Introduction published in:
Interfaces in Romance: A constraint-based approach
Edited by Gabriela Bîlbîie
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43:1] 2020
► pp. 122
References

References

Abeillé, A.
2003A Lexicon-and Construction-Based Approach to Coordinations. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the HPSG’03 Conference, 5–25. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2005Les syntagmes conjoints et leurs fonctions syntaxiques. Langages, 160, 42–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Les grammaires d’unification. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Godard, D.
1994The Complementation of French Auxiliaries. In R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss & M. Senturia, Eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1997The Syntax of French Negative Adverbs. In P. Hirschbuhler & F. Marineau, Eds., Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 17 ]
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Sag, I. A.
1998Two Kinds of Composition in French Complex Predicates. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol & T. Nakazawa, Eds, Complex Predicates in Nonderivational Syntax, 1–41. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Godard, D.
2001Varieties of ESSE in Romance languages. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol, Eds., The Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 2–22. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002The Syntactic Structure of French Auxiliaries. Language, 78(3), 404–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Les prédicats complexes dans les langues romanes. In D. Godard, Ed., Les langues romanes. Problèmes de la phrase simple, 125–184. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Borsley, R. & Espinal, M.-T.
2006The syntax of Comparative Correlatives in French and Spanish. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 6–26. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Sabio, F.
2008Two types of NP preposing in French. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 306–324. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Bîlbîie, G. & Mouret, F.
2014A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In H. Boas & F. Gonzálvez-García, Eds., Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar, 227–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Chrysmann, B. & Shiraishi, A.
2016Syntactic Mismatch in French Peripheral Ellipsis. In C. Piñón, Ed., Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 11, 1–30. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Borsley, B.
2020The basic properties and elements of HPSG. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig, Eds., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Hemforth, B., Winckel, E. & Gibson, E.
2020Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
An, Aixiu & Abeillé, A.
2019Number agreement in French binomials. In C. Piñón, Ed., Empirical Issues in Syntax and semantics 12, 31–60. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Balari, S. & Dini, L.
1997Romance in HPSG. CSLI Lecture Notes, number 75. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, G.
2008A Syntactic Account of Romanian Correlative Coordination from a Romance Perspective. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 25–45. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2017Grammaire des constructions elliptiques: Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, G. & Laurens, F.
2009A Construction-based Analysis of Verbless Relative Adjuncts in French and Romanian. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 5–25. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bouma, G., Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A.
2001Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(1), 1–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Mchombo, S.
1995The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 181–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I. & Wechsler, S.
2015Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 18 ]
Castroviejo, E., Fernádez-Soriano, O. & Pérez-Jiménez, I.
2017Introduction. Boundaries, phases and interfaces. In O. Fernádez-Soriano, E. Castroviejo & I. Pérez-Jiménez, Eds., Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces, 2–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
2005Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction. Research on Language and Computation, 3(4), 281–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.
1975Montague’s Semantic Theory and Transformational Grammar. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Crysmann, B.
1999Licensing Proclisis in European Portuguese. In F. Corblin, J.-M. Marandin & C. Dobrovie-Sorin, Eds., Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics. Selected papers from the Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique de Paris (CSSP 1997), 255–276. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
2002Constraint-Based Coanalysis: Portuguese Cliticisation and Morphology-Syntax Interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, number 15. Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
2020Morphology. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig, Eds., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Chapter 21. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P.
1999Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Kuthy, K.
2002Discontinuous NPs in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
de Swart, H. & Sag, I. A.
2002Negation and Negative Concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(4), 373–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, E. & Vallduví, E.
1996Information Packaging in HPSG. In C. Grover & E. Vallduví, Eds., Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science, Vol. 12: Studies in HPSG, 1–32. Scotland: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fischer, S.
2010Word-Order Change as a Source of Grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. & Gabriel, C.
2016Grammatical interfaces in Romance languages: An introduction. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel, Eds., Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 1–20. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, R., Sevdali, C. & Truswell, R.
2015Introduction. In R. Folli, C. Sevdali & R. Truswell, Eds., Syntax and its Limits, 1–15. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. & Fedorenko, E.
2013The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognition Processes, 28, 88–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, J. & Sag, I. A.
2000Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives, vol. 123. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Godard, D. & Marandin, J.-M.
2006Reinforcing Negation: the Case of Italian. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 174–194. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
[ p. 19 ]
Green, G.
2011Modelling Grammar Growth: Universal Grammar without Innate Principles of Parameters. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 378–403. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.
2007aDeriving dynamic interfaces. Linguistic Analysis, 33, 3–19.Google Scholar
2007bSpelling out dynamic interfaces. Linguistic Analysis, 33, 197–208.Google Scholar
2009Phases and Interfaces. In K. Grohmann, Ed., InterPhases. Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, 1–22. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ionescu, E.
2004Understanding Romanian Negation. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, G.
2010Negative Concord with Negative Quantifiers: A Polyadic Quantifier Approach to Romanian Negative Concord. PhD Dissertation, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, G. & Richter, F.
2009Negative Concord in Romanian as Polyadic Quantification. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 150–170. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2015Negative Concord with Polyadic Quantifiers. The Case of Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(2), 607–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. & Zaenen, A.
1989Long-distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure and Functional Uncertainty. In M. Baltin & A. Kroch, Eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, 17–42. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kathol, A., Przepiórkowski, A. & J. Tseng
2011Advanced Topics in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 54–111. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B.
1977Noun Phrase Acceptability and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B. & Sag, I. A.
2002Negation without Verb-Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 339–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, T. & Alexiadou, A.
2015Syntax – The State of a Controversial Art. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 1, 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Jonas
1996An Underspecified HPSG Representation for Information Structure. In J. Tsuji, Ed., Proceedings of Coling-96. 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96), 670–675. Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kuhn, J.
2007Interfaces in Constraint-Based Theories of Grammar. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 613–650. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. & Copestake, A.
1999Default Representation in Constraint-Based Frameworks. Computational Linguistics, 25(1), 55–105.Google Scholar
Meurers, W. D.
2001On Expressing Lexical Generalizations in HPSG. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), 161–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. & Sag, I. A.
1997French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monachesi, P.
1997Decomposing Italian Clitics. In S. Balari & L. Dini, Eds., Romance in HPSG, 305–357. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
[ p. 20 ]
1998aItalian Restructuring Verbs: A Lexical Analysis. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol & T. Nakazawa, Eds, Complex predicates in Nonderivational Syntax, 313–368. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1998bThe morphosyntax of Romanian cliticization. In P. Coppen, H. Van Halteren & L. Tennissen, Eds., Proceedings of Computational Linguistics in The Netherlands 1997, 99–118. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1999aA lexical approach to Italian cliticization. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1999bOn certain properties of Romanian auxiliary (and modal) verbs. In G. Bouma, E. Hinrichs, G.-J. Kruijff & R. Oehrle, Eds., Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics, 99–115. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2000Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex. In B. Gerlach & J. Grijzenhout, Eds., Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, 255–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005The verbal complex in Romance: a case study in grammatical interfaces. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mouret, F.
2005La syntaxe des coordinations correlatives du français. Langages, 160, 67–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006A Phrase Structure Approach to Argument Cluster Coordination. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 247–267. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2007Grammaire des constructions coordonnées. Coordinations simples et coordinations à redoublement en français contemporain. PhD Dissertation, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Müller, S.
2015HPSG – A Synopsis. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 2, 937–973. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2018Grammatical theory. From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Müller, S. & Machicao y Priemer, A.
2019Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In A. Kertész, E. Moravcsik & C. Rákosi, Eds., Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, 317–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S., Abeillé, A., Borsley, R. & Koenig, J.-P.
Eds. 2020Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Mycock, L.
2015Syntax and its interfaces: an overview. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 1, 24–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Norcliffe, E.
2007Constructing Spanish Complex Predicates. In S. Müller, Ed, The Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 194–213. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pollard, C.
1996On head non-movement. In H. Bunt & A. van Horck, Eds., Discontinuous Constituency, 279–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
1987Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes, No. 13. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 21 ]
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P.
2004Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A.
1999Negative Polarity Questions and Italian Negative Concord. In V. Kordoni, Ed., Tübingen Studies in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 353–400. Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, number 132. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Pullum, G.
1977Word Order Universals and Grammatical Relations. In P. Cole & J. Sadock, Eds., Grammatical Relations, 249–277. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. & Scholz, B.
2001On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks. In P. de Groote, G. Morill & C. Retoré, Eds., Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference, 17–43. Berlin: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C.
2007Introduction. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 1–13. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richter, F. & M. Sailer
1999A lexicalist collocation analysis of sentential negation and negative concord in French. In V. Kordoni, Ed., Tübingen Studies in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 231–300. Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, number 132. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Richter, F. & Sailer, M.
2004Basic Concepts of Lexical Resource Semantics. In A. Beckmann & N. Preining, Eds., ESSLLI 2003 – Course Material I, volume 5 of Collegium Logicum, 87–143. Vienna: Kurt Gödel Society Wien.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A.
1997English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 431–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis. In H. Boas & I. A. Sag, Eds., Sign-based Construction Grammar, 69–202. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A. & Wasow, T.
2011Performance-Compatible Competence Grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 359–377. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sag, I. A., Wasow, T. & Bender, E.
2003Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shieber, S.
1986An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, A., Abeillé, A. & Hemforth, B.
2019Verbal mismatch in Right-Node Raising. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), 114. 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
2011Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K. & Sedivy, J.
1996Using Eye Movements to Study Spoken Language Comprehension: Evidence for Visually Mediated Incremental Interpretation. In T. Inui & J. McClelland, Eds., Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, 457–478. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H.
1984Introductory remarks. In W. de Geest & Y. Putseys, Eds., Sentential Complementation, 1–9. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 22 ]
Villavicencio, A., Sadler, L. & Arnold, D.
2005An HPSG Account of Closest Conjunct Agreement in NP Coordination in Portuguese. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 427–447. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar