case study (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Retrieved January 6, 2008, from http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/dissertations​/AAI3072971/Google Scholar
(2005) Exploring L2 language play as an aid to SLL: A case study of humour in NS–NNS interaction. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 192–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J.A.
(2002a) The myth of the deficient communicator. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Second language play as a representation of the multicompetent self in foreign language study. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(1), 13–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002c) Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60–81.Google Scholar
(2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117.Google Scholar
Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C.
(2003) Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language learning, 53(4), 591–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J.A., & Müller-Hartmann, A.
(2003) Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 71–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J.A., & Reinhardt, J.
(2004) Aspects of advanced foreign language proficiency: Internet-mediated German language play. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 324–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J.A., & Thorne, S.L.
(Eds.) (2006) Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.
(2013, December 12). The top 10 languages on Twitter. Social Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.adweek​.com​/socialtimes​/twitter​-top​-10​-languages​/494260Google Scholar
Benson, P.
(2007) Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(01), 21–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T.
(1995) Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K.
(1993) Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
(2004) Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Black, R.W.
(2005) Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-learning, 3, 180–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009a) English language learners, fan communities, and twenty-first century skills. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(8), 688–697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Online fan fiction and critical media literacy. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 75–80.Google Scholar
Blake, R.J.
(2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.Google Scholar
(2005) Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497–511.Google Scholar
(2013) Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Blattner, G., & Fiori, M.
(2009) Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17–28.Google Scholar
(2011) Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24-43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Block, D.
(2003) The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) The rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 863–876. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J.
(1998) Debating diversity. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bown, J.
(2009) Self-regulatory strategies and agency in self-instructed language learning: A situated view. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 570–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd-Barrett, O., Nootens, J., & Pugh, A.
(1996) Multilingualism and the mass media. In H. Goebl, P.H. Nelde, Z. Stary, & W. Wölke (Eds.), Kontaktlinguistik/Contact Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 426–431). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
boyd, d
(2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
boyd, d., & Ellison, N.
(2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S.E., & Ohaeri, J.O.
(1999, March). Why do electronic conversations seem less polite? The costs and benefits of hedging. In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes (Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 227–235). ACM.Google Scholar
Broner, M.A., & Tarone, E.E.
(2001) Is it fun? Language play in a fifth-grade Spanish immersion classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 363–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C.
(1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, S., & Adler, R.P.
(2008) Minds on fire: Open education, the long trail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16–32.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J.
(2014) The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103-125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cakir, H., Bichelmeyer, B.A., & Cagiltay, K.
(2005) Effects of cultural differences on e-mail communication in multicultural environments. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronic de Communication, 15(1&2). Retrieved from http://​www​.cios​.org​/EJCPUBLIC​/015​/1​/01512​.HTMLGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M.
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carney, N.
(2009) Blogging in foreign language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 292–312). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, A.
(1997) Joke competence and humor competence. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 10(2), 173–185.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J.
(2013) Defining multilingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
(2011) A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C.A.
(2008). Computer assisted language learning. In B. Spolsky & F.M. Hult (Eds.) The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 585–595). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H.I.
(2013) Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143–170. Retrieved from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/issues​/june2013​/chen​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.
(2009) The effect of applying wikis in an English as a foreign language (EFL) class in Taiwan (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession No. 200920820)Google Scholar
Cherny, L.
(1999) Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Chik, A.
(2015) Recreational language learning and digital practices. In R.H. Jones, A. Chik, & C.A. Hafner (Eds.). Discourse and digital Practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 112–129). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chun, D.M.
(1994) Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M., & Chanier, T.
(2008) Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL, 20(2), 162–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Brennan, S.E.
(1991) Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Codrea-Rado, A.
(2014, February 21). Can I successfully learn a language online? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://​www​.theguardian​.com​/education​/2014​/feb​/21​/can​-i​-learn​-a​-language​-onlineGoogle Scholar
Collentine, K.
(2009) Learner use of holistic language units in multimodal, task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 68–87.Google Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A., Mardomingo, R., & Valentine, C.
(2009) Mobile blogs in language learning: making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(01), 96–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conole, G., & Alevizou, P.
(2010) A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.Google Scholar
Cook, G.
(2000) Language play, language learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V.
(1999) Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2): 185–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Introduction: The changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind. In V. Cook (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 1–18). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2007) The goals of ELT. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 15, pp. 237–248). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., & Anderson, J.R.
(1997) Intelligent tutoring systems. In M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer, & P.V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 849–874). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., Bishop, H., & Garrett, P.
(2003) Home truths: Globalisation and the iconising of Welsh in a Welsh-American newspaper. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), 153–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A.
(2005) Mediating allegations of racism in a multiethnic London school. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice (pp. 55–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A.
(2010) Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1998) Language play. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
(2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Txting. The gr8 db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.
(2000) Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Toronto, Canada: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Danet, B.
(1998) Text as mask: Gender and identity on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 129–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Cyberpl at y: Communicating online. New York, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y.
(1997) Hmmm. Where’s that smoke coming from? Writing, play and performance on Internet relay chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darhower, M.
(2002) Interactional features of synchronous CMC in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249–277.Google Scholar
Darhower, M.A.
(2008) The role of linguistic affordances in telecollaborative chat. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 48–69.Google Scholar
Darics, E.
(2010) Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 6(1), 129–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A.
(1991) The native speaker in Applied Linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Davies, C.E.
(2003) How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1361–1385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
del-Teso-Craviotto, M.
(2006) Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 460–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derks, D., Bos, A.E.R., & von Grumbkow, J.
(2008a) Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 379–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 99–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dervin, F., Lamy, M.-N., & Zourou, K.
(Eds.) (2012) Social networking for language education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J.
(2009) Designing oral participation in Second Life–a comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.M., & Nakano, S.
(2013) Multilinguals’ perceptions of feeling different when switching languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(2), 107–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dippold, D.
(2009) Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorleijn, M. & Nortier, J.
(2009) Code-switching and the Internet. In B.E. Bullock & Toribio, J.A. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 127–141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) The L2 motivational self system. In E. Ushioda & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duber, J.
(2002) Mad blogs and Englishmen. TESL-EJ, 6(2), n2.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J.
(2002, November). Stance and consequence . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association , New Orleans, LA.
(2007) Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ducate, L.C., & Lomicka, L.L.
(2008) Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P.
(2012) Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410–426). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duff, P., & Hornberger, N.
(Eds.) (2008) Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 8. Language socialization. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.
(1998) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
(1997) Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1999) Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In R. Ellis & S. Fotos (Eds.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3–31). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A.
(2010) Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.Google Scholar
European Commission
(2007) Commission of the European Communities. Final Report. High-level Group on Multilingualism. Retrieved September 1, 2009 from http://​ec​.europa​.eu​/education​/policies​/lang​/doc​/multireport​_en​.pdf
Fallows, D.
(2004) The Internet and daily life. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A.
(2013) Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. Calico Journal, 19(2), 279–284.Google Scholar
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G.
(1991) Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotos, S., & Browne, C.
(Eds.) (2004) The development of CALL and current options. In New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fung, L. & Carter, R.
(2007) New varieties, new creativities: ICQ and English- Cantonese e-discourse. Language and Literature, 16(4), 345–366 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallardo del Puerto, F., & Gamboa, E.
(2009) The evaluation of computer‐mediated technology by second language teachers: collaboration and interaction in CALL. Educational Media International, 46(2), 137–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X.
(2010) Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context (Vol. 49). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Garcia, A.C., & Baker Jacobs, J.
(1999) The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, O.
(2007) Foreword. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. xi–xv). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2009) Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson, A.K. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 140–158). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
García, O., & Wei, L.
(2014) Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garrett, N.
(1991) Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 74–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 719–740. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, S.J.
(2004) Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefit for learners. Knowledge Tree e-journal, 30(3), 214–228.Google Scholar
Gee, J.P.
(2004) Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2005) Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language power and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentil, G.
(2011) A biliteracy agenda for genre research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 6–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A.
(1997) Self-presentation and interactional alignments in e-mail discourse: The style- and code switches of Greek messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 141–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Computer-mediated communication. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics online (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://​www​.benjamins​.com​/online​/hop/ DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W.
(2009) Negotiating textual talk: Conversation analysis, pedagogy and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 705–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giridharadas, A.
(2014, January 9). For couples split by distance, two screens can blink as one. The New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2014 from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2014​/01​/10​/arts​/television​/for​-couples​-split​-by​-distance​-two​-screens​-can​-blink​-as​-one​.html​?_r​=0Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R.
(2003) Blogs and wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12–16. Retrieved from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol7num2​/emerging​/default​.htmlGoogle Scholar
(2005) Messaging, gaming, peer-to-peer sharing: Language learning strategies & tools for the millennial generation. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
(2006) Negotiation of face in webchats. Multilingua, 25, 293–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonglewski, M., Meloni, C., & Brant, J.
(2001) Using e-mail in foreign language teaching: Rationale and suggestions. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
Gonzales, A.
(2013) The development of politeness strategies in participatory online environments. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes, (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics and teaching (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Lloret
(2015) Conversation analysis in language learning. Special issue. From second language acquisition to second language use: Qualitative and mixed-methods approaches to research in CALL today. R. Hampel & Stickler (Eds.), CALICO Journal 32(3), 569–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L.
(2014) Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graddol, D.
(1994) Three models of language description. In D. Graddol & O.B. Barret, (Eds.), Media texts: Authors and readers (pp. 1–21). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gravelle, M.
(1996) Supporting bilingual learners in schools. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C., & Shelley, M.
(2013) A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25, 165–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, F.J.
(1997) Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A.F.
(2006) The situation of English in Singapore. In K. Bolton & B.B. Kachru (Eds.), World Englishes: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 369–389). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guth, S., & Helm, F.
(Eds.) (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hall, E.T.
(1976) Beyond culture. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hall, J.K., & Walsh, M.
(2002) Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 186–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, A.D.
(2012) Patterns of emoticon usage in ELS students’ discussion forum writing. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 694–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R., Felix, U., Hauck, M., & Coleman, J.A.
(2005) Complexities of learning and teaching languages in a real-time audiographic environment. German as a Foreign Language, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U.
(2012) The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, K.N., & Wellman, B.
(2000) Examining community in the digital neighborhood: Early results from Canada’s wired suburb. In T. Ishida & K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives (No. 1765, pp. 194–208). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Hancock, J.T.
(2004) Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J.T., & Dunham, P.J.
(2001) Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes, 31(1), 91–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, B.E., & De Nooy, J.
(2003) A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 71–85.Google Scholar
(2009) Learning language and culture via public internet discussion forums. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.B., & Paradice, D.
(2007) An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12), 2081–2090.Google Scholar
Harrison, R., & Thomas, M.
(2009) Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 109–124.Google Scholar
Hay, J.
(2001) The pragmatics of humor support. Humor, 14(1), 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healey, D., Hegelheimer, V., Hubbard, P., Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Kessler, G., & Ware, P.
(2009) TESOL technology standards framework. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Heller, M.
(2006) Linguistic minorities and modernity. A sociolinguistic ethnography. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1989) Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 21–47). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Herring, S.C.
(1996) Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 115–145). Albany, NY: SUNY Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612–634). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004) Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S.A. Barab, R. Kling, & J.H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language at Internet, 4, article 1. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2007​/761Google Scholar
(2013) Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A.M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0. Language and new media (pp. 1–25). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, S.C., & Zelenkauskaite, A.
(2009) Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. Written Communication, 26(1), 5–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E.T.
(1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinnenkamp, V.
(2008) Deutsch, Doyc or Doitsch? Chatters as languagers–The case of a German-Turkish chat room. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 253–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, L.
(2006) Codeswitching on the web. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, C.
(1997) A class of clowns: Spontaneous joking in computer-assisted discussions. Computers and Composition, 14, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., & Marra, M.
(2002) Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. HUMOR. International Journal of Humor Research, 15(1), 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., & Schnurr, S.
(2005) Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 1(1), 121–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E.K., Horwitz, M.B., & Cope, J.
(1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hosoda, Y.
(2000) Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 39–65.Google Scholar
(2002) Analyzing Japanese native-nonnative speaker conversation: Categories, other-repair, and production delay (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
(2006) Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, A.H., Yen, D.C., & Zhang, X.
(2008) Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management, 45(7), 466–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P.
(1996) Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation and implementation. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 15–32). Houston, TX: Athelston.Google Scholar
Hübler, M.T., & Bell, D.C.
(2003) Computer-mediated humor and ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities. Computers and Composition, 20(3), 277–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J.H.
(2005) Incidental and intentional learning. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
(1974) Ways of speaking. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 433–451). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, M.
(2015, May 1). The rise of emoji on Instagram is causing language repercussions. The New York Times. Retrieved June 9, 2015 from http://​bits​.blogs​.nytimes​.com​/2015​/05​/01​/the​-rise​-of​-emoji​-on​-instagram​-is​-causing​-language​-repercussions​/?​_r​=0Google Scholar
Jamieson, J., Chapelle, C., & Preiss, S.
(2005) CALL evaluation by developers, a teacher, and students. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 93–138.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, T., & Moonen, M.
(2011) Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K.E.
(2006) The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J.N., Karrebæk, M.S., Madsen, L.M., & Møller, J.S.
(2011) Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 23–38.Google Scholar
Kaleem, J.
(2013, August 9). Scott Simon’s tweets about dying mother spur conversation on public grief, death on social media. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://​www​.huffingtonpost​.com​/2013​/08​/09​/scott​-simon​-tweets​_n​_3721527​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kalman, Y.M., & Gergle, D.
(2009, November). Letter and punctuation mark repeats as cues in computer-mediated communication . Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the National Communication Association , Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://​www​.kalmans​.com​/NCA09Cues​.pdf
Kasper, G.
(2004) Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Ross, S.
(2003) Repetition as a source of miscommunication in oral proficiency interviews. In J. House, G. Kasper, & S. Ross (Eds.), Misunderstanding in social life (pp. 82–106). Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Katsuno, H., & Yano, C.
(2007) Kaomoji and expressivity in a Japanese housewives’ chatroom. In B. Danet & S.C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 278–299). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J., & Aspden, P.
(1997) A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, B.
(2010) A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(3), 65–80.Google Scholar
Kayan, S., Fussell, S.R., & Setlock, L.D.
(2006, November). Cultural differences in the use of instant messaging in Asia and North America. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 525–528). ACM. Crossref
Kelm, O.R.
(1992) The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441– 454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The application of computer networking in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning, 19–28.Google Scholar
Kenning, M.M.
(2010) Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22(1), 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R.G.
(1994) The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 441–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the Internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R.G., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M.
(2004) Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R.G., & Warschauer, M.
(2000) Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G.
(2006) Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 23–42). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Student-initiated focus to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95. Retrieved August 31, 2013, from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol13num1​/kessler​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D.
(2010) Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J.
(2012) Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.Google Scholar
Knowles, M.
(1975) Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago, IL: Follet.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Y.
(2002) The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students’ attitudes towards English learning. Gender and Education, 14(2), 181–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopomaa, T.
(2005) The breakthrough of text messaging in Finland. In R. Harper, L. Palen, & A. Taylor (Eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS (pp. 147–159). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Kötter, M.
(2003) Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145–172.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(1998) Language and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., A’Ness, F., & Lam, E.
(2000) Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78–104.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(2014) Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S.
(2002) Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83–100). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L.
(2008) An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction [Special issue on mobile assisted language learning]. ReCALL, 20(3), 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurhila, S.
(2001) Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1083–1110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuriscak, L.M., & Luke, C.L.
(2009) Language learner attitudes toward virtual worlds: An investigation of Second Life. In L. Lomicka & Lord, G. (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 173–198). San Marcos, TX: CALICO/Texas State University.Google Scholar
Kytölä, S., & Androutsopoulos, J.
(2012) 11 ethnographic perspectives on multilingual computer-mediated discourse. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse, and ethnography (pp. 179–196). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lafford, B.
(2009) Toward an ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991) [Focus issue]. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 673-696. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lam, W.S.E.
(2000) L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Second language literacy and identity formation on the Internet: The case of Chinese immigrant youth in the US (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2004a) Border discourses and identities in transnational youth culture. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth (pp. 79–97). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2004b) Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65.Google Scholar
(2006) Re-envisioning language, literacy, and the immigrant subject in new mediascapes. Pedagogies, 1(3), 171–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Language socialization in online communities. In A. Creese, P. Martin, & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2859-2869). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Literacy and learning across transnational online spaces. E-Learning, 6(4), 303–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lam, W.S.E., & Kramsch, C.
(2003) The ecology of an SLA community in computer-mediated environments. In J. Leather & J. van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 141–158). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lam, W.S.E., & Rosario-Ramos, E.
(2009) Multilingual literacies in transnational digitally mediated contexts: An exploratory study of immigrant teens in the United States. Language and Education, 23(2), 171–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, M.N.
(2004) Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(02), 520-538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, M.N., & Hampel, R.
(2007) Online communication for language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.P.
(1997) The function of language play in the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In W.R. Glass & A.T. Perez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish (pp. 3–24). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Genung, P.
(2002) “I’d rather switch than fight”: An activity-theoretic study of power, success, and failure in a foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 175–196). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S.L.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.
(2013) “My English is so poor…So I take photos”: Metalinguistic discourses about English on Flickr. In D. Tannen & A.M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0. Language and new media (pp. 73–83). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C., & Barton, D.
(2012) Multilingual texts on web 2.0: The case of Flickr.com. In M. Sebba, S. Mahootian, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing (pp. 128–145). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, L.
(2009) Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: A study of Spanish–American telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(5), 425–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leier, V.
(2012) Facebook used in a German film project. The EUROCALL Review. Proceedings of the EUROCALL 2011 Conference (Vol. 20, pp. 95–99). Nottingham, UK: Eurocall. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://​eurocall​.webs​.upv​.es​/documentos​/newsletter​/papers​_20(1)​/22​_leier​.pdf
Leja, H.
(2007) Improving writing skills in foreign language classes. In M. Camilleri, P. Ford, H. Leja, & V. Sollars (Eds.), Blogs: Web journal in language education (pp. 27–34). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved March 30, 2010, http://​www​.ecml​.at​/documents​/D1​_Blogs​_E​_web​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Fox, S.
(2006) Bloggers: A portrait of the Internet’s new storytellers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M.
(2007) Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
Leppänen, S.
(2007) Cybergirls in trouble: Fan fiction as a discursive space for interrogating gender and sexuality. In C.-R. Caldas-Coulthard & R. Iedema (Eds.), Identity in trouble: Critical discourse and contested identities (pp. 156–179). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2012) Linguistic and generic hybridity in web writing: The case of fan fiction. In M. Sebba, S. Mahootian, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing (pp. 233–254). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leppänen, S., & Peuronen, S.
(2012) Multilingualism and the Internet. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (384–402). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levy, M.
(1997) Computer assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C.
(2012) Translanguaging: Origins and development from school to street and beyond. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 641–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lexander, K.V.
(2010) Voeux électroniques plurilingues : nouvelles pratiques, nouvelles fonctions pour les langues africaines? Journal of Language Contact, THEMA 3, 228–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liaw, M.L.
(2006) E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 49–64.Google Scholar
Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R.
(2012) Transforming online learning through narrative and student agency. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 344–355.Google Scholar
Locher, M.A.
(2008) Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In G. Antos, E. Ventola, & T. Weber (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 409–540). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, M.A., & Bolander, B.
(2014) Relational work and the display of multilingualism in two Facebook groups. In G. Held, C. Maaß & K. Bedijs (Eds.), Face work and social media Series (pp. 157–191). Berlin, Germany: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Locher, M., & Watts, R.J.
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 9–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G.
(Eds.) (2009) The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).Google Scholar
Long, M.H.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lord, G.
(2008) Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 364–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lund, A.
(2008) Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lundin, R.W.
(2008) Teaching with wikis: Towards a networked pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 25, 432–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mak, B., & Coniam, D.
(2008) Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36(3), 437–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markee, N.
(2000) Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marques-Schäfer, G.
(2013) Deutsch lernen online. Eine Analyse interkultureller Interaktionen im Chat. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Martineau, W.H.
(1972) A model of the social functions of humor. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 101–125). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, D.W., & Zimmerman, D.H.
(1984) Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 301–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McBride, K.
(2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for recreation (Vol. 8). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
McGinnis, T., Goodstein-Stolzenberg, A., & Saliani, E.C.
(2008) “indnpride”: Online spaces of transnational youth as sites of creative and sophisticated literacy and identity work. Linguistics and Education, 18(3), 283-304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMahill, C.
(1997) Communities of resistance: A case study of two feminist English classes in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 612–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Self-expression, gender, and community: A Japanese feminist English class. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 307–344). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mercer, S.
(2011) Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C.
(1999) Computers as tools for sociocollaborative language learning. Computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Media, design and applications, 144–152.Google Scholar
Meskill, C., & Anthony, N.
(2010) Teaching languages online (Vol. 6). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Meunier, L.
(1998) Personality and motivational factors in electronic networking. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of teaching and learning: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 145–197). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Mey, J.L.
(2001) Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mills, N.
(2011) Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, K.
(2012) A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T.
(2010) Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molka-Danielsen, J., & Deutschmann, M.
(Eds.) (2009) Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morand, D., & Ocker, R.J.
(2003, January). Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: A sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages. In System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 10). IEEE.
Morita, N.
(2004) Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morley, D., & Robins, K.
(1996) Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A.
(2006) Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration: A model for language teacher education. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, 63–84.Google Scholar
Murray, L., & Hourigan, T.
(2008) Blogs for specific purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach?. ReCALL, 20(01), 82–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P.
(2000) Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing (Vol. 11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, E.
(2005) Language use in Japanese as a foreign language classrooms. (Unpublished MA thesis). University of British Columbia: Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Nastri, J., Peña J., & Hancock, J.T.
(2006) The construction of away messages: A speech act analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1025–1045. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Y.
(2007) Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication. In B. Danet & S.C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 163–183). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
North, S.
(2007) ‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 538–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B.
(1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2001) Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159–171). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–427). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R.
(2003) Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118–144.Google Scholar
(2007) Foreign language education and the rise of online communication: A review of promises and realities. In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 17–37). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M.
(2006) Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623–642.Google Scholar
Ong, K.K.W.
(2011) Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats. Discourse Studies, 13(2), 211–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, T.
(2005)  What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software . Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://​www​.oreilly​.com​/pub​/a​/web2​/archive​/what​-is​-web​-20​.html
Ortega, L.
(2009, September). Tasks and technology in language learning: Elective affinities and (dis-) encounters. Plenary delivered at the 3rd International Task-Based Language Teaching Conference (pp. 13–16), Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
(2013) SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63(s1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.) The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A.
(2010) Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 240–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R.L.
(2013) Teaching and researching: Language learning strategies. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paolillo, J.C.
(1996) Language choice on soc.culture.punjab. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronic de Communication, 6(3). Retrieved from http://​www​.cios​.org​/EJCPUBLIC​/006​/3​/006312​.HTMLGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Z.
(2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1-2), 199-220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Conclusion: A networked self. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 304–318). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pasfield-Neofitou, S.
(2011) Online domains of language use: Second language learners’ experiences of virtual community and foreignness. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 92–108. Retrieved from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/issues​/june2011​/pasfieldneofitou​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pasfield-Neofitou, S.E.
(2012) Online communication in a second language: Social interaction, language use, and learning Japanese (Vol. 66). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A.
(Eds.) (2004) Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J.P.
(2000) Second language learning as participation and the (re) construction of selves. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M.
(2009) From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. Crawley, Western Australia: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Pellettieri, J.
(2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R.G. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M.
(2006) Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL, 24(1), 20–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J.
(1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pinkman, K.
(2005) Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12–24.Google Scholar
Poppi, F.
(2013) Global interactions in English as a Lingua Franca: how written communication is changing under the influence of electronic media and new contexts of use. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preisler, B.
(1999) Functions and forms of English in an European EFL country. In T. Bex & R.J. Watts (Eds), Standard English: The widening debate (pp. 239–67). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Procter-Legg, E., Cacchione, A., & Petersen, S.A.
(2012, October). LingoBee and social media: Mobile language learners as social networkers . Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) , Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from http://​files​.eric​.ed​.gov​/fulltext​/ED542698​.pdf
Provine, R.R., Spencer, R.J., & Mandell, D.L.
(2007) Emotional expression online emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 299–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quittner, J.
(1996, November 25). Mr. Rheingold’s neighborhood. Time. Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://​content​.time​.com​/time​/magazine​/article​/0,9171,985581,00​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Raith, T.
(2009) The use of weblogs in language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 274–291). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.
(1990) Displacing the “native speaker”: Expertise, affiliation and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. Manchester, UK: St Jerome Press.Google Scholar
Ricento, T.
(2005) Considerations of identity in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 895–911). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Richardson, W.
(2006) Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Riley, K.C.
(2008) Language socialization. In B. Spolsky and F.M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 317–410). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rintel, E.S., Pittam, J., & Mulholland, J.
(2003) Time will tell: Ambiguous non-responses on Internet relay chat. Electronic Journal of Communication, 13(1). Retrieved from http://​www​.academia​.edu​/469054​/Time​_will​_tell​_Ambiguous​_non​-responses​_on​_Internet​_relay​_chatGoogle Scholar
Riordan, M.A., & Kreuz, R.J.
(2010) Cues in computer-mediated communication: A corpus analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1806–1817. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, M., & Black, C.
(2012) Public Internet forums: Can they enhance argumentative writing skills of second language learners? Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 349–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.T., & Smith-Lovin, L.
(2001) Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W.
(1999) Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
Rouzie, A.
(2001) Conversation and carrying-on: Play, conflict, and serio-ludic discourse in synchronous computer conferencing. College Composition and Communication, 53(2), 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4, Part 1), 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarbaugh-Thompson, M., & Feldman, M.S.
(1998) Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying “hi” really matter?. Organization Science, 9(6), 685–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauro, S.
(2011) SCMC for SLA. A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 87(2), 269–291.Google Scholar
(2014) Lessons from the fandom. Technology-mediated tasks for language learning. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 239–261). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1994) Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. Consciousness in second language learning, 11, 237–326.Google Scholar
Schönfeldt, J., & Golato, A.
(2003) Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on language and social interaction, 36(3), 241–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D.H., & Ertmer, P.A.
(2000) Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schweinhorst, K.
(2004) Native speaker/non-native speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-base environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 35–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V.M.
(2010) Double talk: Deconstructing monolingualism in classroom second language learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Seckman, M.A., & Couch, C.J.
(1989) Jocularity, sarcasm and social relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(3), 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sfard, A.
(1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.
(2009) The relationship between scrolling, negotiation, and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC environment. CALICO journal, 26(2), 231–245.Google Scholar
Soares, D. de A.
(2008) Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 517–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sollars, V.
(2007) Writing experiences in a second/foreign language classroom: From theory to practice. In M. Camilleri, P. Ford, H. Leja, & V. Sollars (Eds.), Blogs: Web journal in language education (pp. 15–24). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Sotillo, S.M.
(2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 82–119. Retrieved June 2, 2004, from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol4num1​/sotillo​/default​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Spodark, E.
(2001) The changing role of the teacher: A technology-enhanced, student-centered lesson on French fashion. Foreign Language Annals, 34(1), 46–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanone, M.A., & Gay, G.
(2008) Structural reproduction of social networks in computer-mediated communication forums. Journal of Behavior and Information Technology, 27(2), 97–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M.P., & Liu, M.
(2010) Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R.
(2010) CyberDeutsch: Language production and user preferences in a Moodle virtual learning environment. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 49–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, G.
(2007) A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCall, 19(2), 105–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, G., & Tanaka-Ellis, N.
(2012) Diversity in environments. In G. Stockwell (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 71–89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, C.
(1995) Silicon snake oil. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Stommel, W.
(2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. In J. Androutsopoulos & M. Beißwenger (Eds.), Data and methods in computer-mediated discourse analysis [Special issue]. Language at Internet, 5, article 5. Retrieved from http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2008​/1537Google Scholar
Stommel, W., & Koole, T.
(2010) The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 357–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2011) Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strampel, K., & Oliver, R.
(2008) We’ve thrown away the pens, but are they learning? Using blogs in higher education. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008 (pp. 991–1001). Retrieved from http://​www​.ascilite​.org​.au​/conferences​/melbourne08​/procs​/strampel​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Strand, M., Udas, K., & Lee, Y.
(2004) Design for communities of practice: Eduforge. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfortzone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 887–890). Perth: ASCILITE. Retrieved August 31, 2013, from http://​www​.ascilite​.org​.au​/conferences​/perth04​/procs​/strand​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, N.
(1998) Developing critical reading and writing skills: Empowering minority students in a networked computer classroom. In J. Swaffar (Ed.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 41–56). Austin, TX: Daedalus Group.Google Scholar
Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E.
(1996) A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24(4), 491–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P.
(2000) Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 115–131). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L.
(2010) Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, J.
(2005) Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399–431.Google Scholar
(2009) Learner requests in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatic acquisition. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 199–234). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).Google Scholar
Tan, A.
(2011) Why write with wikis? In C.M.L. Ho, K.T. Anderson, & A.P. Leong (Eds.), Transforming literacies and language: Multimodality and literacy in the new media age (pp. 207–222). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(2013) The medium is the metamessage: conversational style in new media interaction. In D. Tannen & A.M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: language and new media (pp. 99–118). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E.
(2000) Getting serious about language play: Language play, interlanguage variation, and second-language acquisition. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M.E. Anderson, C.A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition. Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 31–54). Somerville, NJ: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Speaking in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 485–502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.J., & Cameron, D.
(1987) Analysing conversation: Rules and units in the structure of talk. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.
(Ed.) (2009) Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Task-based language teaching and CALL. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 341–358). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L.
(1999) An activity theoretical analysis of foreign language electronic discourse. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Education, Language Literacy and Culture, The University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Black, R.
(2007) Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Black, R.W.
(2011) Identity and interaction in Internet-mediated contexts. In C. Higgins (Ed.), Identity formation in globalizing contexts (pp. 257–278). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Payne, J.S.
(2005) Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371–397.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Reinhardt, J.
(2008) "Bridging activities," new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558–572.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Smith, B.
(2011) Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 268–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, M.
(2002) Rethinking learner support: The challenge of collaborative online learning. Open Learning, 17(2), 105–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A.
(2004) Computer mediated communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R.
(2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82–99.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, S.
(2009) Doing (bi)lingualism: Language alternation as performative construction of online identities. Pragmatics 19(3), 361–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tu, C.H.
(2000) On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in CMC environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), 45–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tu, C.H., Blocher, M., & Roberts, G.
(2008) Constructs for Web 2.0 learning environments: A theatrical metaphor. Educational Media International, 45(4), 253–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tudini, V.
(2007) Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 577–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Online second language acquisition. Conversation analysis of online chat. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Turkle, S.
(1995) Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E.
(2006) Language motivation in a reconfigured Europe: Access, identity, autonomy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(2), 148–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Motivation, autonomy and metacognition: Exploring their interactions. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J.M. Sierra, (Eds.) Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 31-49). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. A theoretical overview. In E. Ushioda & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 1–8). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Utz, S.
(2000) Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1). Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://​JOB​/v1n1​/utz​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vaisman, C.
(2011) Performing girlhood through typographic play in Hebrew blogs. In C. Thurlow & K Mroczek. (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in new media (pp. 177–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Compernolle, R.A., & Williams, L.
(2012) Reconceptualizing sociolinguistic competence as mediated action: Identity, meaning making, agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 234–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandergriff, I.
(2006) Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 110–138.Google Scholar
(2010a, June–July). “It’s only a class”: Relational work and disagreement in computer-mediated classroom discussions. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Politeness , Basel, Switzerland.
(2013a) Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics 51, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) “My major is English, belive it or not:)”—Participant orientations in nonnative/native text chat. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 393–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use. Language at Internet, 11, article 4. urn:nbn:de:0009-7-39846Google Scholar
(2015) Exercising learner agency in forum interactions on a professionally-moderated language learning networking site. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.). Researching Language Learner Interaction Online: From Social Media to MOOCs. Chapter 10. (CALICO Monograph Series Volume 5). San Marcos, TX: CALICO Publications.Google Scholar
Vandergriff, I., & Fuchs, C.
(2009) Does CMC promote language play? Exploring humor in two modalities. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 26–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) How to laugh online—Humor support in synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC). HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(4), 437–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L.
(2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008a) Agency in the classroom. In J.P. Lantolf & M.E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2008b) The ecology of language learning and sociocultural theory. In A. Creese, P. Martin, & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2949-2961). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, M.
(2008) Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1022–1036. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M.
(2001) Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 210–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walther, J.B.
(1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Language and communication technology: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 384–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J.B., & D’Addario, K.P.
(2001) The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y.
2006Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL 18(1), 122–145 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ware, P.D.
(2003) From involvement to engagement in online communication: Promoting intercultural competence in foreign language education (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2005) “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89.Google Scholar
Ware, P.D., & Kramsch, C.
(2005) Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 190-205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, C.N.
(2004) It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 69–87. Retrieved June 1, 2004, from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol8num2​/warner​/default​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M.
(1995) Virtual connections. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
(1997) Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 453–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., Said, G.R.E., & Zohry, A.G.
(2002) Language choice online: Globalization and identity in Egypt. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4), CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waseleski, C.
(2006) Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted on two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1012–1024. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E.
(1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wei, L.
(2011) Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identity space by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–1235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wei, L,. Milroy, L., & Ching, P.S.
(1992) A two‐step sociolinguistic analysis of codeswitching and language choice: the example of a bilingual Chinese community in Britain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia
(2008) Definition of a blog. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://​en​.wikipedia​.org​/wiki​/BlogGoogle Scholar
Williams, C.
(2002) Extending bilingualism in the education system. Education and lifelong learning committee ELL-06-2. Retrieved from http://​www​.assemblywales​.org​/3c91c7af00023d820000595000000000​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E.
(2000) Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J.
(2000) Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, M., & Akahori, K.
(2007) Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yee, N., & Bailenson, J.
(2007) The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self‐representation on behavior. Human communication research, 33(3), 271-290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Y.
(2007) Engaging literacy: A biliterate student’s composing practices beyond school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 23–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Relay writing in an adolescent online community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(8), 670–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, R., & He, A.W.
(Eds.) (1998) Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, F.R.
(2005) Attitudes and emotions through written text: The case of textual deformation in Internet chat rooms. Pragmalingüística, 13, 147–173.Google Scholar
(2011) Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziv, A.
(1984) Personality and sense of humor. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Zorko, V.
(2009) Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645–665. Retrieved August 31, 2013, from http://​www​.ascilite​.org​.au​/ajet​/ajet25​/zorko​.html DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zourou, K.
(2012) On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: A look at the state of the art. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information de Communication (ALSIC), 15(1). Retrieved from http://​alsic​.revues​.org​/2436Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Chachkine, Elsa
2020.  In Language learning and professionalization in higher education: pathways to preparing learners and teachers in/for the 21st century,  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Cloutier, Robert, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Radosław Święciński, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Alexander Kautzsch, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise & Jessica Norledge
2018. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies 97:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Hsiao-chien
2018. Writing responses to images when developing higher-order thinking: A case study of EFL college students in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning 42:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Meurice, Alice & Fanny Meunier
2020.  In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava
2019. Technology-mediated feedback and instruction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Reinhardt, Jonathon
2020. Metaphors for social media‐enhanced foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals 53:2  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
White, Jonathan R.
2018.  In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
White, Jonathan R.
2019.  In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20],  pp. 535 ff. Crossref logo
Zourou, Katerina
2019.  In The Handbook of Informal Language Learning,  pp. 369 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CJA – Language teaching theory & methods
BISAC Subject: FOR000000 – FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2016021086 | Marc record