Chapter published in:Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 105–126
Chapter 5. The limits of instruction
40 years after “Interlanguage”
This chapter argues that Selinker’s (1972) claim that instruction does not significantly affect interlanguage development is essentially correct. Reviewing general research on instructed second language acquisition as well as some recent research of my own, I argue that instructed SLA to date has failed to consider underlying constraints and processes in interlanguage development. In addition, I argue that the fundamental problem in instructed SLA is its overall focus on the acquisition of “rules”; that is, rules are not acquired from the input. Instead, learners process morpho-phonological units in the speech stream and assemble language over time. Rules, if they exist, evolve; they cannot be the object of instruction or input processing.
Published online: 30 April 2014
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C.
de Graaff, R.
Keating, G.D., VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J.
Kessler, J., Liebner, M. & Mansouri, F.
Krashen, S. D.
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L.
Pérez-Leroux, A.T., & Glass, W.
Rothman, J., & VanPatten, B.
Smith, M. C. & VanPatten, B.
in press). Instructed SLA as parameter setting: Evidence from earliest-stage learners of Japanese as L2. In C. Laval & M.J. Arche (Eds.), The Grammar Dimension in Instructed Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Research, and Practice . London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
in press) Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity: Recent research on processing instruction. In C. Sanz & B. Lado (Eds.), Individual Differences, L2 Development and Language Program Administration: From Theory to Application . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
forthcoming). Input processing by novice learners: Issues in the nature of processing and in research methods. In Z-H. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First Exposure to a Second Language: Learners’ Initial Input Processing . Cambridge: CUP.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C.
VanPatten, B. & Rothman, J.
in press). What does current generative theory suggest about the explicit-implicit debate? In R. Rebuchat (Ed.), Explicit and Implicit Learning of Languages . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
VanPatten, B., Borst, S., Collopy, E., Qualin, A., & Price, J.
VanPatten B, Keating G, & Leeser M.
Cited by other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.