Article published in:
Interfaces in Romance: A constraint-based approach
Edited by Gabriela Bîlbîie
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43:1] 2020
► pp. 2361
References

References

Abeillé, A. & Godard, D.
1996La complémentation des auxiliaires français. Langages, 30(122), 32–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000aFrench word order and lexical weight. In R. D. Borsley, Ed., The Nature and Function of Syntactic categories, Syntax and semantics, p. 325–360. New York: Academic Press, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000bVarieties of ESSE in Romance languages. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol, Eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of California, Berkeley, 22–23 July, 2000, p. 2–22, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002The syntactic structure of French auxiliaries. Language, 78(3), 404–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Miller, P.
1997Les causatives en français : un cas de compétition syntaxique. Langue française, p. 62–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D., Miller, P. & Sag, I. A.
1998aFrench bounded dependencies. In L. Dini & S. Balari, Eds., Romance in HPSG, p. 1–54. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Sag, I.
1998bTwo kinds of composition in French complex predicates. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol & T. Nakazawa, Eds., Complex Predicates in Nonderivational Syntax, p. 1–41. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F. & Stump, G. T.
2004Paradigms and periphrastic expression. In L. Sadler & A. Spencer, Eds., Projecting Morphology, p. 111–157. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F. & Webelhuth, G.
1998A theory of predicates. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Aguila-Multner, G.
2018L’affixation pronominale sur l’auxiliaire comme exponence périphrastique. Master’s thesis, Université Paris Diderot.Google Scholar
Aguila-Multner, G. & Crysmann, B.
2019Infinitival passives and pseudo-relatives in French: a raising account. Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris (CSSP) 2–4 October, Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
2020Clitic climbing in French complex predicates: a periphrasis account. 27th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. 17–19 August, Seattle/Berlin.
Bender, E. M., Flickinger, D. & Oepen, S.
2002The Grammar Matrix: An open-source starter-kit for the rapid development of cross-linguistically consistent broad-coverage precision grammars. In J. Carroll, N. Oostdijk & R. Sutcliffe, Eds., Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation at the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, p. 8–14.Google Scholar
Bonami, O.
2015Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology, 25(1), 63–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 59 ]
Bonami, O. & Boyé, G.
2002Suppletion and dependency in inflectional morphology. In The Proceedings of the HPSG’01 Conference, p. 51–70. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2007French pronominal clitics and the design of Paradigm Function Morphology. In Proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, p. 291–322.Google Scholar
Bonami, O., Godard, D. & Kampers-Manhe, B.
2004Adverb classification. In F. Corblin & H. De Swart, Eds., Handbook of French semantics, p. 143–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Webelhuth, G.
2013The phrase-structural diversity of periphrasis: a lexicalist account. In M. Chumakina & G. G. Corbett, Eds., Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms, p. 141–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, K., Vincent, N. & Chapman, C.
1997Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection: a feature-based account. In G. Booij & J. van Marle, Eds., Yearbook of Morphology 1996, p. 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, G., Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A.
2001Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(1), 1–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Chumakina, M., Corbett, G. G., Popova, G. & Spencer, A.
2012Defining ‘periphrasis’: key notions. Morphology, 22, 233–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calder, J.
1989Paradigmatic morphology. In Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), p. 58–65, Manchester: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Copestake, A.
2002Implementing typed feature structure grammars, volume 110. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Copestake, A. A. & Flickinger, D.
2000An open source grammar development environment and broad-coverage English grammar using HPSG. In Proceedings LREC 2000, Athens: ELRA/ELDA.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.
2006Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crysmann, B. & Bonami, O.
2013French pronominal affixes: a challenge for theories of morphotactics. In Second American International Morphology Meeting, San Diego.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., Maxwell III J. T. & Zaenen, A.
1990Modeling syntactic constraints on anaphoric binding. In Proceedings of COLING-90, p. 72–76.Google Scholar
Erbach, G.
1992Head-driven lexical representation of idioms in HPSG. In E.-J. v. d. L. Martin Everaert, A. Schenk & R. Schreuder, Eds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Idioms, Tilburg, The Netherlands: ITK.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, A., Bernardini, S., Picci, G. & Baroni, M.
2013frWaC.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, J. & Sag, I. A.
2000Interrogative Investigations. The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Haider, H.
1984Was zu haben ist und was zu sein hat. Papiere zur Linguistik, 30, 23–36.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, E. & Nakazawa, T.
1990Subcategorization and VP structure in German. In S. Hughes & J. Salmons, Eds., Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Germanic Linguistics, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
1977Syntaxe du français : le cycle transformationnel. Ed. du Seuil.Google Scholar
Koenig, J.-P.
1998Inside-out constraints and description languages for HPSG. In A. Kathol, J.-P. Koenig & G. Webelhuth, Eds., Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation, Studies in Constraint-based Lexicalism, p. 265–279. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
[ p. 60 ]
Manning, C. D.
1997Romance complex predicates: In defence of the right-branching structure. Ms., University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Miller, P. H.
1992Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar. Garland, New York.Google Scholar
Miller, P. H. & Sag, I. A.
1997French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
1994Head-driven phrase structure grammar. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richter, F. & Sailer, M.
2010Phraseological clauses in constructional hpsg. In Proceedings of HPSG 2009, p. 297–317, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sadler, L. & Spencer, A.
2001Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In Yearbook of Morphology 2000, p. 71–96. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sag, I. A.
1997English relative clause constructions. Journal of linguistics, 33(2), 431–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Remarks on locality. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of HPSG 2007, p. 394–414, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2012Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. Boas & I. A. Sag, Eds., Sign-Based Construction Grammar, p. 69–202. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Soehn, J.-P.
2006Über Bärendienste und erstaunte Bauklötze – Idiome ohne freie Lesart in der HPSG. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Soehn, J.-P. & Sailer, M.
2003At first blush on tenterhooks. about selectional restrictions imposed by nonheads. In Proceedings of FGVienna The 8th Conference on Formal Grammar, p. 149–161.Google Scholar
Spencer, A.
2003Periphrastic paradigms in Bulgarian. In U. Junghanns & L. Szucsich, Eds., Syntactic structures and morphological information, p. 249–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stump, G.
1980An inflectional approach to French clitics. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 24, 1–54.Google Scholar
Štichauer, P.
2019Mixed paradigms in Italo-Romance: a case of morphologization of auxiliary selection? In S. Cruschina, A. Ledgeway & E.-M. Remberger, Eds., Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces, p. 79–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H., Vet, C., Borillo, A., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., Molendijk, A., de Swart, H., Vetters, C. & Vieu, L.
2004Tense and aspect in sentences. In F. Corblin & H. De Swart, Eds., Handbook of French semantics, p. 233–270. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. & Pullum, G. K.
1983Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language, p. 502–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 61 ]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Winckel, Elodie & Anne Abeillé
2020. French subject island constraint?. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.