Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext

| University of Zimbabwe
| University of Belgrade
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027234124 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027267351 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
The volume presents Louw's Contextual Prosodic Theory from its beginnings to its newest applications. It journeys from delexicalisation and relexicalisation into Semantic Prosody and then to the heart of its contextual requirements within collocation and the thinking of J.R. Firth. Once there, it moves much of Firth’s and Malinowski’s thinking into a computational method based upon the ability of language to govern and analyse itself using collocation to plot its scope and limits. With the assistance of analytic philosophy, it parts logic (grammar) from metaphysics (vocabulary) along the lines of a non-computational formula of Bertrand Russell, and so falsifies the major premise of the Vienna Circle using its own central tenet: the Principle of Verification. Having arrived at corpus-derived subtext (the semantic aura of grammar strings, as distinguished from Semantic Prosody), the second half of the book proceeds to verify the theory on Slavic languages. The focus is on the poet Alexander Pushkin, whose authorial intention becomes computationally recoverable. Prose is handled on samples authored by David Lodge, where authorial (in)sincerity (Louw 1993) is viewed on a cline of inspiration and quality of discourse. Other applications in the volume include studies on translation, negotiation, humour, and the reception of CPT.
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 23]  2016.  xix, 419 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.23
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
xi–xii
Foreword
xiii–xx
Part I. Theoretical considerations from the beginnings to the present day
Chapter 1. Delexicalisation, relexicalisation and classroom application
1–34
Chapter 2. Collocation, interpretation, and context of situation
35–74
Chapter 3. Semantic prosodies, irony, insincerity and literary analysis
75–110
Chapter 4. Data-Assisted Negotiating
111–130
Chapter 5. The analysis and creation of humour
131–154
Chapter 6. Events in the context of culture, language events, subtext
155–192
Part II. New applications
Chapter 7. Alexander Pushkin and authorial intention
195–240
Chapter 8. Translating Pushkin: A case in point
241–272
Chapter 9. Inspiration and Authorial (In)sincerity
273–310
Chapter 10. Two case studies of inspired writing
311–336
Chapter 11. Contextual Prosodic Theory in the stylistics classroom
337–358
Chapter 12. Student-centred stylistics: Does subtext read text?
359–388
References
389–398
Appendix
399–414
Index
415–420
“The term corpus stylistics, usually regarded as a near-synonym for stylometry, stylometrics, statistical stylistics, or stylogenetics, is closely related to statistics and corpus linguistics. Despite an increasing number of studies in the field, people still do not attain a clear line of demarcation between corpus linguistics and corpus stylistics. Corpus linguists are typically concerned with “repeated occurrences, generalizations and the description of typical patterns,” while corpus stylistic studies relate to “deviations from linguistic norms that account for the artistic effects of a particular text” (Mahlberg, “Corpus Stylistic Perspective” 19). However, more needs to be known about what new perspectives corpus linguistics can offer to the depiction of stylistic devices and the interpretation of stylistic values. Under these circumstances, Bill Louw and Marija Milojkovic’s Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext is instructive and worthy of reading, for it offers valuable perspectives for interdisciplinary investigations.”
References

References

Abrams, M.H.
1971 A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K.
(ed.) 2009 Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ②
Almond, B.
1988 The Philosophical Quest. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1962 How to do Things with Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J.. et al.
1956 The Revolution in Philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J.
1968 The Origins of Pragmatism. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., Francis, G. & Tognini-Bonelli, E.
(eds) 1993 Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnbrook, G.
2002 Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnbrook, G. & Sinclair, J.M.
2001 Specialised corpus, local and functional grammars. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R.L. Roseberry (eds), 237-276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazell, C.E., Catford, J.C., Halliday, M.A.K. & Robins, R.H.
(eds) 1966 In Memory of J.R. Firth. London: Longman.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, R.
1991 Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boulton, A.
2009 Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. Re-Call 21(1): 37-51.Google Scholar
Braun, S., Kohn K. & Mukherjee J.
(eds) 2006 Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy, 25-47. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burke, M.
(2004) Cognitive stylistics in the classroom. Style 38(4): 491-510.Google Scholar
Burke, M, Csabi, S., Week, L. & Zerkowitz, J.
(eds) 2012 Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R.
1928 Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis Verlag.Google Scholar
1928 The Logical Structure of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1950 The Logical Foundation of Probability. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap R.
1988 Meaning and Necessity [Midway Reprint]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R.A.
(ed.) 1982 Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Carter, R.A. & Burton, D.
(eds) 1981 Literary Text and Language Study: An Approach to Language and Literature in the Classroom. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
2004 Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castairs-McCarthy A.
2005 Morpheme and word. In Handbook of Word-Formation, P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (eds), 10-20. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chapman, L.J.
1983 Reading Development and Cohesion. Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. & Clark B.
(eds) 2014 Pragmatic Literary Stylistics. Houndmills: Palgrave McMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S. & Routledge, C.
(eds) 2005 Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Chiaro, D.
1992 The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P.
2009 Text linguistics. In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, J. Culpeper, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak & T. McEnery (eds), 170-186. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B.
2014 Pragmatics and inference. In The Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whitely (eds), 300-314. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuddon, J.A.
1985 A Dictionary of Literary Terms. Harmonsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
2004- BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc/>Google Scholar
2008- The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words, 1990-present. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/>Google Scholar
2011- Google Books Corpus. (Based on Google Books n-grams). http://​googlebooks​.byu​.edu/>Google Scholar
Deignan, A.
1995 Cobuild English Guides, 7: Metaphor. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
2005 Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S.
2010 Getting More: How to Negotiate to Achieve Your Goals in the Real World. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E.
1924 The Complete poems of Emily Dickinson. Boston MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Dummett, M.
1975[1981] Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1976 Is logic empirical? In Contemporary British Philosophy [Fourth Series], H.D. Lewis (ed.), 41-64. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1991 Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1996 Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dummet, M.
2003 Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ellenbogen, S.
2003 Wittgenstein's Account of Truth. New York NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fechner, G.T.
1876 Vorschule der Aesthetik. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fenton, J.
(ed.) 2008 D.H. Lawrence: Selected Poems. New York NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R.
1957 Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1964[1937] In The Tongues of Men and Speech, P. Strevens (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fischer-Starcke, B.
2010 Corpus Linguistics in literary Analysis: Jane Austen and her Contemporaries. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Paton, B.
2011 Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreements Without Giving in. New York NY: Penguin Books. Revised edition of Fisher, R. & Ury, W. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreements Without Giving in. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
2012 Corpora and Language Education. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J.A.
(ed.) 1996 J.M. Sinclair on Lexis and Lexicography. Singapore: UniPress.Google Scholar
Frege, G.
1884 Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Section VII, translated by M. Beaney in The Frege Reader 1997. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freire, P. & Macedo, D.
1987 Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. South Hadley MA: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Frost, R.
1939 Collected Poems of Robert Frost. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Gavins, J.
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J.
1996 A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, E.B.
2013 Sensation and Perception. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Grayling, A.C.
1988 Wittgenstein. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 The Mystery of Things. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Greene, G.
1971 Travels with My Aunt. New York NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), 113-127. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guttenplan, S.
2005 Objects of Metaphor. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I.
1975 Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., Teubert, W., Yallop, C. & Cermakova A.
2004 Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1980 Context of situation. Sophia Linguistica 6: 4-15.Google Scholar
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O.
1999 Ayer [The Great Philosophers 2]. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
1985 Meaning, context and text: Fifty years after Malinowski. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vols. 1-2 [Advances in Discourse Processes 16], J.D. Benson & W.S. Greaves (eds). Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Heaton, J. & Groves, G.
2005 Introducing Wittgenstein. Royston: Icon Books.Google Scholar
Heller, R. & Hindle, T.
2008 Essential Manager's Manual. London: Dorking Kindersley. Revised version of the 1998 edn.Google Scholar
Herbst, T., Faulhaber, S. & Uhrig, P.
(eds) 2011 The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, T.
1998 Essential Managers: Negotiating Skills. London: Dorking Kindersley.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hori, M.
2004 Investigating Dickens' Style: A Collocational Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hough, G.
1956 The Dark Sun: A Study of D.H. Lawrence. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Householder, F.W. Jr
1952 Review of Harris, Z. S., ‘Methods in Structural Linguistics’. International Journal of American Linguistics 18: 260-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R.A.
2001 Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Thompson, G.
2000 Evaluation in Text. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Sinclair J. McH
2000 A local grammar of evaluation. In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and Construction in Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 74-102. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L.
1996 ‘What makes language into art? In Using English: from Conversation to Canon. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D.
2010 Stylistics [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S.
2009 Some thoughts on corpora and second language acquisition. In Aijmer (ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching, 33-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T.
1991 Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds). Special issue of English Language Research Journal 4: 1-16.Google Scholar
(1994) From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, T. Odlin (ed.), 293-313. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corpus of the 1995 edition of the Times newspaper.
Jones, L.
2001 New Progress to Proficiency. Student’s Book. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Joseph, J., Love, N. & Taylor, T.
2001 Landmarks in Linguistic Thought, II: The Western Tradition in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kitcher P.
1993 The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
1987 Aspects of English collocations. In Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, W. Meijs (ed.), 133-141. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Knowles, M. & Moon, R.
2006 Introducing Metaphor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladyman, J.
2002 Understanding the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980[2003] Metaphors we Live by. Chicago IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Landini, G.
2011 Russell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leavis, F.R.
1932[1950] New Bearings in English Poetry. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
1936[1972]. Revaluation. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Lee, A. & Poynton, C.
2000 Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lodge, D.
1975 Changing Places. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
1984 Small World. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
2000 Thinks. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Longman
2001 Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Lombard, L.B.
1998 Ontologies of events. In Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics, S. Laurence & C. Macdonald (eds), 277-295. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Louw, W.E.
1989 Sub-routines in the integration of language and literature. In Literature and the Learner: Methodological Approaches [British Council ELT Documents 130], R.A. Carter & R. Walker (eds), 47-54. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
1991 Classroom concordancing of delexical forms and the case for integrating language and literature. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds). Special issue of English Language Research Journal 4: 151-178.Google Scholar
1993 Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 152-176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 The role of corpora in critical literary appreciation. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2000 Contextual Prosodic Theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Words in Context. In Honour of John Sinclair, C. Heffer & H. Sauntson (eds.). Birmingham: ELR. http://​www​.revue​-texto​.net​/docannexe​/file​/124​/louw​_prosodie​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2003 Dressing up waiver: A stochastic collocational reading of ‘The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’. Bologna: Occasional Papers dei Quaderni del CeSLIC. http://​www​.lingue​.unibo​.it​/ceslic​/e​_occ​_papers​.htm_Google Scholar
2006a Corpus Approaches to the Language of Literature. Collocation, Corpora and Criticism [ADHS Literature, Languages and Linguistics]. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
2006b Turning the tables: An indigenous view on civilisation. Closing Keynote Presentation at Convegno Primitivismo , Bologna, Italy. November 2005.
2007a Truth, literary worlds and devices as collocation. In Corpora in Foreign Language Classroom, E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda & J. Santana (eds), 329-362. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b Collocation as the determinant of verbal art. In Verbal Art Re-Visited, D. Miller & M. Turci (eds), 149-181. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2008 Consolidating empirical method in data-assisted stylistics: Towards a corpus-attested glossary of literary terms. In Directions in Empirical Literary Studies. In Honour of Willie van Peer [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 5], S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova & J. Auracher (eds), 243-264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies for Humanities Studies, W. van Peer, V. Viana & S. Zyngier (eds), 79-101. Hershey PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Automating the extraction of literary worlds and their subtexts from the poetry of William Butler Yeats. In Para por y sobre Luis Quereda, M. Falces Sierra, E. Hidalgo Tenorio, J. Santana Lario & S. Valera Hernández (eds). Granada: Granada University Press.Google Scholar
2011 Philosophical and literary concerns in corpus linguistics. In Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 48], V. Viana, S. Zyngier & G. Barnbrook (eds),171-196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Teaching literary engagement from the index of first lines: A corpus-based subtextual approach. In Магия ИННО: новые технологии в языковой подготовке специалистов-международников. Mатериалы научно-практической конференции к 70-летию факультета международных отношений (Proceedings of the International Conference ’The Magic of Innovation: New Techniques and Technologies in Teaching Foreign Languages), Vol. 1, Sections 1-3, D. Kryachkov (ed.), 340-344. Moscow: Moscow State University of International Relations MGIMO.Google Scholar
Louw, W.E. & Milojkovic M.
2014 Semantic prosody. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 263-280. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Shared logical form or shared metaphysics: In search of corpus-derived empathy in stylistics. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 198, 535-545. Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magee, B.
1978 Men of Ideas: Some Creators of Contemporary Philosophy. BBC: London.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
2013 Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B.
1923 The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In The Meaning of Meaning, Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards (eds), 296-336. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1935 Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Martinich, A.P.
1985 The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mautner, P.
2000 The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy. Harmonsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McCabe, B.
(ed.) 1999 All I Ever Wrote: The Complete Works of Ronnie Barker. London: Essential Books.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F.
2002 English Idioms in Use. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A.
2012 Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M.
1969 Counterblast. London: Rapp and Whiting.Google Scholar
Mercer, N.
2000 Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H.
1967 Tropic of Capricorn. London: Panther Books.Google Scholar
Milojkovic, M.
2011a Semantic prosody and subtext as universal, collocation-based instrumentation for meaning and literary worlds. In Труды международной конференции «Корпусная лингвистика – 2011 (Proceeings of the International Conference ‘Corpus Linguistics – 2011), V.P. Zakharov, et al. (eds), 47-52. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
2011b Quenched light, or seeing through a glass darkly – A collocation-based view of Larkin's atheism and depression. In Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies, Vol. 3, Zoran Paunović (ed.), 127-144. Belgrade: Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade. www​.belgrade​.bells​.fil​.bg​.ac​.rs​/Bells3​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2012 Time and transitions in Larkin’s poetry. NAWA: Journal of Language and Communication 6(1): 102-126. A version of this paper is available as part of Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA) http://​www​.pala​.ac​.uk​/resources​/proceedings​/2011​/milojkovic2011​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2013 Is corpus stylistics bent on self-improvement? The role of reference corpora 20 years after the advent of semantic prosody. Journal of Literary Semantics 42(1): 59-78 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milojkovic, M. & Louw, W.E.
2016 Towards a corpus-attested definition of creativity as accessed through a subtextual analysis of student writing. In Key Competences in English Medium Higher Education, W.R. Breeze & C. Sancho Guinda (eds). Springer.Google Scholar
Moon, R.E.
1998 Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mungoshi, C.
1975 Waiting for the Rain [African Writers Series]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nash, W.
1985 The Language of Humour. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Nowottny W.
1962 The Language Poets Use. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Norgaard, N., Busse, B. & Montoro, R.
(eds) 2010 Key Terms in Stylistics. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G.
1995 Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12: 1-43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R. & Local, J.
1994 Disentangling autosegments from prosodies: A note on the misrepresentation of a research tradition in phonology. Journal of Linguistics 30: 477-498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O'Halloran, K.
2007 Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics 28(1): 1-24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olohan, M.
2004 Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English
2003 Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R.
(ed.) 1968 Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952-1959. Longman: London.Google Scholar
1976[1981] Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pears, D.
1971 Wittgenstein. London: Fontana Collins.Google Scholar
1987 The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy, Vol.1. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G.
2011 Colouring Meaning. Collocation and Connotation in Figurative Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plath, S.
1981 Collected Poems. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Popper, K.
1935[1963] Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R.
1935[2002] The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995 A World of Propensities. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.
1951 Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View, 20-44. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Recanati, F.
2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Reeves, J.
1988 Selected Poems of G.M. Hopkins. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M.
1978 Semiotics of Poetry. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Robins, R.H.
2009 Malinowski, Firth and the ‘context of situation’. In Social Anthropology and Language, E. Ardener (ed.), 33-47. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. & Groves, J.
2002 Introducing Bertrand Russell. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
2009 Corpus research and practice. In Aijmer (ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching, 83-98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B.
1912 The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate; New York NY: Henry Holt and Company. Repr. Oxford: OUP, 1997.Google Scholar
1948 Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
1956 Bertrand Russell: A Collection of Critical Essays, D. Pears (ed.). New York NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1960 Bertrand Russell Speaks his Mind. London: Arthur Baker.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. & McCarthy, D.
(eds) 2005 Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R.
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senft, G.
2007 Bronislaw Malinowski and linguistic pragmatics. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 3(1): 79-96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, R.
2012 The Science Delusion. London: Coronet.Google Scholar
Shimamura, A.P. & Palmer, S.E.
2012 Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Simpson, P.
2003 On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Stylistics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
1966 Taking a poem to pieces. In Essays on Style and Language: Linguistic and Critical Approaches to Literary Style, R. Fowler (ed.), 129-142. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
1981 The integration of language and literature in the English curriculum. In Literary Text and Language Study: An Approach to Language and Literature in the Classroom, R.A. Carter & D. Burton (eds). London: Edward Arno1d.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.. et al.
1987[1993] Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & Renouf A.J.
1987 A lexical syllabus for language learning. In Vocabulary in Language Teaching, M.J. McCarthy & R.A. Carter (eds), 140-160. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
(ed.) 1987 Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing and the Development of the Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. London: Collins ELT.Google Scholar
1988 Naturalness in language. ELR Journal 2: 11-20.Google Scholar
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1995 Collocation on CD-ROM. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
2003 Reading Concordances. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2004 Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M., Jones S. & Daley R.
2004 English Collocation Studies: The OSTI report, R. Krishnamurthy (ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
2006 Phrasebite. Pescia: TWC.Google Scholar
2007 Defining the definiendum. In A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis. A Festschrift for Patrick Hanks, G.-M. de Schryver (ed.), 37-47. Ghent: Menha.Google Scholar
Stewart, D.
2010 Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2002 Cognitive Poetics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
2001 Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teubert, W.
2010 Our brave new world? In The Bootcamp Discourse and Beyond. Special issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(3): 354-358.Google Scholar
2010 Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Open University Course P670
1983 The Effective Manager. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
(eds) 2006 System and Corpus: Exploring Connections. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Thwaite, A.
(ed.) 2003 Collected Poems: Philip Larkin. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Tibballs, G.
(ed.) 2011 The Mammoth Book of Really Silly Jokes. London: Constable and Robinson.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E.
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M.
2009 Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistic Approach [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turney, P.D. & Pantel, P.
2010 From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37: 141-188.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W.F.
1935[1957] On defining the phoneme. In Readings in Linguistics, 1, M. Joos (ed.). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verdonk, P.
2013 The Stylistics of Poetry. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vincent, P.
1977 The Two Ronnies - But First the News. London: Star.Google Scholar
Xiao, R. & McEnery, T.
2006 Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics 27(1): 103-129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waismann, F.
1951  Verifiability . In Logic and Language [First Series], A.G.N. Flew (ed.), 117-144. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walker, R.
1983 Language for Literature: A Guide to Language Use, Style and Criticism. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Warren, M.
2006 Features of Naturalness in Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 152]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. & Zyngier, S.
(eds) 2007 Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners: Theory and Practice. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitsitt, S.
2005 A critique of the concept of semantic prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(3): 283-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.
2010 Many rooms with corpora. In The Bootcamp Discourse and Beyond. Special Issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(3): 400-407.Google Scholar
Williams, J.
2005 Malinowski. In Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, S. Chapman & C. Routledge (eds), 186-187. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1914[1969] Notes on logic. In Notebooks, 1914-1916, G.E.M. Anscombe (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1922[1960] Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, transl. D.F. Pears & D.F. McGuiness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1929 Some remarks on logical form. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , Suppl. Vol. 9, 162-171.
2005 Philosophical Investigations, transl. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S.
2006 Stylistics: Pedagogical applications. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 12, Keith Brown (Ed. in Chief). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Language, Discourse, Style [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 22], Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Intertextuality in Practice [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 33], Crossref logo
Auer, Anita, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson & Violeta Sotirova
2016.  In Linguistics and Literary History [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 25], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cloutier, Robert, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Radosław Święciński, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Alexander Kautzsch, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise & Jessica Norledge
2018. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies 97:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Louw, Bill
2020.  In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo
McIntyre, Dan
2018.  In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Milojkovic, Marija
2020. Is the truthfulness of a proposition verifiable through access to reference corpora?. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:2 ► pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Milojkovic, Marija & Bill Louw
2017.  In Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 27], ► pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia
2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 54:2 ► pp. 512 ff. Crossref logo
Toolan, Michael
2018.  In A Companion to Literary Theory, ► pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Hong
2020. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods. English in Education ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
2018.  In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87], ► pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Linguistics

Discourse studies
Writing and literacy
Corpus linguistics
Functional linguistics
Pragmatics

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015043433 | Marc record