Article published in:
Interfaces in Romance: A constraint-based approach
Edited by Gabriela Bîlbîie
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43:1] 2020
► pp. 129168
References

References

Bach, K.
1999The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), 327–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bargmann, S. & Sailer, M.
2018The syntactic flexibility of semantically non-decomposable idioms. In M. Sailer & S. Markantonatou, Eds., Multiword Expressions: Insights from a Multi-lingual Perspective, p. 1–29. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bos, J.
1996Predicate logic unplugged. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof, Eds., Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, p. 133–143. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G.
2004Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti, Ed., Structure and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 3, p. 39–103. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 535–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D.
2000‘The garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation’. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock, Eds., Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, p. 111–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eckardt, R.
2005Too poor to mention: Subminimal events and negative polarity items. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein, Eds., Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, p. 301–330. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
Eckardt, R. & Csipak, E.
2013Minimizers: Towards pragmatic licensing. In E. Csipak, M. Liu, R. Eckardt & M. Sailer, Eds., Beyond “any” and “ever”. New Explorations in Negative Polarity Sensitivity, p. 267–298. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. Y., Bargmann, S. & Sailer, M.
2019Why the butterflies in your stomach can have big wings: combining formal and cognitive theories to explain productive extensions of idioms. Presentation at Europhras 2019, Santiago de Compostella.
Gutzmann, D.
2011Expressive modifiers & mixed expressives. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 8, 123–141. www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss8/
Gutzmann, D. & McCready, E.
2016Quantification with pejoratives. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & H. Wiese, Eds., Pejoration, number 2016 in Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, p. 75–102. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, A. & Koenig, J.-P.
2011Focus particles, secondary meanings, and Lexical Resource Semantics: The case of Japanese shika . In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 81–101. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/2011​/hasegawa​-koenig​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J.
2009The swarm alternation revisited. In E. Hinrichs & J. Nerbonne, Eds., Theory and Evidence in Semantics, p. 53–80. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. & Napoli, D. J.
2019Degree resultatives as second-order constructions. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 31(3), 225–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iordăchioaia, G. & Richter, F.
2015Negative concord with polyadic quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, 607–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L. & Peters, S.
1979Conventional implicature. In C. Oh & D. Dinneen, Eds., Presupposition, volume 11 of Syntax and Semantics, p. 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, M.
1995The semantics and pragmatics of weak and strong polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 25(3–4), 209–257.Google Scholar
Meier, C.
2003The meaning of too, enough, and sothat . Natural Language Semantics, 11(1), 69–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, S.-H., Koenig, J.-P. & Chaves, R. P.
2019A semantic underspecification-based analysis of scope ambiguitites in gapping. In M. Espinal, E. Castroviejo, M. Leonetti, L. McNally & C. Real-Puigdollers, Eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23, volume 2, p. 237–251, Barcelona. https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/Tg3ZGI2M​/SuB23​-twovolume​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Penn, G. & Richter, F.
2005The other syntax: Approaching natural language semantics through logical form composition. In H. Christiansen, P. R. Skadhauge & J. Villadsen, Eds., Constraint Solving and Language Processing. First International Workshop, CSLP 2004, Roskilde, Denmark, September 1–3, 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, volume 3438 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 48–73. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Potts, C.
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, F.
2019Formal background. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. D. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig, Eds., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Chapter 3. Berlin: Language Science Press. Prepublished version. https://​hpsg​.hu​-berlin​.de​/Projects​/HPSG​-handbook​/PDFs​/formal​-background​.pdfGoogle Scholar
[ p. 163 ]
Richter, F. & Sailer, M.
2004Basic concepts of Lexical Resource Semantics. In A. Beckmann & N. Preining, Eds., ESSLLI 2003 – Course Material I, volume 5 of Collegium Logicum, p. 87–143. Vienna: Kurt Gödel Society Wien.Google Scholar
2006Modeling typological markedness in semantics. the case of negative concord. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 305–325. Stanford: CSLI Publications. cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/7​/richter​-sailer​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Richter, F. & Soehn, J.-P.
2006 Braucht niemanden zu scheren: A survey of npi licensing in german. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 421–440. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​web​.stanford​.edu​/group​/cslipublications​/cslipublications​/HPSG​/2006​/richter​-soehn​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rizea, M.-M. & Sailer, M.
2019Representing scales: Degree result clauses and emphatic negative polarity items in romanian. In S. Müller & P. Osenova, Eds., Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 79–99. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/2019​/hpsg2019​-rizea​-sailer​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sailer, M.
2004Local semantics in HPSG. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr, Eds., Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, volume 5, p. 197–214. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss5​/eiss5​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2007NPI licensing, intervention and discourse representation structures in HPSG. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 214–234. Stanford: CSLI Publications. cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/14​/sailer​.pdf
2009On reading-dependent licensing of strong NPIs. In A. Riester & T. Solstad, Eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, volume 5 of SinSpeC. Working Papers of the SFB 732, p. 455–468. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart. https://​ojs​.ub​.uni​-konstanz​.de​/sub​/index​.php​/sub​/article​/view​/565​/511Google Scholar
Sailer, M. & Am-David, A.
2016Definite meaning and definite marking. In D. Arnold, M. Butt, B. Crysmann, T. H. King & S. Müller, Eds., Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, p. 641–661. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/2016​/headlex2016​-sailer​-am​-david​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Soehn, J.-P., Liu, M., Tráwiński, B. & Iordăchioaia, G.
2010Nicht sonderlich oder doch sattsam bekannt? Positive und Negative Polaritätselemente als lexikalische Einheiten mit Distributionsidiosynkrasien. In J. Korhonen, W. Mieder, E. Piirainen & R. Piñel, Eds., EUROPHRAS 2008 Beiträge zur internationalen Phraseologiekonferenz vom 13.–16.8.2008 in Helsinki, p. 273–281, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, J.
2001An approach to polarity sensitivity and negative concord by lexical underspecification. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol, Eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 285–304. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​web​.stanford​.edu​/group​/cslipublications​/cslipublications​/HPSG​/2000​/hpsg00tonhauser​.pdf
Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., Roberts, C. & Simons, M.
2013Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language, 89(1), 66–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Wouden, T.
1997Negative Contexts. Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar