Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 3:4 (2013) ► pp. 448477
References

References

Agresti, A.
(2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd edition). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P.
(2006) Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 231–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barry, A. S.
(2007) The form, function and distribution of high rising intonation in Southern Californian and Southern British English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Beach, C. M., Katz, W. F., & Skowronski, A.
(1996) Children’s processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1148–1160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
(2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.21) [Computer program]. Retrieved from: <http://www.praat.org/> (15 December 2009)Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E.
(1990a) Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990b) Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners. In J. Leather and A. James (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-language Speech (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cardoso, W.
(2011) The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. Second Language Research, 27, 433–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L.
(2000) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989–999.[ p. 472 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A.
(2009) Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3522–2525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W.
(1997) Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40, 141–201.Google Scholar
Daly, N., & Warren, P.
(2001) Pitching it differently in New Zealand English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 85–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P.
(1965) Comparing the phonetic features of English, German, Spanish, and French. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
(1968) A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4, 183–198.Google Scholar
de Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T.
(2009) Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 385–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. A.
(2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings from the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Fultz, A. L., & Petrusch, R. A.
(2008) Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 453–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J.
(2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enomoto, A.
(2007) Perception of short English sentences by Japanese learners of English: A gating study. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 11, 151–167.Google Scholar
Face, T. L.
(2005) F0 peak height and the perception of sentence type in Castilian Spanish. Revista Internacional De Linguistica Iberoamericana, 3, 49–65. Exploring the use oGoogle Scholar
Féry, C.
(1993) German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, J.
(2008) Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 36, 35–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.S., & Jang, S.
(1997) Effects of perception on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fultz, A.
(2007) Prosody in syntactic disambiguation in English-French interlanguage. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 32, 394–405.Google Scholar
Goethe-Institut
(2004) Einstufungstest [Placement test]. Retrieved from: <http://www.goethe.de/cgi-bin/einstufungstest/einstufungstest.pl> (30 October 2006)Google Scholar
Grabe, E.
(1998) Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(1983) How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 21, 501–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, J. & Hirt, C.
(1996) Using prosody to predict the end of sentences in English and French: Normal and brain damaged subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 107– 134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U.
(2009) Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.[ p. 473 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoyte, K. J., Brownell, H., & Wingfield, A.
(2009) Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 129–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G.
(2008) Exploring the role of age in the acquisition of a second language phonology. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 41–62). Amesterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K., & Strange, W.
(2009) Perception of allophonic cues to English word boundaries by Japanese second language learners of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2348–2360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., Strange, W., Wu, Y., Collado, J., & Guan, Q.
(2005) Age differences in perceptual sensitivity to new speech sounds: The younger the better? Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 29, 306–319.Google Scholar
Jackson, C., O’Brien, M. G., & Gardner, C. E.
(2011) Prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in L2 German. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 308–320). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Broersma, M., & Cho, T.
(2012) The use of prosodic cues in processing an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 415–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R.
(1999) Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langus, A., Marchetto, E., Bion, R. A. H., & Nespor, M.
(2012) Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech? Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 285–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I.
(1973) Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107–122.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. A.
(1976) The role of duration in disambiguation in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199–1202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lingel, S., Pappert, S., & Pechman, T.
(2006) The prosody of German pp-attachment ambiguities: Evidence from production and perception. Poster presentation at the 12th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A.
(2007) Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 898–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nguyễn, T. A., Ingram, C. L. J., & Pensalfini, J. R.
(2008) Prosodic transfer in Vietnamese acquisition of English contrastive stress patterns. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 158–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G.
(2003) Longitudinal development of second language German vowels. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H.
(2008) Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binominal data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A.
(2004) GLLAMM manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 160. http://​biostats​.bepress​.com​/ucbbiostat​/paper160 (retrieved 31 December 2011).Google Scholar
Schließer, J., Pappert, S., & Pechmann, T.
(2006) Case and prosody as predictors of argument structure. Paper presented at The 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Scott, D.
(1982) Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 996–1007.[ p. 474 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X. S.
(1990) Ability of learning the prosody of an intonational language by speakers of a tonal language: Chinese speakers learning French prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 119–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shockey, L.
(2003) Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J.
(2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, L.
(1978) Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1582–1592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D. A., Koh, C. K., Kjelgaard, M. M., Bruce, S., Speer, S. R., & Wingfield, A.
(2006) Agerelated impairments in the revision of syntactic misanalyses: Effects of prosody. Language and Speech, 49, 75–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Owens, N.
(2010) The role of acoustic cues in development of (non-)target-likesecond-language prosodic representations. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55, 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, M.
(2012) Comparing the perceptual abilities of monolinguals, bilinguals and multilinguals: A combined behavioural and event-related potential experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
(2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, S. G., & Lovick, O.
(2007) Intonational marking of discourse units in two Dena’ina narratives. Nouveaux cahier s de linguistique française, 28, 305–316;Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A.
(2009) Cross-language differences in cues for speech segmentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 367–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, V. J., & Haan, J.
(2000) When and how do we hear whether a Dutch speech utterance is a statement or a declarative question? Linguistics in the Netherlands, 17, 93–104.Google Scholar
Vion, M., & Colas, A.
(2006) Pitch cues for the recognition of yes-no questions in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 427–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G.
(2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 905–945.[ p. 475 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar