Article published in:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 306321
References

References

Bianchi, C.
(Ed.) 2004The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1975Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2), 406–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
1979The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 203–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, O.
2000Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition (pp. 99–115). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enger, H.
2004Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 27, 5–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 36(3), 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I.
1976Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), 391–428.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H.
2007Agreeing to disagree: Agreement with non-agreeing antecedents, with focus on Sanskrit and Latin. Presentation at East Coast Indo-European Conference, Yale University, June 2007.
Hoffner, H., & Melchert, H. C.
2008Hittite grammar. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A., & Joseph, B. D.
2014Limiting the power of zero: Agreement with Sanskrit elliptic duals. Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN, January 4, 2014.
Joseph, B. D.
1979On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics, 17, 519–23.Google Scholar
Kathol, A.
1999Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In R. D. Levine, & G. M. Green (Eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar (pp. 223–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
2010Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language, 86(2), 302–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliphant, S. G.
1912The Vedic dual: Part VI, the elliptic dual; Part VII, the dual dvandva. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 32, 33–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
2013Что дѣлать? what is to be done? Plenary talk at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 4 January 2013.
Szabo, Z.
2005Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
2008Semantics versus pragmatics. Encyclopaedia of the linguistic sciences: Issues and theories. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A.
1987Phonologically conditioned agreement and purely morphological features. Technical report UCSC Syntax Research Center, Report SRC-87-06.