Article published in:
Atypical predicate-argument relations
Edited by Thierry Ruchot and Pascale Van Praet
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 33] 2016
► pp. 115130
References

References

Ackema, Peter & Maaike Schoorlemmer
1994The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua 93. 59–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1997Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook of generative syntax, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
British national corpus
compiled by the British National Corpus Consortium. http://​sara​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk​/lookup​.html
Brousseau, Anne-Marie & Elizabeth Ritter
1991A non-unified analysis of agentive verbs. In Proceedings of the Tenth west coast conference on formal linguistics , 53–65. Stanford, CA: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998The emergent lexicon. Proceedings from the Panels of the Chicago linguistic society’s meeting 34. 421–435.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Liesbet Heyvaert
2003On the so-called ‘middle’ construction in English and Dutch. In Sylviane Granger, Jacques Lerot, & Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds.), Empirical approaches to contrastive linguistics and translation studies, 57–73. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo
1989The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 18–30.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1973Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics 9. 11–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Sara Geyskens
1998Have you walked the dog yet? The ergative causativization of intransitives. Word 49(2). 155–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1991A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doron, Edith & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1991Affectedness and externalization. Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the north eastern linguistic society 21. 81–94.
Erades, P.A.
1975Points of modern English syntax. Contributions to English studies by P.A. Erades. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M.
1988The English middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 181–203.Google Scholar
1992The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
1985Adverbs in agentless actives and passives. Papers from Parasession on causatives and agentivity. Chicago linguistic society 21(2). 21–31.
1989On the reflexive middle in English. Papers from the Annual regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society 25(1). 123–132.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
García de la Maza, Casilda
2008Intransitivity, ergatives and middles. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 16. 31–50.Google Scholar
2011The semantics of English middles and pseudo-middles. In Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.) Morphosyntactic alternations in English: Functional and cognitive perspectives, 161–181. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013The conventionalisation of contextual effects in middle structures. International Journal of English Studies 13(1). 111–131.Google Scholar
2014Affectedness revisited. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 30(1). 53–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2001Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences 23. 503–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Pragmatics and argument structure. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 427–441. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grady, Michael
1965The mediopassive voice in modern English. Word 21. 270–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1990A student’s grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1967Look and see. Language 43(4). 937–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1967Notes on transitivity and Theme in English. Part I. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Ian Roberts
1993Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In Eric 
Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language, Volume II, lexical and conceptual structure, 183–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1984Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2007English mediopassive constructions. A cognitive, corpus-based study of their origin, spread and current status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1972Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1992Babe Ruth homered his way into the hearts of America. In Timothy Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and the lexicon, 155–178. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1909–49A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 7 Heidelberg: Carl Winters (volumes I–IV); Copenhagen: Munksgaard (volumes V–VII).Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay, & Thomas Roeper
1984On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 381–416.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Maria
2002Middle semantics and its realization in English and Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 399–416.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1994A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua 92. 35–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana I.
2011Spontaneous and facilitative events revisited. In Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English: Functional and cognitive perspectives, 137–160. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
2000Relaciones de Interficie: los Verbos de Cambio de Estado. In Ana Bravo, Carlos Luján, & Isabel Pérez (eds.), Cuadernos de Lingüística VII, 125–144. Madrid: Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1969Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii. In Ivan F. Vardul (ed.), Jazykovye universalii I lingvisticeskaja tipologija, 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1978Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society 21. 157–189.
Rapoport, Tova R.
1999The middle, agents, and for-phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1). 147–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. & B. Levin
2012Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj, & Tal Siloni (eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the Interface, 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian G.
1987The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosta, Andrew
1995The semantics of English mediopassives. In Bas Aarts & Charles F. 
Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 123–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Paul Hopper
2001Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 27–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosten, Jeanne
1977Subjects and agenthood in English. Papers from the Annual regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society 13. 459–471.
Vendler, Zeno
1984Adverbs of action. Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics. Chicago linguistic society 20(2). 297–305.
Williams, Edwin
1981Argument structure and morphology. The linguistic review 1. 81–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar