Article published in:
The Complementary Contribution of Comparable and Parallel Corpora to Crosslinguistic Studies
Edited by Sylviane Granger and Marie-Aude Lefer
[Languages in Contrast 20:2] 2020
► pp. 288–313

Dialogue vs. narrative in fiction

A cross-linguistic comparison

| University of Oslo , Norway
| University of Oslo , Norway
This paper explores both comparable and translation data from the fiction part of the English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus (ENPC) in a new way. Rather than studying fiction as a unified register, we investigate to what extent fiction can be seen to contain (at least) two distinct registers – dialogue and narrative – and to what extent this may have implications for contrastive studies based on a corpus such as the ENPC. Token counts show that, although the texts are predominantly narrative in nature, the Norwegian texts are even more so than the English ones. On the basis of word lists, two items proportionally more frequent in dialogue and that had previously been studied on the basis of the fiction texts in the ENPC were identified and chosen for further scrutiny: there and see. Results from these two case studies uncover some differences in the use of there and see in dialogue vs. narrative, most conspicuously for see where its preferred use in dialogue is the cognition sense and in narrative the perception sense. For there, a noticeable difference is the choice of verb in the Norwegian translations of existential there-clauses in dialogue and narrative. In narrative, verbs other than verbs of existence are sometimes chosen, while this is never the case in dialogue.
Keywords: contrastive analysis, fiction, dialogue, narrative, verb see , existential there , English/Norwegian
Published online: 06 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00019.oks
References

References

Aijmer, K.
2004 The Interface between Perception, Evidentiality and Discourse Particle Use – Using a Translation Corpus to Study the Polysemy of see . TradTerm 10: 246–277.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B.
1999 Adverbial Connectors in English and Swedish: Semantic and Lexical Correspondences. In Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, H. Hasselgård and S. Oksefjell (eds), 249–268. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Anthony, L.
2018 AntConc (version 3.5.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software
Biber, D.
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E.
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Breivik, L. E.
1990  Existential there. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Chocholoušová, B.
2007 Norwegian Det-Constructions and their Translation Correspondences in English and German: A Contrastive Corpus Based Study of Dummy Subjects. Masterʼs Dissertation, Masaryk University.Google Scholar
2008  There and it in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. A Parallel Corpus Study of English Dummy Subjects and their Translation Equivalents in Norwegian and German. Masterʼs Dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Cortes, V.
2008 A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Academic History Writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 3(1): 43–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Haan, P.
1996 More on the Language of Dialogue in Fiction. ICAME Journal 20: 23–40.Google Scholar
Dupont, M. and Zufferey, S.
2017 Methodological Issues in the Use of Directional Parallel Corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2): 270–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, J.
2000 Presentative Constructions in English and Norwegian. A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study. Oslo: Acta Humaniora.Google Scholar
[ p. 312 ]
Ebeling, J. and Ebeling, S. O.
2013 Patterns in Contrast. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, S. O. and Ebeling, J.
2017 A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Recurrent Word Combinations in a Comparable Corpus of English and Norwegian Fiction. In Contrasting English and Other Languages through Corpora, M. Janebová, E. Lapshinova-Koltunski and M. Martinková (eds), 2–31. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2020 Contrastive Analysis, Tertium Comparationis and Corpora. Nordic Journal of English Studies 19(1): 97–117.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. and Mahlberg, M.
2017 Fiction – One Register or Two? Narrative and Fictional Speech in Dickens’s Novels. Paper presented at the Ninth International Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, 25–28 July 2017. Available at https://​www​.birmingham​.ac​.uk​/Documents​/college​-artslaw​/corpus​/conference​-archives​/2017​/general​/paper323​.pdf [last accessed 7 May 2019].
Gledhill, C.
2000 The Discourse Function of Collocation in Research Article Introductions. English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 115–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
2014 A Lexical Bundle Approach to Comparing Languages: Stems in English and French. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 58–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.
2002 Information Structure and the Use of Cleft Sentences in English and Norwegian. In Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 113–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. Revised by C. M. I .M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H.
2017 Temporal Expressions in English and Norwegian. In Contrasting English and Other Languages through Corpora, M. Janebová, E. Lapshinova-Koltunski and M. Martinková (eds), 75–101. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Johansson, S.
2007 Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S., Ebeling, J. and Oksefjell, S.
1999/2001 The English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus: Manual. Institutt for britiske og amerikanske studier, Universitetet i Oslo. Available at http://​www​.hf​.uio​.no​/ilos​/english​/services​/omc​/enpc​/ENPCmanual​.pdf [last accessed 7 May 2019].
Johansson, S. and Hofland, K.
1994 Towards an English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus. In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, U. Fries, G. Tottie and P. Schnieder (eds), 25–37. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lefer, M.-A. and Vogeleer, S.
(eds) 2014 Genre- and Register-Related Discourse Features in Contrast. Special issue of Languages in Contrast 14(1).Google Scholar
Lewis, D.
2017 Coherence Relations and Information Structure in English and French Political Speeches. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-Pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres, K. Aijmer and D. Lewis (eds), 141–161. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, S.
2013 Contrastive Register Variation. A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordrum, L., Ebeling, S. O. and Hasselgård, H.
2016 Introduction – Languages in Contrast 20 Years on. Nordic Journal of English Studies 15(3): 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Øhman, B. I.
2006 An SFG Perspective on the Polysemy of See: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study. Master’s Dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
[ p. 313 ]
R Core Team
2014 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://​www​.R​-project​.org/ [last accessed 7 May 2019].
Semino, E. and Short, M.
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. and Barth, I.
2003 Using Recurrent Phrases as Text-Type Discriminators. A Quantitative Method and Some Findings. Functions of Language 10(1): 61–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teich, E.
2003 Cross-Linguistic Variation in System and Text. A Methodology for the Investigation of Translation and Comparable Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. and Darbelnet, J.
1958 [1977] Stylistique comparée du franc̦ais et de l’anglais. Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier. Transl. J. C. Sager and M.-J. Hamel. Comparative Stylistics of French and English. A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1995.Google Scholar

Corpus

The English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus (1994–1997)
Dept. of British and American Studies, University of Oslo Compiled by Stig Johansson (project leader), Knut Hofland (project leader), Jarle Ebeling (research assistant), Signe Oksefjell (research assistant) http://​www​.hf​.uio​.no​/ilos​/english​/services​/omc​/enpc/ last accessed 7 May 2019